Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: John B. on 11 Feb 2010 11:45 On Feb 11, 12:50 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > On 9-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > So you're certain beyond any doubt that government intervention in the > > economy has had nothing to do with the growth in GDP in Q3 and Q4 of > > 2009 or with the drop in unemployment in January 2010? > > Why do you ask such juvenile questions? This is not a court of law, so I > don't need to be certain beyond any doubt. :-P However it is safe to say > that w/o the Stimulus and the car bailouts we would be better off today. The > net effect of these steps (along with cash for clunkers and the housing tax > credit) is uncertanity. Couple this with all the veiled and not so veiled > threats from the political class towards businessmen and you get a climate > where no one wants to hire or invest in new capital projects. > > -- > bill-o I don't read democratic propaganda, I read history. And I don't get it from blogs, as you seem to.
From: John B. on 11 Feb 2010 11:48 On Feb 11, 8:28 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-3A89FE.08031211022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.25ddc5d39f71e67e989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > In article <wclark2-4452E0.21062110022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > In article <4b735a66$0$12438$bbae4...(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > > "Moderate" <sparky@_engineer_.com> wrote: > > > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > > >news:clark-2E8C9B.09512510022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu.... > > > > > > In article <hkucap$45...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > >>news:wclark2-5484D7.06572310022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > >> > In article <4b72976f$0$12444$bbae4...(a)news.suddenlink.net>, > > > > > >> > "Moderate" <sparky@_engineer_.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> I didn't see your reply and I wasn't talking to you, anyway.. > > > > > >> >> ******************************************** > > > > > > >> >> ... but you did move the goal posts. Gottcha. > > > > > > >> > Did you have that punch line written on the palm of your hand? > > > > > > >> Please try and keep up William. We were not discussing your rosy palm. > > > > > > > No, it's just that "gotcha" is about as long a word as either you or the > > > > > > Palinquitter could manage. And both of you need a prompter to answer a > > > > > > simple, staged, question. > > > > > > Whereas you and Obama would sooner tell a lie than the truth. > > > > > Better write that on the palm of your hand - so that next time you might > > > > remember that "gotcha" only has one "t". > > > > At least it doesn't require the use of a TelePrompter to feed real-time > > > information to the POTUS. > > > Ah, so incoherent scribblings on the palm of your hand necessary to > > answer softball, pre-determined, questions, trumps using a teleprompter > > to give coherent and factually correct speeches, or holding an inpromptu > > Q&A session with the GoP for an hour, does it? > > > Strange world you live in. > > Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room full of 6th graders? > > Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room with about 20 people? > > A couple of words written on your hand vs. the inability to speak > extemporaneously.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I suppose he used it because he had a prepared speech which he hadn't memorized. What's wrong with that?
From: BAR on 11 Feb 2010 12:01 In article <42a424ca-1e20-4a2a-a820-59dbf5910fd5 @a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Feb 11, 12:50�am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > > On �9-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So you're certain beyond any doubt that government intervention in the > > > economy has had nothing to do with the growth in GDP in Q3 and Q4 of > > > 2009 or with the drop in unemployment in January 2010? > > > > Why do you ask such juvenile questions? This is not a court of law, so I > > don't need to be certain beyond any doubt. :-P However it is safe to say > > that w/o the Stimulus and the car bailouts we would be better off today. The > > net effect of these steps (along with cash for clunkers and the housing tax > > credit) is uncertanity. Couple this with all the veiled and not so veiled > > threats from the political class towards businessmen and you get a climate > > where no one wants to hire or invest in new capital projects. > > > > -- > > bill-o > > I don't read democratic propaganda, I read history. And I don't get it > from blogs, as you seem to. Who wrote the history?
From: bknight on 11 Feb 2010 12:33 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:21:44 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >> >The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long >> >way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter. >> > >> > >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >> congressmen, all off the cuff? > >In your dreams only. > Enough so that the Senators don't want to be embarrassed too. They won't subject themselves to such a drubbing. BK
From: bknight on 11 Feb 2010 12:37
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:35:04 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >>>The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long >>>way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter. >>> >>> >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >> congressmen, all off the cuff? >> >> BK > >Whipping is subjective. > The subject was the Republican house reps, and denying it is laughable. Look, Obama hasn't been able to live up to his promises, made several mistakes and has a tough row to hoe now. It would be wise for the ultra-right to discuss those situations rather than the silliness of birth certificates, TelePrompTer and the extreme stupidity of questioning his intellect....especially in comparison to George Bush, who is the biggest simpleton to have been elected to President. BK |