Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: John B. on 12 Feb 2010 15:09 On Feb 12, 2:36 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > >> I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > >> -Greg > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > Ironically this was the tenet that started this thread. Oops. No, it wasn't. I started this thread by asking how conservatives/ Republicans felt about Tom Tancredo's remarks at the Tea Party convention. I think I got two answers.
From: BAR on 12 Feb 2010 15:15 In article <a228c2ec-4f95-4d5f-a3c2-9f329aa58671 @k11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Feb 12, 2:36�pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > >> I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > >> -Greg > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > > Ironically this was the tenet that started this thread. �Oops. > > No, it wasn't. I started this thread by asking how conservatives/ > Republicans felt about Tom Tancredo's remarks at the Tea Party > convention. I think I got two answers. You came here looking for a pissing match and you are upset that you got a pissing match.
From: Moderate on 12 Feb 2010 16:05 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:a228c2ec-4f95-4d5f-a3c2-9f329aa58671(a)k11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... On Feb 12, 2:36 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > >> I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > >> -Greg > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > Ironically this was the tenet that started this thread. Oops. No, it wasn't. I started this thread by asking how conservatives/ Republicans felt about Tom Tancredo's remarks at the Tea Party convention. I think I got two answers. **************************************** Yes, Tancredo's remarks about the intellect of the electorate.
From: William Clark on 12 Feb 2010 17:39 In article <hl4fqq$hta$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:a228c2ec-4f95-4d5f-a3c2-9f329aa58671(a)k11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 12, 2:36 pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > >> I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > >> -Greg > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > > Ironically this was the tenet that started this thread. Oops. > > No, it wasn't. I started this thread by asking how conservatives/ > Republicans felt about Tom Tancredo's remarks at the Tea Party > convention. I think I got two answers. > > **************************************** > > Yes, Tancredo's remarks about the intellect of the electorate. No, Tancredo's remark was about ways of denying minorities the vote.
From: William Clark on 12 Feb 2010 17:39
In article <MPG.25df80d673ae763f989ba9(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <a228c2ec-4f95-4d5f-a3c2-9f329aa58671 > @k11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > > > On Feb 12, 2:36�pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > > > > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > > > >> -Greg > > > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > > > > Ironically this was the tenet that started this thread. �Oops. > > > > No, it wasn't. I started this thread by asking how conservatives/ > > Republicans felt about Tom Tancredo's remarks at the Tea Party > > convention. I think I got two answers. > > You came here looking for a pissing match and you are upset that you got > a pissing match. Wouldn't expect anything else from you and Moddy. |