Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 13 Feb 2010 12:10 On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > state.edu> wrote: > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state..edu... > > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - he's as > > > > dumb > > > > > > >> as paint. > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, Kerry, or > > > > the > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other people's > > > > > > intelligence. What a boob. > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find some. > > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > > -Greg > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in > > any context! > > Get back on your meds - quickly. So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a frightening indictment of the British electorate.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 13 Feb 2010 12:11 On Feb 13, 10:43 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article <4b75eca0$0$5077$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote: > > > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > >> BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? > > > >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. > > > You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton > > agrees with you. > > And bragging about (supposedly) having money is a sign of no class. Like > pretending to have proof that your soul mate published in journals in a > field he doesn't know anything about. Kinda like some fool claiming that he is an accomplished person because of the name of the school that gave him a degree. I, OTOH, have actually published in the area of materials science, and that fact for some reason bothers you...which can only mean you are envious!
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 13 Feb 2010 12:14 On Feb 13, 11:05 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > >>>> You're kidding. Biden wasted Palin in debate, and he's a > >>>> lightweight. She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > >>> In your dreams. Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. Obama is nothing > > more than a talking head. He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 12:23 In article <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97ccad8(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > On Feb 13, 10:39�am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > wrote: > > In article > > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 12, 2:01�pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > > > �"dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > > message > > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > > > �"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.ed > > > > > > > >u... > > > > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - > > > > > > > >> he's as > > > > > dumb > > > > > > > >> as paint. > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, > > > > > > > > Kerry, or > > > > > the > > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other > > > > > > > people's > > > > > > > intelligence. �What a boob. > > > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find > > > > > > some. > > > > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in > > > any context! > > > > Get back on your meds - quickly. > > So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a > frightening indictment of the British electorate. No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You are becoming delusionally schizophrenic.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 12:26
In article <b8033c9b-c8e1-42a5-9512-80e740b82bdd(a)15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > On Feb 13, 10:43�am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > wrote: > > In article <4b75eca0$0$5077$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > �Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote: > > > > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > >> �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? > > > > > >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > > > > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. > > > > > You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton > > > agrees with you. > > > > And bragging about (supposedly) having money is a sign of no class. Like > > pretending to have proof that your soul mate published in journals in a > > field he doesn't know anything about. > > Kinda like some fool claiming that he is an accomplished person > because of the name of the school that gave him a degree. I, OTOH, > have actually published in the area of materials science, and that > fact for some reason bothers you...which can only mean you are envious! No, you have not. Fourth author in a chemistry proceedings of a conference you didn't even go to is absolutely NOT a materials science publication. Any more than mine in the IADR Proceedings makes me a dentist. Poor effort on your part. You suffer from a serious inferiority complex, that means your life is devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down anyone with even modest achievements in life. How very sad. |