Was Pitts right?
in [Golf]
|
From: dene on 15 Dec 2009 02:40 "dsc-ky" <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote in message news:60fc11f7-c39b-4d60-9145-28cbcf3c7e1a(a)k32g2000prb.googlegroups.com... On Dec 14, 11:21 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:15:06 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky > > >> You, as happens a lot, misunderstand that I'm not taking up for > >> anyone. I merely acknowledged that Dudley was wrong, > > >Well thank you ole wise one... what would we ever do without you to > >set us all straight? :) > > You just don't get it. It didn't take great wisdom to figure you out, > and no one could ever set you straight. You just know everything. I never said I know everything. I never even said that I was absolutely correct about anything regarding Tiger. I just stated a few facts and expressed an opinion (or several opinions)... which really seems to set you off for some unknown reason. Some things are facts (pretty much indisputable)... he's a liar and a cheater for sure. He has on course outbursts and fits, slams and tosses clubs. He's rich and he's a great golfer (probably the best ever). Some things are opinion... he's probably a punk (there is some evidence), but that is open to debate. Maybe he's just a spoiked brat... what's the difference? "Pitts was right" is also an opinion (with some evidence to back it up), yet debatable. Of course that was also bait. That many want to give him an excuse is also an opinion. Of course you are welcome to have different opinions and express such here, as is everyone. Just don't be so surprised if not everyone agree with you. If anyone in RSG comes off as someone that knows everything... it could easily be you. You also contradict yourself... by first saying that you have to know Tiger very well to have a meaningful opinion, then cite psychologists that don't know him as having the true answers. They pretty much have the same info regarding Tiger that we do. And you seem particularly fixated on me at the moment, even ignoring others (for the most part) that share similar opinions to mine. That's fine... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Knit cannot deal with people who disagree with him, nor can he debate without insult and/or making a blanket statement that you're wrong/he's right, sans substance. Essentially, he's an old dog who cannot be trained to do anything else. Entertaining....and pathetic at the same time. -Greg
From: dene on 15 Dec 2009 02:42 "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ec4e3a27-4ff1-41e0-a779-ddc6dce3cd8c(a)m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On Dec 10, 8:03 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and > >move on... :) > > Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst. When > someone says this its almost always the other way around. > > You aren't playing with anyone. > > BK Bobby, I will never understand why you side with Baker after the way he has treated me. Ken -------------------------------------------------------- One thing that is interesting about Baker. The moment you appear, he attacks you about a promise you made years ago. However, his buddy Knit made a similar promise about not participating in political threads, and Baker has never said a word to him about it. Why is that??? Answer......hypocrisy. -Greg
From: dene on 15 Dec 2009 02:44 "David Laville" <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:80rdi5dc6vdlbe075hf9j621d28rhd4iim(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:11:08 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > >> > The bottom line is was Tiger an obnoxious jerk all along and we > >> > didn't want to see it? Or is he just another flawed human that was > >> > able to cover his flaws from the public... for a while? > >> > >> Absolutely... > >> > >> BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > >Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you can't actually > >say that. > > I see Alan Baker is still being the clown and hypocrite of RSG. He > didn't actually know Larry but his didn't stop him from running around > RSG trashing him. Come to think of it he doesn't actually know Ken > Pitts either but it doesn't stop his "seek and destroy Ken Pitts" > mission. > > Claim you can hit a 2 iron 250 yards and Baker calls you a liar and > comes at you with vengeance. > > Claim you tossed a club to the ground and Baker calls you a liar and > comes at you with vengeance. > > A married man has affairs with 10+ women over a 2 year period and he > tells us we aren't to judge the man. Don't forget troll, David. Good to see you here!! -Greg
From: dene on 15 Dec 2009 02:49 "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message news:vjidi5hrrciv8crr47gopmvrlsoqrvmb8v(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:49:48 -0600, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> > wrote: > > >Tiger Woods cheated on his wife in myriad ways. > > > >George W. Bush launched a war on false pretenses. > > > >Who's the real villain? Why? > > And Obama campaigned on changing George W. Bush's policies. You mean "hoax and chains." -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 02:45
In article <7oosm7F3qis1aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ec4e3a27-4ff1-41e0-a779-ddc6dce3cd8c(a)m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 10, 8:03 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky > > > > <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote: > > >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and > > >move on... :) > > > > Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst. When > > someone says this its almost always the other way around. > > > > You aren't playing with anyone. > > > > BK > > Bobby, I will never understand why you side with Baker after the way > he has treated me. > > Ken > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > One thing that is interesting about Baker. The moment you appear, he > attacks you about a promise you made years ago. However, his buddy Knit > made a similar promise about not participating in political threads, and > Baker has never said a word to him about it. > > Why is that??? > > Answer......hypocrisy. > > -Greg Sorry, Greg, but I've never seen that promise. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |