From: assimilate on 12 Feb 2010 01:40
On 11-Feb-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
> > > Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than
> > > anticipated,
> > > and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was worth, it was
> > > pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony right rednecks.
> > that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the
> > movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair.
> Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it.
Get your jolies while you can, 2010 will be ugly for you lefties.
From: assimilate on 12 Feb 2010 01:45
On 11-Feb-2010, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:
> It's unlikely that the Republicans will gain majority in the Senate.
> Gaining control of the House is more likely, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Any handicaping today for Nov is meaningless, let's talk towards the end of
From: Moderate on 12 Feb 2010 08:15
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as dumb
>> as paint.
> Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or the
> American electorate who elected this dummy.
I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's
intelligence. What a boob.
From: Moderate on 12 Feb 2010 08:18
"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote:
>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr
>>> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:
>>> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and he's a lightweight.
>>> She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds.
>> In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben.
> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to
> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing
> herself. It's not like she did well.
Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. Obama is nothing more than
a talking head. He is the Commander in Chief, yet he doesn't know what a
From: MNMikeW on 12 Feb 2010 08:30
<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:30:59 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:57:47 -0600, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>>His hencemen Pelosi and Reid wrote it for him. It is still his baby.
>>> Wait. They're his henchmen? I thought that he was their puppet.
>>> The ultras just waft back and forth to try to make points....than
>>> dispute each other.
>>Your right. Emanuael is the henchman. Pelosi and Reid are the
> That's plan C. The "handlers" change with each day. Truth be told,
> Obama isn't handled.