Tom Tancredo
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 14 Feb 2010 10:57 In article <MPG.25e1bd3a2801ed6c989bbb(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-56C41F.21534213022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > Again, missing the point Billy. If writing on your hand is good enough > > > for Barbara Boxer it should be good enough for everyone? > > > > So you do agree about SarahQuitter, then? Good. > > > > Keep wasting your time calling her names. You have to try to change the subject every time, so I am taking that as a "yes".
From: dene on 14 Feb 2010 13:15 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>>>> And the only people saying it was a "drubbing" are left wing > >>>>> blogs. The meeting they want to have on the 25th is just as > >>>>> bogus. Obama has stated he has no plans on starting over on > >>>>> healthcare. So whatever proposals are presented by the Repubs, > >>>>> they will be rejected. The people want a "do-over" on this and so > >>>>> do most Repubs. Obama will not allow that so basically it comes > >>>>> down to nothing more than more Obama Kabuki theater. > >>>> > >>>> Jesus. You guys say you've watched it. Are you all blind, or what? > >>> > >>> We dont have blinders on like you. > >> > >> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is > >> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an hour, > >> all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he not > >> fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very well. > >> It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and stupid. > > > > I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. > > I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are in > denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP will > never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television debate. > Read into that what you will. My read is that it's been the highlight of his presidency. -Greg
From: Carbon on 14 Feb 2010 13:30 On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:02 -0800, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>> >>>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is >>>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an >>>> hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he >>>> not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very >>>> well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and >>>> stupid. >>> >>> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. >> >> I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are in >> denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP will >> never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television >> debate. Read into that what you will. > > My read is that it's been the highlight of his presidency. It might seem that way to anyone who believed the narrative that he can't speak without a teleprompter.
From: BAR on 14 Feb 2010 18:56 In article <4b784131$0$4856$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:02 -0800, dene wrote: > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > >>> > >>>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is > >>>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an > >>>> hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did he > >>>> not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did very > >>>> well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous and > >>>> stupid. > >>> > >>> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. > >> > >> I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are in > >> denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP will > >> never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television > >> debate. Read into that what you will. > > > > My read is that it's been the highlight of his presidency. > > It might seem that way to anyone who believed the narrative that he > can't speak without a teleprompter. Obama is toast. His favorability will be in the 30's before too long.
From: Carbon on 14 Feb 2010 19:23
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:56:24 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <4b784131$0$4856$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:02 -0800, dene wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is >>>>>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an >>>>>> hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did >>>>>> he not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did >>>>>> very well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous >>>>>> and stupid. >>>>> >>>>> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. >>>> >>>> I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are >>>> in denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP >>>> will never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television >>>> debate. Read into that what you will. >>> >>> My read is that it's been the highlight of his presidency. >> >> It might seem that way to anyone who believed the narrative that he >> can't speak without a teleprompter. > > Obama is toast. His favorability will be in the 30's before too long. You haven't commented on Obama's performance in the recent live televised debate. Why is that? Could it be that you're so desperate to believe Obama is helpless without a teleprompter that you block out all evidence to the contrary? Perhaps your obvious bias is influencing your predictions about Obama's favorability ratings. |