Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Jack Hollis on 10 Feb 2010 13:43 On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:05:08 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >So why did that state's insurance department allow such an increase? Is it >conceivable that they are losing money, hand over fist? In California, the state does not have to approve rate increases. The increase only effects 800,000 individual policyholders. Looks like ABCB is either losing money on individual policies, or just wants to get out of the business entirely.
From: Jack Hollis on 10 Feb 2010 13:49 On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:03:02 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >> Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here >> are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time. >> Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about >> Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane. > >Jack, Bobby is just upset that his apple cart has been turned over by >the light of truth and sunshine. The current occupant of the White House >is in the pocket of the Unions and everyone can see it. The Democrats >silently cheer and and the Republicans publicly denounce it and the >Independents are finding out that that all of Obama's talk about >transparency is just that talk. Anyone who thinks that Sarah Palin can't be elected president is living in a fantasy land. And I can assure you that I am not certifiably insane.
From: Jack Hollis on 10 Feb 2010 13:58 On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:52:17 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:9264n5l6besm20bkqla1b1fgmeqcglhgm9(a)4ax.com... >> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:02:37 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >>>You know Jack, I might be willing to discuss this with Mike, or >>>Ketchum, or another conservative, but you, and a couple of others here >>>are so inane with the ultra-right messages that I won't waste my time. >>>Of all the posts that you've delivered here for instance the one about >>>Palin possibly being elected president renders you certifiable insane. >>> >>>BK >> >> Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the >> Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. > >They would be complete fools to run her again. It's not up to the Republican Party. It's up to the Republican primary voters. She has two years to put her run together. I wouldn't bet against her.
From: dene on 10 Feb 2010 14:04 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:rqs5n55p52o3bpvh8csp9i3dosto7fcja4(a)4ax.com... + > > > >You're too easy. > > > >-Greg > > > LOL > > You're obsessed with me, and just can't help it. > > BK Yeah....must be those reoccuring old man dreams. You and the two Ned Devine dudes. You wouldn't happen to own a motorcycle?? -Greg
From: Jack Hollis on 10 Feb 2010 14:04
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:46:19 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >>Right now, the polls show that she's the leading contender for the >>Republican nomination. I'd gladly vote for her over Obama. > >That figures. You have no common sense. > >BK That's fine with me, but I think that anyone who voted for Obama has no common sense. |