From: dene on 8 Dec 2009 21:49 "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message news:1a2c9cca-cfe2-41e9-be87-9fd882da6d59(a)d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... On Dec 8, 1:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <c4683b30-4dee-4231-8c57-939380dca...(a)r40g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along and we > > > didn't want to see it? Or is he just another flawed human that was > > > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > > > Absolutely... > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't actually > say that. > I though I just did... > I played hockey with a guy who, if all you knew of him was his on-ice > behaviour, everyone would assume was a jerk. But off the ice he was a > different person. Objection overruled... he's a punk, get over it. At times he's a nice punk, at times he is a generous punk, at times he does good things... but he's still a punk. ------------------------------------------------------- Not a good time for Baker. Two years ago, an AP reporter revealed that Larry did indeed live in a high end San Diego neighborhood. Baker claimed he didn't. Even when confronted with clear evidence, he claimed Larry was the pool boy. Now it's proven that Pitts was right about TW. LOL. -Greg
From: dene on 8 Dec 2009 21:52 "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message news:2edf42f9-b29b-41a9-a437-4dbc579b85ab(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On Dec 8, 9:22 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <bf9e31aa-35da-45f2-8243-d54ad3066...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 4:13 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > In article > > > <9b857161-28bc-41ae-9697-f6ceb2a27...(a)d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 3:21 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > > <1a2c9cca-cfe2-41e9-be87-9fd882da6...(a)d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 8, 1:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > <c4683b30-4dee-4231-8c57-939380dca...(a)r40g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along and > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > didn't want to see it? Or is he just another flawed human that > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > > > > > > > > > Absolutely... > > > > > > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > > > > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > say that. > > > > > > > I though I just did... > > > > > > > > I played hockey with a guy who, if all you knew of him was his > > > > > > > on-ice > > > > > > > behaviour, everyone would assume was a jerk. But off the ice he was > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > different person. > > > > > > > Objection overruled... he's a punk, get over it. At times he's a nice > > > > > > punk, at times he is a generous punk, at times he does good things... > > > > > > but he's still a punk. > > > > > > Nope. I don't know the man, and neither do you. > > > > > > He might be a punk, or he might just be an intense competitor who > > > > > wasn't > > > > > raised to have an irrational fear of words for normal human activities. > > > > > > -- > > > > > Alan Baker > > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide quoted > > > > > text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > I agree, he's a punk... > > > > Great. But all you're doing is showing your ignorance. > > > > You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity and who is it > > > really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the man. > > > Sure I'm ignorant about many things regarding Tiger. But I'm not > > entirely ignorant of his behavior on the course and now off the > > course. Do you need an anvil to hit you in the head to get the > > picture? > > Do you need one to know that you're only getting a very small, very > skewed part of the picture? > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> What has happened in the last week... is an anvil... it can't hit any harder. I'm sure it probably feels like an anvil to Tiger. It's a shame really. I wish he was closer to being the man everyone thought he was. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Women in several cities, yet TW's not a punk. Interesting set of morals this Baker has, huh? Rumor has it that Baker has couches in several Canadian cities. -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 8 Dec 2009 21:51 In article <2edf42f9-b29b-41a9-a437-4dbc579b85ab(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Dec 8, 9:22�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <bf9e31aa-35da-45f2-8243-d54ad3066...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 4:13�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <9b857161-28bc-41ae-9697-f6ceb2a27...(a)d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 3:21�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > > > > <1a2c9cca-cfe2-41e9-be87-9fd882da6...(a)d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 1:11�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > <c4683b30-4dee-4231-8c57-939380dca...(a)r40g2000yqn.googlegroups.c > > > > > > > > om>, > > > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > � The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > didn't want to see it? �Or is he just another flawed human > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely... > > > > > > > > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't > > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > > say that. > > > > > > > > > I though I just did... > > > > > > > > > > I played hockey with a guy who, if all you knew of him was his > > > > > > > > on-ice > > > > > > > > behaviour, everyone would assume was a jerk. But off the ice he > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > different person. > > > > > > > > > Objection overruled... he's a punk, get over it. At times he's a > > > > > > > nice > > > > > > > punk, at times he is a generous punk, at times he does good > > > > > > > things... > > > > > > > but he's still a punk. > > > > > > > > Nope. I don't know the man, and neither do you. > > > > > > > > He might be a punk, or he might just be an intense competitor who > > > > > > wasn't > > > > > > raised to have an irrational fear of words for normal human > > > > > > activities. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Alan Baker > > > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide > > > > > > quoted > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > I agree, he's a punk... > > > > > > Great. But all you're doing is showing your ignorance. > > > > > > You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity and who is > > > > it > > > > really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the man. > > > > > Sure I'm ignorant about many things regarding Tiger. But I'm not > > > entirely ignorant of his behavior on the course and now off the > > > course. Do you need an anvil to hit you in the head to get the > > > picture? > > > > Do you need one to know that you're only getting a very small, very > > skewed part of the picture? > > > > -- > > Alan Baker > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > What has happened in the last week... is an anvil... it can't hit any > harder. I'm sure it probably feels like an anvil to Tiger. It's a > shame really. I wish he was closer to being the man everyone thought > he was. You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close to being in his shoes. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dsc-ky on 8 Dec 2009 22:00 On Dec 8, 9:51 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <2edf42f9-b29b-41a9-a437-4dbc579b8...(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 9:22 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > In article > > > <bf9e31aa-35da-45f2-8243-d54ad3066...