Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 12:28 In article <b19f4efa-7bb1-4b8f-a32b-cda057bc9fc7(a)g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > On Feb 13, 10:39�am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > wrote: > > In article > > <5e353fb8-3c85-4195-9a10-94a54f990...(a)u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 12, 11:32�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <3cebfbd0-3631-4c3a-a13d-daa58a9cd...(a)q27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > �Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 12, 11:12�am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote: > > > > > > On 12-Feb-2010, William Clark > > > > > > <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - > > > > > > > > >he's as > > > > > > > > >dumb > > > > > > > > > > >as paint. > > > > > > > > > > I can't wait to see your Yale degree or your Harvard degree. > > > > > > > > > Actually, it's from Oxford. Game, set, and match. > > > > > > > > it is a piece of paper & will not substitute for wisdom or > > > > > > character. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > bill-o > > > > > > > Oxford is no big deal anyways. 3 years to get a Ph.D. You go to a > > > > > lecture now and then and write some sort of paper at the end of the > > > > > year and if the good ole boys like it, you advance. Totally lame, and > > > > > outdated, at least in science. An Ohio State Ph.D. in science > > > > > prepares > > > > > you 1000X better than does Oxford. > > > > > > Of course. Except that Oxford doesn't give Ph. Ds, it gives D. Phils. > > > > Can't expect you to know that, though, just like your "materials > > > > science" journal publications. You are a self proclaimed expert on > > > > everything, and master of nothing. > > > > > �I suppose you need BS like that to fall back on when all else has > > > been lost! No doubt they don't give B.Sc's either, they give "Science > > > Baccalaureates"! > > > > Dino, this is simply pathetic - even for you. > > Really? Again, if that sort of BS is all you got to fall back on, you > are the one who is pathetic. I'm not claiming anything other than > Oxford is, and has been no big deal in science for quite some time, > which is a fact to me. Well, that might warrant a rebuttal if it came from a scientist, but from someone with no funded research and only eight "publications", it is like having a gnat land on your neck. Swatted away in a second. Sad again.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 12:29 In article <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > On Feb 13, 11:05�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > >>>> You're kidding. �Biden wasted Palin in debate, �and he's a > > >>>> lightweight. �She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > > > >>> In your dreams. �Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to > > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing > > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. �Obama is nothing > > > more than a talking head. �He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader?
From: BAR on 13 Feb 2010 13:01 In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article > <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 13, 11:05�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> You're kidding. �Biden wasted Palin in debate, �and he's a > > > >>>> lightweight. �She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > > > > > >>> In your dreams. �Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to > > > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing > > > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. �Obama is nothing > > > > more than a talking head. �He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. > > > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > > Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? Why not ask Barbara Boxer?
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 14:13 In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article > > <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 13, 11:05�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > > > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > > > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>> You're kidding. �Biden wasted Palin in debate, �and he's a > > > > >>>> lightweight. �She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > > > > > > > >>> In your dreams. �Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > > > > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to > > > > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing > > > > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > > > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. �Obama is nothing > > > > > more than a talking head. �He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > > > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > > > > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. > > > > > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > > > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > > > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > > > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > > > > Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > > scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > > Why not ask Barbara Boxer? Because I am asking you.
From: bknight on 13 Feb 2010 14:47
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> >> In article >> <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, >> > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a >> > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that >> > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. >> >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > >Why not ask Barbara Boxer? An absolutely great comparison. Neither of them is qualified to run for president. BK |