From: Carbon on
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:15:17 -0600, Moderate wrote:
> "dene" <dene(a)> wrote in message
> news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)
>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)> wrote in message
>> news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)
>>> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as
>>> dumb as paint.
>> Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or
>> the American electorate who elected this dummy.
> I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's
> intelligence. What a boob.

So, where do you feel you fit on the great bellcurve? Ahead of Clark?
Obama? How about Palin? Actually I might spot you that last one.
From: Carbon on
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote:
> In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
>>, clark(a) says...
>> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989ba8(a)>,
>> BAR <screw(a)> wrote:
>>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich?
>> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich.
> You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has.

You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton
agrees with you.
From: Carbon on
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:34:03 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)> wrote in message
> news:4b7494aa$0$31017$9a6e19ea(a)
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:21 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)> wrote in message
>>> news:7tiptpFq3qU1(a)
>>>> <bknight(a)> wrote in message
>>>> news:nta8n5p2g17si7haj18qn7kif0vi0k4kre(a)
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:04:37 -0500, BAR <screw(a)> wrote:
>>>>>> The TelePrompter "BS" hasn't been wiped off the table. Obama has
>>>>>> a long way to go before he can claim to be weaned off of the
>>>>>> TelePrompter.
>>>>> Cripes Bert. Didn't you see the whipping he gave the repub
>>>>> congressmen, all off the cuff?
>>>> Whipping is subjective.
>>> Agree. Saw the whole thing. Both sides rose to the occasion and it
>>> was a healthy exchange. "Whipping" is a gross overstatement.
>> The GOP lined up for an hour and asked him prepared question after
>> prepared question. They gained no ground whatsoever. Call it whatever
>> you want. The Republicans know what happened and will never invite
>> him to another debate like this again.
> Pulhleese. Like they're scared of Obama.

They are now.
From: Carbon on
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:41:27 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> <assimilate(a)> wrote in message
> news:uE6dn.71265$RS6.56746(a)newsfe15.iad...
>> On 11-Feb-2010, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)> wrote:
>>> Obama desperately needs the Palin distraction. As long as his allies
>>> in the liberal press talk about Palin 24/7 it detracts from his
>>> miserable polling numbers. Not to mention his socialist takeover of
>>> the US.
>> nothing else would explain the obession with someone out of public
>> office for 6-9 months
> Yes funny they are not all over the Edwards circus. Oh, that's right,
> he's a Democrat.

He's a has-been.
From: dene on

"William Clark" <clark(a)> wrote in message
> In article <7tlji6FfhhU1(a)>,
> "dene" <dene(a)> wrote:
> > "William Clark" <clark(a)> wrote in message
> > news:clark-93314C.09480012022010(a)
> >
> > > >
> > > > You're making a big deal out of nothing.
> > > >
> > > > -Greg
> > >
> > > Ah, so if it is Obama and the teleprompter to make sure he gets things
> > > right, it is a matter of national importance, but if it is
> > > being incapable of answering scripted questions without stuff scrawled
> > > on the palm of her hand like a third grader, that is trivial.
> > >
> > > Your hypocritical double standards know no bounds, do they?
> >
> > 1. Name the post where I criticized Obama for having a teleprompter.
> >
> > 2. Realizing none, be a man of integrity and take back these words.
> >
> > -Greg
> Getting a bit whiny, aren't we? You jump into a thread where Obama and
> the teleprompter are a huge deal, but Palin's palm notes can be waved
> off.
> > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a
> > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three
> > words on one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I
> > have....and it's not easy.
> You join the "Palin's palm notes are nothing" side, and then you get all
> offended because you get called for doing it? Not to mention being dumb
> enough to a k a college professor if they ever did any public speaking.
> Duh.

A. I didn't criticize O for his teleprompter. Just because some in this
thread do doesn't mean I'm hypocritical for telling you/the reader that
writing on a palm is no big deal.

B. I didn't claim you have no speaking experience. However, many don't and
it's not an easy task. When I post, it's not exclusively to you. I know
you're the center of the universe but try to visualize usenet as a bulletin

C. You had a chance to show some integrity.