From: William Clark on 15 Feb 2010 09:46 In article <MPG.25e314d4883cfd59989bc1(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <4b7893f6$0$5103$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:56:24 -0500, BAR wrote: > > > In article <4b784131$0$4856$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:02 -0800, dene wrote: > > >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >>> news:4b75eb36$0$5121$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:36:08 -0600, MNMikeW wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> No, Mike. According to the ceaseless Fox News narrative, Obama is > > >>>>>> helpless without a teleprompter. He debated the GOP for over an > > >>>>>> hour, all of them lined up with prepared questions. Not only did > > >>>>>> he not fall apart, he gave no ground whatsoever. In fact he did > > >>>>>> very well. It's that simple. The entire narrative is ridiculous > > >>>>>> and stupid. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I said he did very well. He by no means "drubbed" anyone. > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm glad you conceded that much. Most of your fellow travelers are > > >>>> in denial. As for how well he did, I'm 100% certain that the GOP > > >>>> will never, ever invite Obama to another unscripted live television > > >>>> debate. Read into that what you will. > > >>> > > >>> My read is that it's been the highlight of his presidency. > > >> > > >> It might seem that way to anyone who believed the narrative that he > > >> can't speak without a teleprompter. > > > > > > Obama is toast. His favorability will be in the 30's before too long. > > > > You haven't commented on Obama's performance in the recent live > > televised debate. Why is that? Could it be that you're so desperate to > > believe Obama is helpless without a teleprompter that you block out all > > evidence to the contrary? Perhaps your obvious bias is influencing your > > predictions about Obama's favorability ratings. > > Ok, I'll play. It was not a debate. It was a ask a quesiton and receive > an answer session. > > But, keeping giving yourself a one-handed accolade if that's what makes > you happy. One handed, because you need the other hand to write notes on like PalmPalin?
From: William Clark on 15 Feb 2010 09:48 In article <hlbhvm$ogd$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8aa022fe-a1f8-4dab-9e6f-f5117a10e0bb(a)f8g2000vba.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 12, 5:39 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > state.edu> wrote: > > In article <hl4fqq$ht...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > No, Tancredo's remark was about ways of denying minorities the vote. > > No, Mod's right. Tancredo said Obama owed his election to people who > couldn't read or write. I had no idea that illiterates made up 52% of > eligible voters! Learn something new every day. > > ****************************************************** > > Of course I am right. Clark is an idiot. And you are clearly incapable of rational extrapolation. If you can't see through the code, then you are even thicker than I thought.
From: Moderate on 15 Feb 2010 10:22 "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-C8DC8A.09483015022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hlbhvm$ogd$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8aa022fe-a1f8-4dab-9e6f-f5117a10e0bb(a)f8g2000vba.googlegroups.com... >> On Feb 12, 5:39 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> state.edu> wrote: >> > In article <hl4fqq$ht...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, >> > >> > No, Tancredo's remark was about ways of denying minorities the vote. >> >> No, Mod's right. Tancredo said Obama owed his election to people who >> couldn't read or write. I had no idea that illiterates made up 52% of >> eligible voters! Learn something new every day. >> >> ****************************************************** >> >> Of course I am right. Clark is an idiot. > > And you are clearly incapable of rational extrapolation. If you can't > see through the code, then you are even thicker than I thought. You have lost your mind.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 15 Feb 2010 10:50 On Feb 13, 12:23 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article > <b33ef4c0-206d-44a8-a5b2-84e3e97cc...(a)h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 10:39 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > > wrote: > > > In article > > > <6ea6aa0b-dd0f-4933-bfd0-2b763861e...(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > On Feb 12, 2:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > > In article <7tljlbFg5...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > > > message > > > > > >news:clark-13ED1E.09503912022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu.... > > > > > > > In article <hl3k94$33...(a)speranza.aioe.org>, > > > > > > > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > >news:7tjvqjFuvU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > >news:wclark2-C14662.20553411022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.ed > > > > > > > > >u... > > > > > > > > > >> Oh, bullshit, Jack. We've been over that again and again - > > > > > > > > >> he's as > > > > > > dumb > > > > > > > > >> as paint. > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm....what does that say about the intelligence of Gore, > > > > > > > > > Kerry, or > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > American electorate who elected this dummy. > > > > > > > > > I always enjoy watching idiots like Clark talk about other > > > > > > > > people's > > > > > > > > intelligence. What a boob. > > > > > > > > Yu and Intelligence don;t belong in the same sentence. Go find > > > > > > > some. > > > > > > > I'm waiting for an intelligent answer to my question, Clark. > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > Well, Bush is the one they elected (supposedly), so it is a frightening > > > > > indictment of the Americn electorate. > > > > > Hardly in the same league as electing any Labour Party candidate in > > > > any context! > > > > Get back on your meds - quickly. > > > So you agree with me that electing Labour party candidates is a > > frightening indictment of the British electorate. > > No, I agree that you need to start taking your medication again. You are > becoming delusionally schizophrenic. What qualifications do you presume to have to make such a diagnosis?
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 15 Feb 2010 10:53
On Feb 13, 12:26 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article > <b8033c9b-c8e1-42a5-9512-80e740b82...(a)15g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 10:43 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > > wrote: > > > In article <4b75eca0$0$5077$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:06:19 -0500, BAR wrote: > > > > > In article <clark-EDF568.17402212022...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > >> In article <MPG.25df7e125badc04a989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > >> BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> Literate and poor or ignorant and rich? > > > > > >> Well, you are ignorant, but I doubt you are rich. > > > > > > You'd be surprised how much this dumb ignorant idiot has. > > > > > You think money makes you a better person? Guess what, Paris Hilton > > > > agrees with you. > > > > And bragging about (supposedly) having money is a sign of no class. Like > > > pretending to have proof that your soul mate published in journals in a > > > field he doesn't know anything about. > > > Kinda like some fool claiming that he is an accomplished person > > because of the name of the school that gave him a degree. I, OTOH, > > have actually published in the area of materials science, and that > > fact for some reason bothers you...which can only mean you are envious! > > No, you have not. Fourth author in a chemistry proceedings of a > conference you didn't even go to is absolutely NOT a materials science > publication. Any more than mine in the IADR Proceedings makes me a > dentist. Poor effort on your part. > > You suffer from a serious inferiority complex, that means your life is > devoted to trying (unsuccessfully) to tear down anyone with even modest > achievements in life. How very sad. I see, so you found the ACS Symposium series presentation and publication! Nope, doesn't make me a chemist, nor a seamstress (- ster!) but silk is a material and the work done was in materials science. There is one other publication in a much more significant journal and another presentation at an international conference...I even have a picture of me with everyone at the conference! In any event, it remains interesting that you are so consumed by the fact that I have done a bit of work in the area of materials science! |