Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 10:41 In article <MPG.25dfa8f91873395b989baa(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989ba8(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <clark-DE7AEC.14535912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.25df7149b23ee212989ba6(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In article <clark-9ED013.14013712022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > Kept the spelling phonetic for him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe you should have gone to Harvard or Yale. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not where the dictionaries come from. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Over here we have commercialized dictionaries. > > > > > > > > > > > > Indeed, sacrificing accuracy for profit again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Profits keep people employed. > > > > > > > > But not, apparently, literate. > > > > > > Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? > > > > Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. Really.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 10:43 In article <4b75eca0$0$5077$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote: > > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989ba8(a)news.giganews.com>, > >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? > >> > >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. > > You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton > agrees with you. And bragging about (supposedly) having money is a sign of no class. Like pretending to have proof that your soul mate published in journals in a field he doesn't know anything about.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 10:44 In article <4b75ec0f$0$5100$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:15:17 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> > >>> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as > >>> dumb as paint. > >> > >> Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or > >> the American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's > > intelligence. What a boob. > > So, where do you feel you fit on the great bellcurve? Ahead of Clark? > Obama? How about Palin? Actually I might spot you that last one. Yes, Moderate and intelligence do not sit well together.
From: Carbon on 13 Feb 2010 11:05 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: >>> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>> news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr >>>> <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and he's a >>>> lightweight. She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. >>> >>> In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben. >> >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. Obama is nothing > more than a talking head. He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 13 Feb 2010 12:09
On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article > <5e353fb8-3c85-4195-9a10-94a54f990...(a)u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 11:32 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > state.edu> wrote: > > > In article > > > <3cebfbd0-3631-4c3a-a13d-daa58a9cd...(a)q27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 12, 11:12 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > > > > > On 12-Feb-2010, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as > > > > > > > >dumb > > > > > > > > >as paint. > > > > > > > > I can't wait to see your Yale degree or your Harvard degree. > > > > > > > Actually, it's from Oxford. Game, set, and match. > > > > > > it is a piece of paper & will not substitute for wisdom or character. > > > > > > -- > > > > > bill-o > > > > > Oxford is no big deal anyways. 3 years to get a Ph.D. You go to a > > > > lecture now and then and write some sort of paper at the end of the > > > > year and if the good ole boys like it, you advance. Totally lame, and > > > > outdated, at least in science. An Ohio State Ph.D. in science prepares > > > > you 1000X better than does Oxford. > > > > Of course. Except that Oxford doesn't give Ph. Ds, it gives D. Phils. > > > Can't expect you to know that, though, just like your "materials > > > science" journal publications. You are a self proclaimed expert on > > > everything, and master of nothing. > > > I suppose you need BS like that to fall back on when all else has > > been lost! No doubt they don't give B.Sc's either, they give "Science > > Baccalaureates"! > > Dino, this is simply pathetic - even for you. Really? Again, if that sort of BS is all you got to fall back on, you are the one who is pathetic. I'm not claiming anything other than Oxford is, and has been no big deal in science for quite some time, which is a fact to me. |