Was Pitts right?
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 23:01 In article <7oq5ehF3r4nd8U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-438217.22374714122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article > > > > Did Tiger Woods cheat on his wife? Since he said he did, the answer is > > almost certainly "Yes.", but is that enough to call him "punk"? > > > For a lot of people, YES! And I don't think much of those people. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 15 Dec 2009 23:02 In article <c6488a53-5ad4-480f-b338-054c30bbc911(a)u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>, Dene <gdstrue(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Dec 11, 2:14�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <dfd729c9-f1b7-41de-9d1a-521b78908...(a)13g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 10, 5:52�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > In article > > > > <8a3b9544-2084-40a9-86d2-14711b77e...(a)u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > �Dene <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 9, 6:00�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > In article <lrj0i5t0186ar6hvo2e97n6j1tgndcu...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > > > �Loudon Briggs <lar...(a)bbz.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >In article <4820i5lr0g5obn3gashlg15pq7antgc...(a)4ax.com>, > > > > > > > > Loudon Briggs <lar...(a)bbz.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > BTW - Ken was right all along. > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Sorry, but since none of us actually know the man, > > > > > > > >> >> > > > you > > > > > > > >> >> > > > can't > > > > > > > >> >> > > > actually > > > > > > > >> >> > > > say that. > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > I though I just did... > > > > > > > > > >> ******* > > > > > > > >> >You think that it's OK, because Tiger Woods is a celebrity > > > > > > > >> >and > > > > > > > >> >who is > > > > > > > >> >it > > > > > > > >> >really hurting, but the fact remains that you don't know the > > > > > > > >> >man. > > > > > > > >> ******* > > > > > > > > > >> I think we're getting to know him better every day! > > > > > > > > > >That you think that is the problem. > > > > > > > > > Alan... at the top of your message, it indicates you're partially > > > > > > > responding to something I posted. There is nothing else in your > > > > > > > message even closely associated with anything I said. > > > > > > > > > Careless editing like that has often set off some of those > > > > > > > arguments > > > > > > > on this Group that NOBODY ever wins. Unfortunately, "no editing" > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > even more prevalent. > > > > > > > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand your objection. > > > > > > > > The fact that you really think you're gaining much insight into > > > > > > Tiger > > > > > > Woods' character is the problem. You're getting a tiny, much > > > > > > distorted > > > > > > (through the glass of a scandal-hungry media) slice and you think > > > > > > that > > > > > > you know something about Tiger Woods. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Alan Baker > > > > > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide > > > > > > quoted > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > More of the same. �Baker disputes but doesn't offer a cite or > > > > > specific > > > > > opinion in return. > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > More of the same, Greg declares it cowardly to talk about people he has > > > > killfiled, and then talks about me, whom he has in his killfile. > > > > > You're not KF'd on Google Groups. �Look at the post. �Big D means GG. > > > Little d means OE, which gives me the ability to plonk. > > > > What does that have to do with the fact that you declared talking about > > someone that is in one's killfile to be cowardly... > > > > ...and then proceeded to do it over and over. > > How do you know if you're in my KF? You stated I was, Greg. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: kenpitts on 15 Dec 2009 23:10 On Dec 15, 9:55 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article <rvfgi558oktdr3t23ruecfdkqti1e85...(a)4ax.com>, > David Laville <dglavi...(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:40:44 -0800, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Like the exhibition of cheap shots we saw you take at Larry? > > > >I didn't take any cheap shots at Larry. I used facts. > > > Really? Where are your facts he can't hit a 2 iron 250 yards? > > Where are yours that I ever said that? > > > Where > > are your facts he really wasn't a 8 handicap? > > He's admitted as much. Would you like to see the posts? IIRC, they were > on GolfRewound.com > > And his current handicap is listed as 17. > > > > > Come on big guy, lets see you lay those facts out for us........ > > There are a few we need from you first. > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> The game comes and goes. It has been documented that I had an under par round in an RSG event in 2002. My PB is -4 and that was also in a tounament. I was a 1 hdcp during the summer of 1997. I don't think I could break 80 any more. Ken
From: bknight on 15 Dec 2009 23:19 On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:58:26 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >In article <q7bfi5hqdjsgv9kat2q7g30m53epd3ubiu(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> Its true Alan. I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political >> threads. After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes, >> I reneged. >> >> Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but >> did. >And are you ashamed of that fact? Ken certainly isn't. His whole >attitude seems to be "Who cares if I gave my word?". > This has gotten a bit overstated IMO. I don't know of anyone who went so far as to have made an oath. Just statements of the moment. I'm not ashamed of changing my mind and I don't feel that Greg should be either. These things aren't important enough for sworn oaths. I don't recall what verbiage Ken used in his statement, but is it that important? BK
From: dene on 15 Dec 2009 23:24
"David Laville" <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:j2ggi51v4f5eltnt6ev6dmq1e4lgjbn6ud(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:44:17 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: > > >Don't forget troll, David. Good to see you here!! > > I came back to see what the lefties of RSG were saying about Tiger's > affairs and for some reason a cat seems to have gotten their tongues. > I also discovered that while I was away Bellsouth closed their news > server so I've been looking for one. Looks like I may have to use a > pay server since the public ones are inconsistent. Then again the > only group that interest me on Usenet is RSG so I don't know if it's > worth it. I may have to look into Google Groups. GG works fine. You just can't kill threads or plonk idiots with it. I use it whenever I'm on the laptop. -Greg |