Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 13 Feb 2010 17:21 In article <wclark2-9805B4.14134813022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > In article > > > <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 11:05�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > > > > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > > > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > > > > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > > > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>>> You're kidding. �Biden wasted Palin in debate, �and he's a > > > > > >>>> lightweight. �She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple minds. > > > > > > > > > > >>> In your dreams. �Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > > > > > > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed to > > > > > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without embarrassing > > > > > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > > > > > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. �Obama is nothing > > > > > > more than a talking head. �He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > > > > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > > > > > > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. > > > > > > > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > > > > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > > > > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > > > > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > > > > > > Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > > > scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > > > > Why not ask Barbara Boxer? > > Because I am asking you. Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good enough for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone?
From: BAR on 13 Feb 2010 17:22 In article <qb0en5pduun3bio73t7b59jqaou89hjkic(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> > >> In article > >> <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > >> > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > >> > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > >> > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > >> > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > >> > >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > > > >Why not ask Barbara Boxer? > > An absolutely great comparison. Neither of them is qualified to run > for president. Did you get hit by the power outages?
From: bknight on 13 Feb 2010 17:36 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:22:27 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In article <qb0en5pduun3bio73t7b59jqaou89hjkic(a)4ax.com>, >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >> >state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >> >> >> >> In article >> >> <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, >> >> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >> >> >> > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, >> >> > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a >> >> > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that >> >> > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. >> >> >> >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without >> >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? >> > >> >Why not ask Barbara Boxer? >> >> An absolutely great comparison. Neither of them is qualified to run >> for president. > >Did you get hit by the power outages? 13 hours. bk
From: Jack Hollis on 13 Feb 2010 19:35 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:02:22 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >If you look at spending in 2006 and compare it to now? People are >really scared that the govt is destroying the economy. Now if the dems >would say, for example, the economy is sufficiently recovered that we >do not have to spend the 500 billion of the stimulus that is unspent, >and not propose any other sort of govt spending program, they would be >OK, but as we all know, they won't do this. > >Thus even people like Fiengold, who should be golden, and Gillibrand, >who should be OK, are are on the table, and if they go, the dems could >lose a lot more than 7 in the senate, and the house could be a >bloodbath. It would be best if the Democrats lose seats in both Houses of Congress but not enough to take control. A repeat of what happened in 1994 would make it more likely that Obama will be re-elected. Besides, even if the Republicans took over they couldn't do anything because of the filibuster and Obama's veto. So it's best if the Republicans pick up five to seven seats in the Senate to insure that the Democrats never get 60 votes on any objectionable legislation (the current 41 seats is a bit precarious) and finish the job in 2012.
From: Jack Hollis on 13 Feb 2010 19:39
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > >Why not ask Barbara Boxer That was Diane Feinstein. I'm afraid it was me who falsely accused Barbara Boxer of bringing cheat notes on her hand to a debate. |