Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 11 Feb 2010 18:38 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:45:54 -0600, bknight wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:21 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:7tiptpFq3qU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>> news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has a >>>>> long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the >>>>> TelePrompter. >>>>> >>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>> >>> Whipping is subjective. >> >>Agree. Saw the whole thing. Both sides rose to the occasion and it >>was a healthy exchange. "Whipping" is a gross overstatement. > > That's probably true, but I hold that it absolutely blows the BS about > Obama not being able to speak, and debate without a TelePrompTer. The true believers are ignoring it as hard as they can.
From: Carbon on 11 Feb 2010 18:44 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:01:25 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <42a424ca-1e20-4a2a-a820-59dbf5910fd5 > @a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >> On Feb 11, 12:50 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: >>> On 9-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> So you're certain beyond any doubt that government intervention in >>>> the economy has had nothing to do with the growth in GDP in Q3 and >>>> Q4 of 2009 or with the drop in unemployment in January 2010? >>> >>> Why do you ask such juvenile questions? This is not a court of law, >>> so I don't need to be certain beyond any doubt. :-P However it is >>> safe to say that w/o the Stimulus and the car bailouts we would be >>> better off today. The net effect of these steps (along with cash for >>> clunkers and the housing tax credit) is uncertanity. Couple this >>> with all the veiled and not so veiled threats from the political >>> class towards businessmen and you get a climate where no one wants >>> to hire or invest in new capital projects. >> >> I don't read democratic propaganda, I read history. And I don't get >> it from blogs, as you seem to. > > Who wrote the history? Atilla the Hun.
From: Carbon on 11 Feb 2010 18:48 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b748e2c$0$5095$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:51:42 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>> news:eni8n5d2ni49tgp0j8pd0dc4p0jroki97j(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:58:12 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>> In article <sof8n5drfaqjkerbbv1ubt2f5ts6ta5i8l(a)4ax.com>, >>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:21:44 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>> In article <nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>> bknight(a)conramp.net says... >>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama >>>>>>>>> has a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of >>>>>>>>> the TelePrompter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In your dreams only. >>>>>> >>>>>> Enough so that the Senators don't want to be embarrassed too. >>>>>> They won't subject themselves to such a drubbing. >>>>> >>>>> In your dreams only. >>>> >>>> Bert! This has been widely publicized. He offered to meet with >>>> them and they said no, not as a large group, just with a few of the >>>> leaders. They obviously don't want a repeat of the >>>> representatives' poor showing. >>> >>> And the only people saying it was a "drubbing" are left wing blogs. >>> The meeting they want to have on the 25th is just as bogus. Obama >>> has stated he has no plans on starting over on healthcare. So >>> whatever proposals are presented by the Repubs, they will be >>> rejected. The people want a "do-over" on this and so do most Repubs. >>> Obama will not allow that so basically it comes down to nothing more >>> than more Obama Kabuki theater. >> >> Jesus. You guys say you've watched it. Are you all blind, or what? > > We dont have blinders on like you. No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and stupid.
From: Carbon on 11 Feb 2010 18:50 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr >> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and he's a lightweight. >> She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben. She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing herself. It's not like she did well.
From: David Laville on 11 Feb 2010 19:44
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:56:14 -0800 (PST), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >I don't know what this is, but it is flat-out wrong to identify Kevin >Phillips as a liberal. He is a conservative who hated the Bush family. >Apparently, in some circles that makes him a liberal. I got it from the link Carbon posted. It has to be credible, a fellow leftist of yours is using it as a reference (sarcasm intended). David Laville G.S.E.M. The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor |