Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 21:53 In article <MPG.25e0f00f67ae0047989bb6(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-9805B4.14134813022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <MPG.25e0b2f129e9b2f4989bb5(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > In article > > > > <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 11:05�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:18:11 -0600, Moderate wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:4b7497cf$0$5110$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:19:44 -0800, dene wrote: > > > > > > >>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > > > > > >>>news:heu8n5t5m6bopoc55sburstujj9897ii1t(a)4ax.com... > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:23 -0800 (PST), Dinosaur_Sr > > > > > > >>>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> You're kidding. �Biden wasted Palin in debate, �and he's a > > > > > > >>>> lightweight. �She's a joke that is riding a wave of simple > > > > > > >>>> minds. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> In your dreams. �Palin did just fine with Blabben. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> She was drilled night and day going into the debate and managed > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > >> repeat a bunch of memorized sound bites, mostly without > > > > > > >> embarrassing > > > > > > >> herself. It's not like she did well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I guess that qualifies her to be President. �Obama is > > > > > > > nothing > > > > > > > more than a talking head. �He is the Commander in Chief, yet he > > > > > > > doesn't know what a Corpsman is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Watch the recent live unscripted debate between Obama and the GOP. > > > > > > > > > > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > > > > > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > > > > > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > > > > > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > > > > > > > > Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > > > > scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > > > > > > Why not ask Barbara Boxer? > > > > Because I am asking you. > > Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good enough > for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone? So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good.
From: William Clark on 13 Feb 2010 21:54 In article <4dhen5dlao75ars4khjfhu9ig4vk0vhkme(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > > > >Why not ask Barbara Boxer > > That was Diane Feinstein. I'm afraid it was me who falsely accused > Barbara Boxer of bringing cheat notes on her hand to a debate. Yes, well, it is ol' Bertie after all, Can't expect silly things like actual facts to get in the way of trying to defend the SarahQuitter, can we?
From: assimilate on 14 Feb 2010 02:59 On 13-Feb-2010, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Things will have to get a whole lot better in a hurry. Clinton had a > > good > > economy going for him in 92. W/o a similar wind at his back Obama has > > little > > chance. > > > > -- > > bill-o > > If there had been a good economy in '92, Clinton wouldn't have been > elected. sorry, meant '96 -- bill-o
From: BAR on 14 Feb 2010 07:49 In article <9baen5drql2acmji90j175tjok5tqiga84(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:22:27 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <qb0en5pduun3bio73t7b59jqaou89hjkic(a)4ax.com>, > >bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >> > >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:01:11 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <wclark2-3D25E9.12292413022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >> >state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >> >> > >> >> In article > >> >> <de2e5548-0783-4608-a88a-d906c877ba54(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, > >> >> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >> > >> >> > Debate? A debate has a form, that was one person asking a question, > >> >> > another replying and then moving on to some other question. Hardly a > >> >> > debate. In that form there is no viewpoint expressed other than that > >> >> > of the person answering the questions. A joke maybe, but no debate. > >> >> > >> >> Then how come SarahQuitter couldn't manage even a scripted Q&A without > >> >> scrawling notes on her palm like some 3rd grader? > >> > > >> >Why not ask Barbara Boxer? > >> > >> An absolutely great comparison. Neither of them is qualified to run > >> for president. > > > >Did you get hit by the power outages? > > 13 hours. That's not too bad, glad you survived it.
From: BAR on 14 Feb 2010 07:57
In article <wclark2-56C41F.21534213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good enough > > for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone? > > So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good. > Keep wasting your time calling her names. |