From: dene on

"kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1a028604-71af-49fd-87cf-32e65c6b07c8(a)h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 15, 8:06 pm, David Laville <dglavi...(a)nospam.bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:21 -0800 (PST), kenpitts
>
> <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >David, I want this to be complete. Baker claimed I helicoptered my
> >putter and put people in danger.
>
> Was Baker in your group? Did he see you toss the putter or did
> someone tell him?
>
> David Laville, G.S.E.M.
> The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor

It happened on the 18th green. Baker and some of the other players who
had already finished were gathered around.

I will admit that I over-reacted to his depiction and had to get some
help with reconstruction from Newell. For whatever reason, Baker has
done nothing but attack me since and attempts to refute any opinion I
offer on any subject. It has been six years now.

Ken

------------------------------------------------------

It just shows there is no difference between his cyber and real life
personna. Had Tex or Newt done this, he'd been quiet about it. Same with
Knit reneging a promise. He doesn't ring his bell because they are on the
same side, politically and morally.

-Greg


From: Alan Baker on
In article <4ingi5t17geekcbnk8p55d7a6i3jbirfbu(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:58:26 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <q7bfi5hqdjsgv9kat2q7g30m53epd3ubiu(a)4ax.com>,
> > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> >> Its true Alan. I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political
> >> threads. After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes,
> >> I reneged.
> >>
> >> Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but
> >> did.
>
> >And are you ashamed of that fact? Ken certainly isn't. His whole
> >attitude seems to be "Who cares if I gave my word?".
> >
> This has gotten a bit overstated IMO. I don't know of anyone who went
> so far as to have made an oath. Just statements of the moment. I'm
> not ashamed of changing my mind and I don't feel that Greg should be
> either. These things aren't important enough for sworn oaths. I
> don't recall what verbiage Ken used in his statement, but is it that
> important?
>
> BK

I think it is.

Ken wanted people to treat him differently and in order to get that he
offered to behave differently.

Now that he's got what he wants he's not keeping up his end.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <7or5kaF3r97j4U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "kenpitts" <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1a028604-71af-49fd-87cf-32e65c6b07c8(a)h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15, 8:06 pm, David Laville <dglavi...(a)nospam.bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:21 -0800 (PST), kenpitts
> >
> > <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >David, I want this to be complete. Baker claimed I helicoptered my
> > >putter and put people in danger.
> >
> > Was Baker in your group? Did he see you toss the putter or did
> > someone tell him?
> >
> > David Laville, G.S.E.M.
> > The Golfing Machine Authorized Instructor
>
> It happened on the 18th green. Baker and some of the other players who
> had already finished were gathered around.
>
> I will admit that I over-reacted to his depiction and had to get some
> help with reconstruction from Newell. For whatever reason, Baker has
> done nothing but attack me since and attempts to refute any opinion I
> offer on any subject. It has been six years now.
>
> Ken
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> It just shows there is no difference between his cyber and real life
> personna. Had Tex or Newt done this, he'd been quiet about it. Same with
> Knit reneging a promise. He doesn't ring his bell because they are on the
> same side, politically and morally.
>
> -Greg

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message
> >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com...
> >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM:
> >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart
enough
> >> > >> to know what they don't know.
> >> > >
> >> > > opinions are not knowledge
> >> >
> >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and
> >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet.
> >>
> >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an
> >> opinion
> >> on.
> >>
> >> -Greg
> >
> > No, there isn't actually.
> >
> > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
> >
> What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of
bimbos
> on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact? What about the
> published text messages? What about the soon to be released pics?

I'm soooo tempted to unplonk uncle Al and see what ridiculous answer he
presents.

Nah.....not worth it.

-Greg


From: Alan Baker on
In article <7or64aF3mlk7hU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> news:7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> > news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message
> > >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com...
> > >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM:
> > >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart
> enough
> > >> > >> to know what they don't know.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > opinions are not knowledge
> > >> >
> > >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and
> > >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet.
> > >>
> > >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an
> > >> opinion
> > >> on.
> > >>
> > >> -Greg
> > >
> > > No, there isn't actually.
> > >
> > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
> > >
> > What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of
> bimbos
> > on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact? What about the
> > published text messages? What about the soon to be released pics?
>
> I'm soooo tempted to unplonk uncle Al and see what ridiculous answer he
> presents.

Didn't you just as how I knew I was in your killfile (implying that
perhaps I was making it up)?

>
> Nah.....not worth it.

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>