From: MNMikeW on

"John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:79aca92b-bb37-48f7-a871-2fb0efbd8e26(a)d37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 10, 10:45 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
state.edu> wrote:
> In article <MPG.25dc97c31d530f1c989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
>
>
>
> BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > In article <clark-00B9B0.09490810022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>
> > > In article <MPG.25dc6d3f66d5441b989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> > > > In article <wclark2-544D01.07001110022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > > state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>
> > > > > In article <67a4n5d10mqh038e6i2fco1jf511hko...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 10 Feb 2010 03:25:58 GMT, Carbon
> > > > > > <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote:
> > > > > > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis
> > > > > > >> <xslee...(a)aol.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bkni...(a)conramp.net
> > > > > > >>>wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike,
> > > > > > >>>>or
> > > > > > >>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of
> > > > > > >>>>others
> > > > > > >>>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't
> > > > > > >>>>waste my
> > > > > > >>>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for
> > > > > > >>>>instance
> > > > > > >>>>the
> > > > > > >>>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you
> > > > > > >>>>certifiable insane.
>
> > > > > > >>>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender
> > > > > > >>>for the
> > > > > > >>>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
>
> > > > > > >> That figures. You have no common sense.
>
> > > > > > >I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination.
> > > > > > >However,
> > > > > > >2012 is
> > > > > > >a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able
> > > > > > >to
> > > > > > >fool
> > > > > > >the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad,
> > > > > > >because
> > > > > > >she would have zero chance of winning the election.
>
> > > > > > I'm liking Scott Brown more and more. He's a thousand times more
> > > > > > qualified than Palin. If Obama isn't able to get things going
> > > > > > better
> > > > > > I think he's the GOP's best shot. I'd vote for him.
>
> > > > > > BK
>
> > > > > As long as he and his wife promise to keep their clothes on in
> > > > > public.
> > > > > Oh, and stop their daughter from getting in front of a microphone.
>
> > > > The true character of Billy Clark shows through again.
>
> > > The true absence of any glimmer of humor in Bertie shows through
> > > again.
>
> > > Actually Brown and his family were in the Dubliner in DC last Thursday
> > > evening after his swearing in. He kept his clothes on there, too.
>
> > I like the Dubliner, my boss at USDA was an Irishman by birth, retired
> > from the US Army after 20 and then went to work at USDA. He taught us
> > how to drink proper beer at the Dubliner.
>
> Indeed, Guinness is good there, Unfortunately, it seems to attract too
> many obnoxious staffers, fresh out of law school, from the Hill. Oh,
> well.

All true. I don't know if it's still the case, but the Dubliner used
to be the largest seller of Guiness in the U.S.

I will be doing my part to make sure Patrick McGoverns Pub in Saint Paul
sets that record on St. Pattys day. ;-)


From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-D56CDA.11305210022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <7tg31iFilgU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com...
>> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>> >
>> >>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or
>> >>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here
>> >>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time.
>> >>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about
>> >>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane.
>> >>
>> >>BK
>> >
>> > Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the
>> > Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
>>
>> They would be complete fools to run her again.
>
> Well, we agree on something :-)

That and Guinness. Perhaps there is hope. :-)


From: dene on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:n7q5n59p1tcru9nip7vnqsq05ctlv8h8bp(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:01:34 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >news:jee5n5t762eoi8llghtp2n43cv9al32gra(a)4ax.com...
> >
> >>
> >> What bullshit Bert. There's been no whining, nor complaining. When I
> >> have a view I post it, and if it doesn't fit your shallow minded
> >> ideological thoughts you can't come up with anything better than this?
> >>
> >>
> >> >Why is liberalism morally superior to conservatism?
> >>
> >> You throw out such stupid aphorisms as if they're reasonable, trying
> >> to make an issue where there isn't one. Show us where anyone here
> >> that has brought up moral superiority of either.
> >>
> >> Questions like this underscore your limited range of cognition.
> >>
> >> BK
> >
> >Hmmm.....did I just read a post full of whining and complaining?
> >
> >
> >-Greg
> >
> Right on cue Greg. You're obsessed with me.
>
> There's no whining, and pointing out Bert's shortcomings isn't
> complaining.
> Hell, I don't complain about your insipid sniping.... I just point it
> out.
>
> Don't you have something constructive to do?
> Now there's a non sequitur thought. LOL.
>
> BK

You're too easy.

