From: MNMikeW on

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-438217.22374714122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> In article
>
> Did Tiger Woods cheat on his wife? Since he said he did, the answer is
> almost certainly "Yes.", but is that enough to call him "punk"?
>
For a lot of people, YES!


From: Ken Meltzer on
On Dec 15, 12:52 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.25914215c8243bfa9898aa(a)news.giganews.com...
>
>
>
> > In article <alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122...(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > alangba...(a)telus.net says...
>
> > > > In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an
> opinion
> > > > on.
>
> > > > -Greg
>
> > > No, there isn't actually.
>
> > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
>
> > The court of public opinion is not based upon facts.
>
> Uh....uncle al, the kiddie's pal, consider this.
>
> 1.  Tiger used the word, "infidelity."  What does he mean by that?
>
> 2.  There are testimonies from 6+ women.  How many does it take to prove
> infidelity?
>
> 3.  If he's not an adulterer, do tell us why Elin is angry and why TW is
> quitting golf.
>
> -Greg

There is, of course, the possibility that this is all a ruse, and that
both sides are lying about the infidelity.
That seems to me to be a pretty radical action to take, just to avoid
playing the new conforming-groove irons, but there you have it.
Best,
Ken
From: Dene on
On Dec 15, 7:39 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:45:22 -0800, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <7oosm7F3qis1...(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>
> >> One thing that is interesting about Baker.  The moment you appear, he
> >> attacks you about a promise you made years ago.  However, his buddy Knit
> >> made a similar promise about not participating in political threads, and
> >> Baker has never said a word to him about it.
>
> >> Why is that???
>
> >> Answer......hypocrisy.
>
> >> -Greg
>
> >Sorry, Greg, but I've never seen that promise.
>
> Its true Alan.  I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political
> threads.  After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes,
> I reneged.
>
> Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but
> did.
>
> BK

All true, but neither you or me attack people regarding reneged
promises. That's uncle Al, the kiddy's pal, schtick.

-Greg
From: Dene on
On Dec 11, 2:14 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <dfd729c9-f1b7-41de-9d1a-521b78908...(a)13g2000prl.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 5:52 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <8a3b9544-2084-40a9-86d2-14711b77e...(a)u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >  Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 9, 6:00 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > > > In article <lrj0i5t0186ar6hvo2e97n6j1tgndcu...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > >  Loudon Briggs <lar...(a)bbz.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >In article <4820i5lr0g5obn3gashlg15pq7antgc...(a)4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > Loudon Briggs <lar...(a)bbz.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along.
>
> > > > > > >> >> > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, you
> > > > > > >> >> > > > can't
> > > > > > >> >> > > > actually
> > > > > > >> >> > > > say that.
>
> > > > > > >> >> > > I though I just did...
>
> > > > > > >> *******
> > > > > > >> >You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity and
> > > > > > >> >who is
> > > > > > >> >it
> > > > > > >> >really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the man.
> > > > > > >> *******
>
> > > > > > >> I think we're getting to know him better every day!
>
> > > > > > >That you think that is the problem.
>
> > > > > > Alan... at the top of your message, it indicates you're partially
> > > > > > responding to something I posted. There is nothing else in your
> > > > > > message even closely associated with anything I said.
>
> > > > > > Careless editing like that has often set off some of those arguments
> > > > > > on this Group that NOBODY ever wins. Unfortunately, "no editing" is
> > > > > > even more prevalent.
>
> > > > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand your objection.
>
> > > > > The fact that you really think you're gaining much insight into Tiger
> > > > > Woods' character is the problem. You're getting a tiny, much distorted
> > > > > (through the glass of a scandal-hungry media) slice and you think that
> > > > > you know something about Tiger Woods.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Alan Baker
> > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia
> > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide quoted
> > > > > text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > More of the same.  Baker disputes but doesn't offer a cite or specific
> > > > opinion in return.
>
> > > > -Greg
>
> > > More of the same, Greg declares it cowardly to talk about people he has
> > > killfiled, and then talks about me, whom he has in his killfile.
>
> > You're not KF'd on Google Groups.  Look at the post.  Big D means GG.
> > Little d means OE, which gives me the ability to plonk.
>
> What does that have to do with the fact that you declared talking about
> someone that is in one's killfile to be cowardly...
>
> ...and then proceeded to do it over and over.

How do you know if you're in my KF?

-Greg

From: Dene on
On Dec 15, 12:04 pm, Ken Meltzer <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 12:52 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:MPG.25914215c8243bfa9898aa(a)news.giganews.com...
>
> > > In article <alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122...(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > > alangba...(a)telus.net says...
>
> > > > > In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an
> > opinion
> > > > > on.
>
> > > > > -Greg
>
> > > > No, there isn't actually.
>
> > > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
>
> > > The court of public opinion is not based upon facts.
>
> > Uh....uncle al, the kiddie's pal, consider this.
>
> > 1.  Tiger used the word, "infidelity."  What does he mean by that?
>
> > 2.  There are testimonies from 6+ women.  How many does it take to prove
> > infidelity?
>
> > 3.  If he's not an adulterer, do tell us why Elin is angry and why TW is
> > quitting golf.
>
> > -Greg
>
> There is, of course, the possibility that this is all a ruse, and that
> both sides are lying about the infidelity.
> That seems to me to be a pretty radical action to take, just to avoid
> playing the new conforming-groove irons, but there you have it.
> Best,
> Ken- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Ken,

You just hijacked uncle Al's latest theory. Now he has to cook up
another one. Shame on you!

-Greg