From: David Laville on
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:11:08 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
wrote:

>> > � The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along and we
>> > didn't want to see it? �Or is he just another flawed human that was
>> > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while?
>>
>> Absolutely...
>>
>> BTW - Ken was right all along.
>
>Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't actually
>say that.

I see Alan Baker is still being the clown and hypocrite of RSG. He
didn't actually know Larry but his didn't stop him from running around
RSG trashing him. Come to think of it he doesn't actually know Ken
Pitts either but it doesn't stop his "seek and destroy Ken Pitts"
mission.

Claim you can hit a 2 iron 250 yards and Baker calls you a liar and
comes at you with vengeance.

Claim you tossed a club to the ground and Baker calls you a liar and
comes at you with vengeance.

A married man has affairs with 10+ women over a 2 year period and he
tells us we aren't to judge the man.


David Laville, G.S.E.M.
The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
From: David Laville on
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:49:48 -0600, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc>
wrote:

>> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion
>> on.
>
>Question.
>
>Tiger Woods cheated on his wife in myriad ways.
>
>George W. Bush launched a war on false pretenses.
>
>Who's the real villain? Why?

Liberal tactic #12 - when all else fails change the topic to George
Bush and the war.


David Laville, G.S.E.M.
The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
From: David Laville on
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:29:06 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
wrote:

>I just grow very tired of people who seem to validate their existence by
>taking cheap shots at easy targets.

Like the exhibition of cheap shots we saw you take at Larry?

Your hypocrisy has no bounds, does it?


David Laville, G.S.E.M.
The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
From: kenpitts on
On Dec 10, 8:03 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
>
> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and
> >move on... :)
>
> Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst.  When
> someone says this its almost always the other way around.
>
> You aren't playing with anyone.
>
> BK

Bobby, I will never understand why you side with Baker after the way
he has treated me.

Ken
From: dsc-ky on
On Dec 14, 11:21 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:15:06 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
>
>
>
>
>
> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> >On Dec 14, 10:40 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:27:55 -0800 (PST), kenpitts
>
> >> <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Dec 10, 8:03 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
>
> >> >> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> >> >> >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and
> >> >> >move on... :)
>
> >> >> Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst.  When
> >> >> someone says this its almost always the other way around.
>
> >> >> You aren't playing with anyone.
>
> >> >> BK
>
> >> >Bobby, I will never understand why you side with Baker after the way
> >> >he has treated me.
>
> >> >Ken
>
> >> You, as happens a lot, misunderstand that I'm not taking up for
> >> anyone.  I merely acknowledged that Dudley was wrong,
>
> >Well thank you ole wise one... what would we ever do without you to
> >set us all straight? :)
>
> You just don't get it.  It didn't take great wisdom to figure you out,
> and no one could ever set you straight.  You just know everything.


I never said I know everything. I never even said that I was
absolutely correct about anything regarding Tiger. I just stated a few
facts and expressed an opinion (or several opinions)... which really
seems to set you off for some unknown reason. Some things are facts
(pretty much indisputable)... he's a liar and a cheater for sure. He
has on course outbursts and fits, slams and tosses clubs. He's rich
and he's a great golfer (probably the best ever). Some things are
opinion... he's probably a punk (there is some evidence), but that is
open to debate. Maybe he's just a spoiked brat... what's the
difference? "Pitts was right" is also an opinion (with some evidence
to back it up), yet debatable. Of course that was also bait. That many
want to give him an excuse is also an opinion. Of course you are
welcome to have different opinions and express such here, as is
everyone. Just don't be so surprised if not everyone agree with you.

If anyone in RSG comes off as someone that knows everything... it
could easily be you. You also contradict yourself... by first saying
that you have to know Tiger very well to have a meaningful opinion,
then cite psychologists that don't know him as having the true
answers. They pretty much have the same info regarding Tiger that we
do. And you seem particularly fixated on me at the moment, even
ignoring others (for the most part) that share similar opinions to
mine. That's fine...