From: dene on 16 Dec 2009 12:12 "Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:2f446af1-521b-442e-ac63-7921045c02d1(a)g12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... On Dec 16, 9:00 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer > > <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote: > >If you use Firefox as your web browser, you can use an add-on called > >Greasemonkey that allows you to filter both individual posters and > >complete threads in Google Groups. > >Best, > >Ken > > But then one couldn't boast about kill filing a person on one > computer, yet be able to read everything he posts on another. :-) > > BK Always happy to annoy you from afar, Knit. Thanks for the tip, Ken. I love FireFox. I'll d/l greasemonkey today. -Greg
From: dene on 16 Dec 2009 12:13 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.2592a32bf71fa68c9898b7(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <alangbaker-69826D.19571415122009(a)news.shawcable.com>, > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > In article <7oq0dqF3rhrqrU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > news:MPG.25914215c8243bfa9898aa(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > In article <alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an > > > opinion > > > > > > on. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > > > No, there isn't actually. > > > > > > > > > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em! > > > > > > > > The court of public opinion is not based upon facts. > > > > > > Uh....uncle al, the kiddie's pal, consider this. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > What do you mean by that, Greg? > > What do you think he means? Rowen and Martin. Look it up, uncle Al. -Greg
From: dene on 16 Dec 2009 12:18 "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:7osi6oF3rnhttU3(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-06C4E1.20013615122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message > >> >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com... > >> >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM: > >> >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart > >> >> > >> enough > >> >> > >> to know what they don't know. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > opinions are not knowledge > >> >> > > >> >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and > >> >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet. > >> >> > >> >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an > >> >> opinion > >> >> on. > >> >> > >> >> -Greg > >> > > >> > No, there isn't actually. > >> > > >> > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em! > >> > > >> What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of > >> bimbos > >> on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact? > > > > It's a fact they're on the morning shows, but that doesn't make what > > they are claiming fact. > > > >> What about the > >> published text messages? > > > > What about 'em? They are some facts, and I've not denied there are some > > facts out there. What I've said is that they are far from the whole > > story of a man. > > > > I don't think "there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion on". > > > >> What about the soon to be released pics? > > > > "soon to be released" is another way of saying "not yet facts". > > > Your analness is astounding. There is only two logical conclusions. He's trolling or incredible stupid. -Greg
From: Ken Meltzer on 16 Dec 2009 14:37 On Dec 16, 12:12 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Ken Meltzer" <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > news:2f446af1-521b-442e-ac63-7921045c02d1(a)g12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 16, 9:00 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer > > > <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >If you use Firefox as your web browser, you can use an add-on called > > >Greasemonkey that allows you to filter both individual posters and > > >complete threads in Google Groups. > > >Best, > > >Ken > > > But then one couldn't boast about kill filing a person on one > > computer, yet be able to read everything he posts on another. :-) > > > BK > > Always happy to annoy you from afar, Knit. > > Thanks for the tip, Ken. I love FireFox. I'll d/l greasemonkey today. > > -Greg I think you'll like it, Greg. It's made navigating via Google much more manageable. Best, Ken (still cleaning the mud off after nine in Atlanta today)
From: Carbon on 16 Dec 2009 18:53
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:55:29 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <iMidnfZdUbiZ67XWnZ2dnUVZ_rZi4p2d(a)supernews.com>, > ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says... >> kenpitts wrote, On 12/15/09 10:34 PM: >> >>> Obama must be very evil because he is hitting a home run when it >>> comes to bringing Republicans back to power. >> >> The jury is still out on that, but based on what Joe Lieberman did >> this week, I think you very well may be right -- except for one >> thing. He's not evil, he's just failing. > > Obama is evil. He hates people who succeed on their own merit, > regardless of their skin color. You're paranoid. |