From: BAR on
In article <tqf8n5hn18vme23fd6hi2ofq0js9sntn6i(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:35:04 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long
> >>>way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub
> >> congressmen, all off the cuff?
> >>
> >> BK
> >
> >Whipping is subjective.
> >
> The subject was the Republican house reps, and denying it is
> laughable.
>
> Look, Obama hasn't been able to live up to his promises, made several
> mistakes and has a tough row to hoe now. It would be wise for the
> ultra-right to discuss those situations rather than the silliness of
> birth certificates, TelePrompTer and the extreme stupidity of
> questioning his intellect....especially in comparison to George Bush,
> who is the biggest simpleton to have been elected to President.

Obama hasn't lived up to any of his promises.

Obama has made and continues to make mistakes on a daily basis.

For a guy your age Bobby you sure don't have any idea about how to keep
other people off of their game. There is no reason to engage the
Democrats on the issues when you can keep attacking them for silly
little things. Ask Chuck Shumer if it was a good strategy.

The Democrats biggest problem is that they are made up of many factions
and if the Republicans can continue to keep the Democrats fighting
amongst themselves the Democrats will not get anything done.

You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected
governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US. If that is a
simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce.

From: BAR on
In article <q4g8n511hap3oijgt187n8vjt7lmk754p0(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John B."
> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 11, 8:28�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> >> In article <clark-3A89FE.08031211022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> >> state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> >>
> >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room full of 6th graders?
> >>
> >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room with about 20 people?
>
> >
> >I suppose he used it because he had a prepared speech which he hadn't
> >memorized. What's wrong with that?
>
> Plus the fact that the 6 children and the room of 20 people were not
> the audience...TV coverage live is quite larger.
>
> Silly argument, but that's all Bert

Spin it anyway you want. But, the picture of Obama's podium and
TelePrompter taking up 60% of a 6th grade classroom doesn't engender a
lot of confidence in Obama's ability to speak to children much less
adults without electronic assistance.
From: bknight on
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:58:12 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <sof8n5drfaqjkerbbv1ubt2f5ts6ta5i8l(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:21:44 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>,
>> >bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a long
>> >> >way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the TelePrompter.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub
>> >> congressmen, all off the cuff?
>> >
>> >In your dreams only.
>> >
>> Enough so that the Senators don't want to be embarrassed too. They
>> won't subject themselves to such a drubbing.
>
>In your dreams only.
>
>
Bert! This has been widely publicized. He offered to meet with them
and they said no, not as a large group, just with a few of the
leaders. They obviously don't want a repeat of the representatives'
poor showing.

BK
From: bknight on
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:14:42 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <tqf8n5hn18vme23fd6hi2ofq0js9sntn6i(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:35:04 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message

>For a guy your age Bobby you sure don't have any idea about how to keep
>other people off of their game

For a guy your age you really seem to love to revert to teenage
gamesmanship. Its just silly Bert, and I grew out of it years ago.
Time for you to do the same.

> There is no reason to engage the Democrats on the issues when you can keep attacking them for silly
>little things. Ask Chuck Shumer if it was a good strategy.
>
>The Democrats biggest problem is that they are made up of many factions
>and if the Republicans can continue to keep the Democrats fighting
>amongst themselves the Democrats will not get anything done.

You'd rather see the country suffer than have a specific party get
something done? That speaks tons about your small mind.

>You keep talking about Bush as a simpleton. But, he was a twice elected
>governor of Texas and twice elected President of the US.

Do you think getting elected to anything makes you smart? Barney
Frank isn't any smarter by getting elected.

> If that is a simpleton in your books then Obama is a stunning dunce.

Poor Bert. You just don't get it, and never will. One thing has
nothing to do with the other. I haven't met Obama but I have met
Bush, when he was governor here. He's an empty suit.

BK
From: bknight on
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:17:53 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

>In article <q4g8n511hap3oijgt187n8vjt7lmk754p0(a)4ax.com>,
>bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:48:21 -0800 (PST), "John B."
>> <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 11, 8:28�am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <clark-3A89FE.08031211022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>> >> state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room full of 6th graders?
>> >>
>> >> Why did Obama use a TelePrompter in a room with about 20 people?
>>
>> >
>> >I suppose he used it because he had a prepared speech which he hadn't
>> >memorized. What's wrong with that?
>>
>> Plus the fact that the 6 children and the room of 20 people were not
>> the audience...TV coverage live is quite larger.
>>
>> Silly argument, but that's all Bert
>
>Spin it anyway you want. But, the picture of Obama's podium and
>TelePrompter taking up 60% of a 6th grade classroom doesn't engender a
>lot of confidence in Obama's ability to speak to children much less
>adults without electronic assistance.

Only to small minded, dyed in the wool sheep that can't see anything
outside their little world.

BK