Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 9 Feb 2010 21:59 In article <4b71f125$0$4974$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:50:54 -0500, BAR wrote: > > In article <4b70dc7b$0$4983$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:46:50 +0000, assimilate wrote: > >>> On 8-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Jury is still out on Palin. > >>>> > >>>> In what respect, Bill? > >>> > >>> she is still active and could serve in public office again. > >> > >> You don't think her being a hopeless dingbat is a liability? > > > > History may just repeat itself. > > In what respect, Bert? I thought a freaking genius such as yourself could see the parallels over the past 40 years.
From: BAR on 9 Feb 2010 21:59 In article <4b71f275$0$4941$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:09:32 -0800, dene wrote: > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > news:a2p1n551rk6l1347r88pr3qlrmrk7cbpsn(a)4ax.com... > >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:46:50 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: > >>>On 8-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Jury is still out on Palin. > >>>> > >>>> In what respect, Bill? > >>> > >>>she is still active and could serve in public office again. > >> > >> If the GOP has any possibility of winning in '12 it sure won't be > >> with her on the ticket. > > > > Agree....for now, but look how many dismissed Ronald Reagan as a B > > movie star. Somehow...he turned out ok. She could evolve into a > > serious contender but as it stands now, she has zippo chance of > > becoming our next President in 2012. > > That is very hard to imagine. Palin is a dull normal, unfit for high > office even as a Republican. I just can't see her fooling enough voters > to win a national election. Whom did you vote for in November of 2008 for POTUS?
From: Carbon on 9 Feb 2010 22:25 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote: > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > wrote: >>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others >>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my >>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the >>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you >>>certifiable insane. >> >>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the >>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. > > That figures. You have no common sense. I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination. However, 2012 is a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able to fool the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad, because she would have zero chance of winning the election.
From: Carbon on 9 Feb 2010 22:31 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:59:47 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <4b71f275$0$4941$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:09:32 -0800, dene wrote: >>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>> news:a2p1n551rk6l1347r88pr3qlrmrk7cbpsn(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:46:50 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: >>>>> On 8-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Jury is still out on Palin. >>>>>> >>>>>> In what respect, Bill? >>>>> >>>>> she is still active and could serve in public office again. >>>> >>>> If the GOP has any possibility of winning in '12 it sure won't be >>>> with her on the ticket. >>> >>> Agree....for now, but look how many dismissed Ronald Reagan as a B >>> movie star. Somehow...he turned out ok. She could evolve into a >>> serious contender but as it stands now, she has zippo chance of >>> becoming our next President in 2012. >> >> That is very hard to imagine. Palin is a dull normal, unfit for high >> office even as a Republican. I just can't see her fooling enough >> voters to win a national election. > > Whom did you vote for in November of 2008 for POTUS? I win.
From: bknight on 9 Feb 2010 22:34
On 10 Feb 2010 03:25:58 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote: >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>> >>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others >>>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my >>>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the >>>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you >>>>certifiable insane. >>> >>>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the >>>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. >> >> That figures. You have no common sense. > >I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination. However, 2012 is >a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able to fool >the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad, because >she would have zero chance of winning the election. I'm liking Scott Brown more and more. He's a thousand times more qualified than Palin. If Obama isn't able to get things going better I think he's the GOP's best shot. I'd vote for him. BK |