-Greg


From: bknight on
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:54:08 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
wrote:

>
><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:n7q5n59p1tcru9nip7vnqsq05ctlv8h8bp(a)4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:01:34 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>> >news:jee5n5t762eoi8llghtp2n43cv9al32gra(a)4ax.com...
>> >
>> >>
>> >> What bullshit Bert. There's been no whining, nor complaining. When I
>> >> have a view I post it, and if it doesn't fit your shallow minded
>> >> ideological thoughts you can't come up with anything better than this?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Why is liberalism morally superior to conservatism?
>> >>
>> >> You throw out such stupid aphorisms as if they're reasonable, trying
>> >> to make an issue where there isn't one. Show us where anyone here
>> >> that has brought up moral superiority of either.
>> >>
>> >> Questions like this underscore your limited range of cognition.
>> >>
>> >> BK
>> >
>> >Hmmm.....did I just read a post full of whining and complaining?
>> >
>> >
>> >-Greg
>> >
>> Right on cue Greg. You're obsessed with me.
>>
>> There's no whining, and pointing out Bert's shortcomings isn't
>> complaining.
>> Hell, I don't complain about your insipid sniping.... I just point it
>> out.
>>
>> Don't you have something constructive to do?
>> Now there's a non sequitur thought. LOL.
>>
>> BK
>
>You're too easy.
>
>-Greg
>
LOL

You're obsessed with me, and just can't help it.

BK
From: John B. on
On Feb 10, 12:26 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:79aca92b-bb37-48f7-a871-2fb0efbd8e26(a)d37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 10, 10:45 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
>
>
>
> state.edu> wrote:
> > In article <MPG.25dc97c31d530f1c989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
>
> > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > In article <clark-00B9B0.09490810022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>
> > > > In article <MPG.25dc6d3f66d5441b989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > In article <wclark2-544D01.07001110022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>
> > > > > > In article <67a4n5d10mqh038e6i2fco1jf511hko...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On 10 Feb 2010 03:25:58 GMT, Carbon
> > > > > > > <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight wrote:
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:17 -0500, Jack Hollis
> > > > > > > >> <xslee...(a)aol.com>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bkni...(a)conramp.net
> > > > > > > >>>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike,
> > > > > > > >>>>or
> > > > > > > >>>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of
> > > > > > > >>>>others
> > > > > > > >>>>here are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't
> > > > > > > >>>>waste my
> > > > > > > >>>>time. Of all the posts that you've delivered here for
> > > > > > > >>>>instance
> > > > > > > >>>>the
> > > > > > > >>>>one about Palin possibly being elected president renders you
> > > > > > > >>>>certifiable insane.
>
> > > > > > > >>>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender
> > > > > > > >>>for the
> > > > > > > >>>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama.
>
> > > > > > > >> That figures. You have no common sense.
>
> > > > > > > >I actually want Palin to get the Republican nomination.
> > > > > > > >However,
> > > > > > > >2012 is
> > > > > > > >a long way away and there isn't much chance that she'd be able
> > > > > > > >to
> > > > > > > >fool
> > > > > > > >the true believers long enough to make it happen. It's too bad,
> > > > > > > >because
> > > > > > > >she would have zero chance of winning the election.
>
> > > > > > > I'm liking Scott Brown more and more. He's a thousand times more
> > > > > > > qualified than Palin. If Obama isn't able to get things going
> > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > I think he's the GOP's best shot. I'd vote for him.
>
> > > > > > > BK
>
> > > > > > As long as he and his wife promise to keep their clothes on in
> > > > > > public.
> > > > > > Oh, and stop their daughter from getting in front of a microphone.
>
> > > > > The true character of Billy Clark shows through again.
>
> > > > The true absence of any glimmer of humor in Bertie shows through
> > > > again.
>
> > > > Actually Brown and his family were in the Dubliner in DC last Thursday
> > > > evening after his swearing in. He kept his clothes on there, too.
>
> > > I like the Dubliner, my boss at USDA was an Irishman by birth, retired
> > > from the US Army after 20 and then went to work at USDA. He taught us
> > > how to drink proper beer at the Dubliner.
>
> > Indeed, Guinness is good there, Unfortunately, it seems to attract too
> > many obnoxious staffers, fresh out of law school, from the Hill. Oh,
> > well.
>
> All true. I don't know if it's still the case, but the Dubliner used
> to be the largest seller of Guiness in the U.S.
>
> I will be doing my part to make sure Patrick McGoverns Pub in Saint Paul
> sets that record on St. Pattys day. ;-)

You can do it, Mike! I'll be pulling for you. :-)