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 4:13 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > > <9b857161-28bc-41ae-9697-f6ceb2a27...(a)d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 8, 3:21 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > <1a2c9cca-cfe2-41e9-be87-9fd882da6...(a)d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 1:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > <c4683b30-4dee-4231-8c57-939380dca...(a)r40g2000yqn.googlegroups.c > > > > > > > > > om>, > > > > > > > > > > dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > didn't want to see it? Or is he just another flawed human > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely... > > > > > > > > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't > > > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > > > say that. > > > > > > > > > I though I just did... > > > > > > > > > > I played hockey with a guy who, if all you knew of him was his > > > > > > > > > on-ice > > > > > > > > > behaviour, everyone would assume was a jerk. But off the ice he > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > different person. > > > > > > > > > Objection overruled... he's a punk, get over it. At times he's a > > > > > > > > nice > > > > > > > > punk, at times he is a generous punk, at times he does good > > > > > > > > things... > > > > > > > > but he's still a punk. > > > > > > > > Nope. I don't know the man, and neither do you. > > > > > > > > He might be a punk, or he might just be an intense competitor who > > > > > > > wasn't > > > > > > > raised to have an irrational fear of words for normal human > > > > > > > activities. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Alan Baker > > > > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide > > > > > > > quoted > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > I agree, he's a punk... > > > > > > Great. But all you're doing is showing your ignorance. > > > > > > You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity and who is > > > > > it > > > > > really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the man. > > > > > Sure I'm ignorant about many things regarding Tiger. But I'm not > > > > entirely ignorant of his behavior on the course and now off the > > > > course. Do you need an anvil to hit you in the head to get the > > > > picture? > > > > Do you need one to know that you're only getting a very small, very > > > skewed part of the picture? > > > > -- > > > Alan Baker > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > > What has happened in the last week... is an anvil... it can't hit any > > harder. I'm sure it probably feels like an anvil to Tiger. It's a > > shame really. I wish he was closer to being the man everyone thought > > he was. > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close > to being in his shoes. Really... I do know... he's a liar he's an adulterer he's given to throwing fits he's a womanizer he's a great golfer From that I can tell he is not the man he appeared to be. I'm pretty sure he intended for us to think he was something other than what he is (pretending). As I said before this whole mess is a shame. I wish he hadn't done all these things. I doubt anything good can come from it.
From: Alan Baker on 8 Dec 2009 22:51
In article <5c4a075d-68ee-4439-a7a2-185966613abc(a)v7g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote: > On Dec 8, 9:51�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <2edf42f9-b29b-41a9-a437-4dbc579b8...(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 9:22�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <bf9e31aa-35da-45f2-8243-d54ad3066...(a)o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 4:13�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > In article > > > > > > <9b857161-28bc-41ae-9697-f6ceb2a27...(a)d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 3:21�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > <1a2c9cca-cfe2-41e9-be87-9fd882da6...(a)d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.c > > > > > > > > om>, > > > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 1:11�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > > <c4683b30-4dee-4231-8c57-939380dca...(a)r40g2000yqn.googlegrou > > > > > > > > > > ps.c > > > > > > > > > > om>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > � The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all > > > > > > > > > > > > along > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't want to see it? �Or is he just another flawed > > > > > > > > > > > > human > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely... > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you > > > > > > > > > > can't > > > > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > > > > say that. > > > > > > > > > > > I though I just did... > > > > > > > > > > > > I played hockey with a guy who, if all you knew of him was > > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > on-ice > > > > > > > > > > behaviour, everyone would assume was a jerk. But off the > > > > > > > > > > ice he > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > different person. > > > > > > > > > > > Objection overruled... he's a punk, get over it. At times > > > > > > > > > he's a > > > > > > > > > nice > > > > > > > > > punk, at times he is a generous punk, at times he does good > > > > > > > > > things... > > > > > > > > > but he's still a punk. > > > > > > > > > > Nope. I don't know the man, and neither do you. > > > > > > > > > > He might be a punk, or he might just be an intense competitor > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > wasn't > > > > > > > > raised to have an irrational fear of words for normal human > > > > > > > > activities. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Alan Baker > > > > > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- > > > > > > > > Hide > > > > > > > > quoted > > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > I agree, he's a punk... > > > > > > > > Great. But all you're doing is showing your ignorance. > > > > > > > > You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity and who > > > > > > is > > > > > > it > > > > > > really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the man. > > > > > > > Sure I'm ignorant about many things regarding Tiger. But I'm not > > > > > entirely ignorant of his behavior on the course and now off the > > > > > course. Do you need an anvil to hit you in the head to get the > > > > > picture? > > > > > > Do you need one to know that you're only getting a very small, very > > > > skewed part of the picture? > > > > > > -- > > > > Alan Baker > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > > > > What has happened in the last week... is an anvil... it can't hit any > > > harder. I'm sure it probably feels like an anvil to Tiger. It's a > > > shame really. I wish he was closer to being the man everyone thought > > > he was. > > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close > > to being in his shoes. > > > Really... I do know... > > he's a liar > he's an adulterer And do you know how man others are, or would be if they lived in his circumstances? Do you *know* that you wouldn't be? > he's given to throwing fits No. He's given to outbursts of temper. > he's a womanizer And you're not, or wouldn't be if you had the chance? Is this judgement, or just envy? > he's a great golfer > > From that I can tell he is not the man he appeared to be. I'm pretty > sure he intended for us to think he was something other than what he > is (pretending). > > As I said before this whole mess is a shame. I wish he hadn't done all > these things. I doubt anything good can come from it. Certainly you're not doing anything to help it. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |