Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 10 Feb 2010 07:40 In article <qd95n59hebc6rhg43ftls374akpfgra155(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:03:02 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <km44n5177qlfdklhs4tgpg0ocujrqgmrc5(a)4ax.com>, > >bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >> > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:31:32 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:54:29 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> > > >> > >> >>You know this for sure, right? Just more ultra-right babbling. > >> >> > >> >>BK > >> > > >> >The Senate passed a health care bill which taxed all high end health > >> >care programs to help pay for the expansion of Medicaid and the > >> >subsidies for lower income people to buy insurance. > >> > > >> >In the secret meetings to reconcile the bill with the House version, > >> >the unions were given an exemption from the tax. Do you think that > >> >Obama came up with that idea himself? > >> > >> > >> You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or > >> Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here > >> are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time. > >> Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about > >> Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane. > > > >Jack, Bobby is just upset that his apple cart has been turned over by > >the light of truth and sunshine. The current occupant of the White House > >is in the pocket of the Unions and everyone can see it. The Democrats > >silently cheer and and the Republicans publicly denounce it and the > >Independents are finding out that that all of Obama's talk about > >transparency is just that talk. > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/us/politics/31visitor.html > > > >Just keep challenging Bobby he will get so upset that he may explode. > > LOL > > Neither you nor Hollis is a challenge to anyone, on any level. > > BK You are too easy.
From: bknight on 10 Feb 2010 08:28 On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:40:25 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <qd95n59hebc6rhg43ftls374akpfgra155(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> Neither you nor Hollis is a challenge to anyone, on any level. >> >> BK > >You are too easy. > No, you just don't comprehend it when you've been laughed at. LOL. Is that clearer to you..... :-) BK
From: Moderate on 10 Feb 2010 08:28 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-5484D7.06572310022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <4b72976f$0$12444$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > "Moderate" <sparky@_engineer_.com> wrote: > >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> I didn't see your reply and I wasn't talking to you, anyway. >> ******************************************** >> >> ... but you did move the goal posts. Gottcha. > > Did you have that punch line written on the palm of your hand? Please try and keep up William. We were not discussing your rosy palm.
From: Moderate on 10 Feb 2010 08:34 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-595FAF.16061509022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hks11j$j6i$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-6A0626.09040209022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <alangbaker-09E570.11121808022010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >> > >> > Number one, you give people a contract with a loophole in. If you are >> > poor, you don't read/understand the fine print, and you can't afford a >> > lawyer. Or. in the case of a legal agreement, you simply harass the >> > renter, and convince them that they do not have legal rights that they >> > actually do. That is a very common tactic, since in many cases the >> > renters do not have access to the kind of legal advice they need. >> > >> > A few typical examples from New Jersey: >> > >> > http://tiny.cc/8LLDQ >> >> A typical Clark cite. Unread and unsupportive of his argument. Very >> scientific. > > Not unsupportive at all. Classic examples of how those with money and > influence can abuse those without. Actually they weren't, but you didn't read them so you missed that.
From: Moderate on 10 Feb 2010 08:34
"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:db2a27f5-440d-4f27-bbd9-e395f15e5b36(a)b10g2000vbh.googlegroups.com... On Feb 9, 5:44 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:0f1e0fe2-94a1-4c7a-ad10-3547471c68d6(a)a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > All govt. agencies that have money left over at the end of the > fiscal year have to give it back to the Treasury. > ==================== > > Yeah, that will happen, lol! It does happen. ************************************* Cite please. |