Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: dene on 13 Feb 2010 04:54 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <7tljlbFg5aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <hl3k94$337$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > > > news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > >> > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as > > dumb > > > > >> as paint. > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or > > the > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's > > > > intelligence. What a boob. > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find some. > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > -Greg > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > indictment of the Americn electorate. Exactly why do you live here, Clark? -Greg
From: BAR on 13 Feb 2010 09:15 In article <7tnausFr8tU1(a)mid.individual.net>, dene(a)remove.ipns.com says... > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-880F44.14010212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <7tljlbFg5aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > In article <hl3k94$337$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's > as > > > dumb > > > > > >> as paint. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, > or > > > the > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's > > > > > intelligence. What a boob. > > > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find some. > > > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > Exactly why do you live here, Clark? He couldn't get a job in Merry Old England.
From: John B. on 13 Feb 2010 10:09 On Feb 12, 11:26 pm, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > On 12-Feb-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it. > > > > Get your jolies while you can, 2010 will be ugly for you lefties. > > > You know Bill, I think you're right. But Obama will still win a second > > term. > > Things will have to get a whole lot better in a hurry. Clinton had a good > economy going for him in 92. W/o a similar wind at his back Obama has little > chance. > > -- > bill-o If there had been a good economy in '92, Clinton wouldn't have been elected.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 10:34 In article <7tmc60Fjn0U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > news:clark-2CCBF6.13593212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <7tlji6FfhhU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > news:clark-93314C.09480012022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're making a big deal out of nothing. > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > Ah, so if it is Obama and the teleprompter to make sure he gets things > > > > right, it is a matter of national importance, but if it is > SarahQuitter > > > > being incapable of answering scripted questions without stuff scrawled > > > > on the palm of her hand like a third grader, that is trivial. > > > > > > > > Your hypocritical double standards know no bounds, do they? > > > > > > 1. Name the post where I criticized Obama for having a teleprompter. > > > > > > 2. Realizing none, be a man of integrity and take back these words. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > Getting a bit whiny, aren't we? You jump into a thread where Obama and > > the teleprompter are a huge deal, but Palin's palm notes can be waved > > off. > > > > > What's the big deal, Billy? Why is it acceptable for a person to take a > > > sheet of paper up to the podium but it's not ok to put two or three > > > words on one's hand? Have you ever done some formal public speaking? I > > > have....and it's not easy. > > > > You join the "Palin's palm notes are nothing" side, and then you get all > > offended because you get called for doing it? Not to mention being dumb > > enough to a k a college professor if they ever did any public speaking. > > Duh. > > A. I didn't criticize O for his teleprompter. Just because some in this > thread do doesn't mean I'm hypocritical for telling you/the reader that > writing on a palm is no big deal. > > B. I didn't claim you have no speaking experience. However, many don't and > it's not an easy task. When I post, it's not exclusively to you. I know > you're the center of the universe but try to visualize usenet as a bulletin > board. > > C. You had a chance to show some integrity. > > -Greg And you have a chance to show you have a titter of wit. You fail.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 10:36
In article <4b75ea2a$0$21064$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:40:46 +0000, assimilate wrote: > > On 11-Feb-2010, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Fact is the TEA party convention drew far fewer people than > >>>> anticipated, and even with Fox News cheerleading it for all it was > >>>> worth, it was pretty much a bust for anyone other than the loony > >>>> right rednecks. > >>> > >>> that's because the convention is not reflective of the nature of the > >>> movement, which is a bottom-up, decentralized affair. > >> > >> Right. With crib notes scrawled on the palm of your hand. I get it. > > > > Get your jolies while you can, 2010 will be ugly for you lefties. > > You know Bill, I think you're right. But Obama will still win a second > term. I think it may well be that success for the loony right in 2010 may well be all it takes to frighten the electorate back to reason by 2012. |