Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 10 Feb 2010 09:52 In article <MPG.25dc8275430b3b82989b67(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <hkuckh$4iv$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com > says... > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:wclark2-595FAF.16061509022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <hks11j$j6i$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > >> news:wclark2-6A0626.09040209022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > >> > In article <alangbaker-09E570.11121808022010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > >> > > > >> > Number one, you give people a contract with a loophole in. If you are > > >> > poor, you don't read/understand the fine print, and you can't afford a > > >> > lawyer. Or. in the case of a legal agreement, you simply harass the > > >> > renter, and convince them that they do not have legal rights that they > > >> > actually do. That is a very common tactic, since in many cases the > > >> > renters do not have access to the kind of legal advice they need. > > >> > > > >> > A few typical examples from New Jersey: > > >> > > > >> > http://tiny.cc/8LLDQ > > >> > > >> A typical Clark cite. Unread and unsupportive of his argument. Very > > >> scientific. > > > > > > Not unsupportive at all. Classic examples of how those with money and > > > influence can abuse those without. > > > > Actually they weren't, but you didn't read them so you missed that. > > Maybe he was Googling at the turn from his iPhone and couldn't surf and > drive the golf cart at the same time. Perhaps you were too busy reading Dino's "proof" of his publications in the materials science journals to notice.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 10 Feb 2010 09:53 On Feb 10, 9:51 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- state.edu> wrote: > In article <hkucap$45...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >news:wclark2-5484D7.06572310022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <4b72976f$0$12444$bbae4...(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > "Moderate" <sparky@_engineer_.com> wrote: > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> I didn't see your reply and I wasn't talking to you, anyway. > > >> ******************************************** > > > >> ... but you did move the goal posts. Gottcha. > > > > Did you have that punch line written on the palm of your hand? > > > Please try and keep up William. We were not discussing your rosy palm. > > No, it's just that "gotcha" is about as long a word as either you or the > Palinquitter could manage. And both of you need a prompter to answer a > simple, staged, question. No doubt, you were a corpse-man in the military!
From: BAR on 10 Feb 2010 10:16 In article <clark-00B9B0.09490810022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > In article <MPG.25dc6d3f66d5441b989b63(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <wclark2-544D01.07001110022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > In article <67a4n5d10mqh038e6i2fco1jf511hkoguo(a)4ax.com>, > > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > On 10 Feb 2010 03:25:58 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote: > > > > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or > > > > >>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others > > > > >>>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my > > > > >>>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the > > > > >>>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you > > > > >>>>certifiable insane. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the > > > > >>>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. > > > > >> > > > > >> That figures. You have no common sense. > > > > > > > > > >I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination. However, 2012 is > > > > >a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able to fool > > > > >the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad, because > > > > >she would have zero chance of winning the election. > > > > > > > > I'm liking Scott Brown more and more. He's a thousand times more > > > > qualified than Palin. If Obama isn't able to get things going better > > > > I think he's the GOP's best shot. I'd vote for him. > > > > > > > > BK > > > > > > As long as he and his wife promise to keep their clothes on in public. > > > Oh, and stop their daughter from getting in front of a microphone. > > > > The true character of Billy Clark shows through again. > > The true absence of any glimmer of humor in Bertie shows through again. > > Actually Brown and his family were in the Dubliner in DC last Thursday > evening after his swearing in. He kept his clothes on there, too. I like the Dubliner, my boss at USDA was an Irishman by birth, retired from the US Army after 20 and then went to work at USDA. He taught us how to drink proper beer at the Dubliner.
From: Moderate on 10 Feb 2010 10:27 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.25dc8275430b3b82989b67(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <hkuckh$4iv$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com > says... >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-595FAF.16061509022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <hks11j$j6i$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> >> news:wclark2-6A0626.09040209022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> > In article <alangbaker-09E570.11121808022010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >> >> > >> >> > Number one, you give people a contract with a loophole in. If you >> >> > are >> >> > poor, you don't read/understand the fine print, and you can't afford >> >> > a >> >> > lawyer. Or. in the case of a legal agreement, you simply harass the >> >> > renter, and convince them that they do not have legal rights that >> >> > they >> >> > actually do. That is a very common tactic, since in many cases the >> >> > renters do not have access to the kind of legal advice they need. >> >> > >> >> > A few typical examples from New Jersey: >> >> > >> >> > http://tiny.cc/8LLDQ >> >> >> >> A typical Clark cite. Unread and unsupportive of his argument. Very >> >> scientific. >> > >> > Not unsupportive at all. Classic examples of how those with money and >> > influence can abuse those without. >> >> Actually they weren't, but you didn't read them so you missed that. > > Maybe he was Googling at the turn from his iPhone and couldn't surf and > drive the golf cart at the same time. He was doing what he always does. Losing the debate.
From: William Clark on 10 Feb 2010 10:45
In article <MPG.25dc97c31d530f1c989b69(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-00B9B0.09490810022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > In article <MPG.25dc6d3f66d5441b989b63(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-544D01.07001110022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > In article <67a4n5d10mqh038e6i2fco1jf511hkoguo(a)4ax.com>, > > > > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 10 Feb 2010 03:25:58 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or > > > > > >>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others > > > > > >>>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't > > > > > >>>>waste my > > > > > >>>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance > > > > > >>>>the > > > > > >>>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you > > > > > >>>>certifiable insane. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the > > > > > >>>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> That figures. You have no common sense. > > > > > > > > > > > >I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination. However, > > > > > >2012 is > > > > > >a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able to > > > > > >fool > > > > > >the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad, > > > > > >because > > > > > >she would have zero chance of winning the election. > > > > > > > > > > I'm liking Scott Brown more and more. He's a thousand times more > > > > > qualified than Palin. If Obama isn't able to get things going better > > > > > I think he's the GOP's best shot. I'd vote for him. > > > > > > > > > > BK > > > > > > > > As long as he and his wife promise to keep their clothes on in public. > > > > Oh, and stop their daughter from getting in front of a microphone. > > > > > > The true character of Billy Clark shows through again. > > > > The true absence of any glimmer of humor in Bertie shows through again. > > > > Actually Brown and his family were in the Dubliner in DC last Thursday > > evening after his swearing in. He kept his clothes on there, too. > > I like the Dubliner, my boss at USDA was an Irishman by birth, retired > from the US Army after 20 and then went to work at USDA. He taught us > how to drink proper beer at the Dubliner. Indeed, Guinness is good there, Unfortunately, it seems to attract too many obnoxious staffers, fresh out of law school, from the Hill. Oh, well. |