From: Alan Baker on
In article
<ec4e3a27-4ff1-41e0-a779-ddc6dce3cd8c(a)m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 10, 8:03�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
> >
> > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and
> > >move on... :)
> >
> > Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst. �When
> > someone says this its almost always the other way around.
> >
> > You aren't playing with anyone.
> >
> > BK
>
> Bobby, I will never understand why you side with Baker after the way
> he has treated me.
>
> Ken

That's because you imagine the whole world should revolve around you,
Ken.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message
> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com...
> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM:
> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > >
> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart enough
> > >> to know what they don't know.
> > >
> > > opinions are not knowledge
> >
> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and
> > excruciatingly common on Usenet.
>
> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion
> on.
>
> -Greg

No, there isn't actually.

What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article
<cf6ecf51-cc5d-48a1-923b-fc8775392bf3(a)a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:

> > > opinions are not knowledge
> >
> > No, but opinions are based on knowledge.
>
> Is that really what you meant to say? Would you like to qualify it in
> any way?

Nope. Opinions are based on knowledge. The difficulty comes when people
try and make more out of what is actually known than is supportable?

Did Tiger Woods cheat on his wife? Since he said he did, the answer is
almost certainly "Yes.", but is that enough to call him "punk"?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <80rdi5dc6vdlbe075hf9j621d28rhd4iim(a)4ax.com>,
David Laville <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:11:08 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >> > � The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along and we
> >> > didn't want to see it? �Or is he just another flawed human that was
> >> > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while?
> >>
> >> Absolutely...
> >>
> >> BTW - Ken was right all along.
> >
> >Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't actually
> >say that.
>
> I see Alan Baker is still being the clown and hypocrite of RSG. He
> didn't actually know Larry but his didn't stop him from running around
> RSG trashing him. Come to think of it he doesn't actually know Ken
> Pitts either but it doesn't stop his "seek and destroy Ken Pitts"
> mission.
>
> Claim you can hit a 2 iron 250 yards and Baker calls you a liar and
> comes at you with vengeance.

Does he? I'm curious to see where...

>
> Claim you tossed a club to the ground and Baker calls you a liar and
> comes at you with vengeance.

Actually, he claimed he didn't throw it at all, and I withdrew the term
"helicopter" with an apology. Something I never got from Ken (despite
his acknowledging privately that he owed me one).

>
> A married man has affairs with 10+ women over a 2 year period and he
> tells us we aren't to judge the man.

And see, there you are: you don't actually know that anything that you
just stated is a fact.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <vdtdi55r8ppr0b03hpkie440ltqcdisjb2(a)4ax.com>,
David Laville <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:29:06 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >I just grow very tired of people who seem to validate their existence by
> >taking cheap shots at easy targets.
>
> Like the exhibition of cheap shots we saw you take at Larry?

I didn't take any cheap shots at Larry. I used facts.

>
> Your hypocrisy has no bounds, does it?

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>