Was Pitts right?
in [Golf]
|
From: bknight on 16 Dec 2009 09:50 On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:14:23 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer <commspkmn(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Dec 16, 9:00�am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer >> >> <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >If you use Firefox as your web browser, you can use an add-on called >> >Greasemonkey that allows you to filter both individual posters and >> >complete threads in Google Groups. >> >Best, >> >Ken >> >> But then one couldn't boast about kill filing a person on one >> computer, yet be able to read everything he posts on another. �:-) >> >> BK > >Of course you can! You can just say that your home computer has >Firefox, but you can't use that browser on your work computer. >Anything is possible. >Best, >Ken Duh! What was I thinking? :-)
From: MNMikeW on 16 Dec 2009 11:19 "David Laville" <dglaville(a)nospam.bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:j2ggi51v4f5eltnt6ev6dmq1e4lgjbn6ud(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:44:17 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: > >>Don't forget troll, David. Good to see you here!! > > I came back to see what the lefties of RSG were saying about Tiger's > affairs and for some reason a cat seems to have gotten their tongues. > I also discovered that while I was away Bellsouth closed their news > server so I've been looking for one. Looks like I may have to use a > pay server since the public ones are inconsistent. Then again the > only group that interest me on Usenet is RSG so I don't know if it's > worth it. I may have to look into Google Groups. > Individual.net - cheap and very reliable.
From: MNMikeW on 16 Dec 2009 12:00 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-3D792D.20284715122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <4ingi5t17geekcbnk8p55d7a6i3jbirfbu(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:58:26 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <q7bfi5hqdjsgv9kat2q7g30m53epd3ubiu(a)4ax.com>, >> > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >> >> Its true Alan. I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in political >> >> threads. After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, yes, >> >> I reneged. >> >> >> >> Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, but >> >> did. >> >> >And are you ashamed of that fact? Ken certainly isn't. His whole >> >attitude seems to be "Who cares if I gave my word?". >> > >> This has gotten a bit overstated IMO. I don't know of anyone who went >> so far as to have made an oath. Just statements of the moment. I'm >> not ashamed of changing my mind and I don't feel that Greg should be >> either. These things aren't important enough for sworn oaths. I >> don't recall what verbiage Ken used in his statement, but is it that >> important? >> >> BK > > I think it is. > You seriously need to get a life.
From: MNMikeW on 16 Dec 2009 12:02 "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message news:7orguaF3rhiutU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message > news:paidnYA4v9_x6bXWnZ2dnUVZ_uJi4p2d(a)supernews.com... >> bknight(a)conramp.net wrote, On 12/15/09 10:19 PM: >> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:58:26 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> In article <q7bfi5hqdjsgv9kat2q7g30m53epd3ubiu(a)4ax.com>, >> >> bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> > >> >>> Its true Alan. I told Pflum that I'd stop being involved in >> >>> political >> >>> threads. After a while it was either that or just leave RSG. So, >> >>> yes, >> >>> I reneged. >> >>> >> >>> Sorta like when Greg left RSG and swore that he'd never come back, >> >>> but >> >>> did. >> > >> >> And are you ashamed of that fact? Ken certainly isn't. His whole >> >> attitude seems to be "Who cares if I gave my word?". >> >> >> > This has gotten a bit overstated IMO. I don't know of anyone who went >> > so far as to have made an oath. Just statements of the moment. I'm >> > not ashamed of changing my mind and I don't feel that Greg should be >> > either. These things aren't important enough for sworn oaths. I >> > don't recall what verbiage Ken used in his statement, but is it that >> > important? >> >> In RSG, ***EVERYTHING*** is that important. >> >> I'm beginning to develop a slight affection for the group >> neurosis that infects this place. >> >> cb > > Typical winter nonsense. We all need fresh air. Nonetheless, Bobby is > spot > on. I meant my oath at the time, as did he, and Pitts. Life can be > fluid. > > -Greg > > Plenty of fresh air up here Greg. VERY refreshing.
From: MNMikeW on 16 Dec 2009 12:03
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-06C4E1.20013615122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com... >> > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> > >> >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message >> >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com... >> >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM: >> >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart >> >> > >> enough >> >> > >> to know what they don't know. >> >> > > >> >> > > opinions are not knowledge >> >> > >> >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and >> >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet. >> >> >> >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an >> >> opinion >> >> on. >> >> >> >> -Greg >> > >> > No, there isn't actually. >> > >> > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em! >> > >> What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of >> bimbos >> on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact? > > It's a fact they're on the morning shows, but that doesn't make what > they are claiming fact. > >> What about the >> published text messages? > > What about 'em? They are some facts, and I've not denied there are some > facts out there. What I've said is that they are far from the whole > story of a man. > > I don't think "there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion on". > >> What about the soon to be released pics? > > "soon to be released" is another way of saying "not yet facts". > Your analness is astounding. |