Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 12 Feb 2010 19:02 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:15:17 -0600, Moderate wrote: > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> >>> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as >>> dumb as paint. >> >> Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or >> the American electorate who elected this dummy. > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's > intelligence. What a boob. So, where do you feel you fit on the great bellcurve? Ahead of Clark? Obama? How about Palin? Actually I might spot you that last one.
From: Carbon on 12 Feb 2010 19:04 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989ba8(a)news.giganews.com>, >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? >> >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton agrees with you.
From: Carbon on 12 Feb 2010 19:07 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:34:03 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b7494aa$0$31017$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:21 -0800, dene wrote: >>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:7tiptpFq3qU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>> news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has >>>>>> a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the >>>>>> TelePrompter. >>>>>> >>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub >>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff? >>>> >>>> Whipping is subjective. >>> >>> Agree. Saw the whole thing. Both sides rose to the occasion and it >>> was a healthy exchange. "Whipping" is a gross overstatement. >> >> The GOP lined up for an hour and asked him prepared question after >> prepared question. They gained no ground whatsoever. Call it whatever >> you want. The Republicans know what happened and will never invite >> him to another debate like this again. > > Pulhleese. Like they're scared of Obama. They are now.
From: Carbon on 12 Feb 2010 19:08 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:41:27 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > <assimilate(a)borg.org> wrote in message > news:uE6dn.71265$RS6.56746(a)newsfe15.iad... >> On 11-Feb-2010, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> Obama desperately needs the Palin distraction. As long as his allies >>> in the liberal press talk about Palin 24/7 it detracts from his >>> miserable polling numbers. Not to mention his socialist takeover of >>> the US. >> >> nothing else would explain the obession with someone out of public >> office for 6-9 months > > Yes funny they are not all over the Edwards circus. Oh, that's right, > he's a Democrat. He's a has-been.
From: dene on 12 Feb 2010 20:09
"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-2CCBF6.13593212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <7tlji6FfhhU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-93314C.09480012022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > > > > > > You're making a big deal out of nothing. > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > Ah, so if it is Obama and the teleprompter to make sure he gets things > > > right, it is a matter of national importance, but if it is SarahQuitter > > > being incapable of answering scripted questions without stuff scrawled > > > on the palm of her hand like a third grader, that is trivial. > > > > > > Your hypocritical double standards know no bounds, do they? > > > > 1. Name the post where I criticized Obama for having a teleprompter. > > > > 2. Realizing none, be a man of integrity and take back these words. > > > > -Greg > > Getting a bit whiny, aren't we? You jump into a thread where Obama and > the teleprompter are a huge deal, but Palin's palm notes can be waved > off. > > > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a > > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three > > words on one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I > > have....and it's not easy. > > You join the "Palin's palm notes are nothing" side, and then you get all > offended because you get called for doing it? Not to mention being dumb > enough to a k a college professor if they ever did any public speaking. > Duh. A. I didn't criticize O for his teleprompter. Just because some in this thread do doesn't mean I'm hypocritical for telling you/the reader that writing on a palm is no big deal. B. I didn't claim you have no speaking experience. However, many don't and it's not an easy task. When I post, it's not exclusively to you. I know you're the center of the universe but try to visualize usenet as a bulletin board. C. You had a chance to show some integrity. -Greg |