From: dene on

"Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:2f446af1-521b-442e-ac63-7921045c02d1(a)g12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 16, 9:00 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer
>
> <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >If you use Firefox as your web browser, you can use an add-on called
> >Greasemonkey that allows you to filter both individual posters and
> >complete threads in Google Groups.
> >Best,
> >Ken
>
> But then one couldn't boast about kill filing a person on one
> computer, yet be able to read everything he posts on another. :-)
>
> BK

Always happy to annoy you from afar, Knit.

Thanks for the tip, Ken. I love FireFox. I'll d/l greasemonkey today.

-Greg


From: dene on

"BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2592a32bf71fa68c9898b7(a)news.giganews.com...
> In article <alangbaker-69826D.19571415122009(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> >
> > In article <7oq0dqF3rhrqrU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > > news:MPG.25914215c8243bfa9898aa(a)news.giganews.com...
> > > > In article <alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base
an
> > > opinion
> > > > > > on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Greg
> > > > >
> > > > > No, there isn't actually.
> > > > >
> > > > > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
> > > >
> > > > The court of public opinion is not based upon facts.
> > >
> > > Uh....uncle al, the kiddie's pal, consider this.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > What do you mean by that, Greg?
>
> What do you think he means?

Rowen and Martin. Look it up, uncle Al.

-Greg



From: dene on

"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:7osi6oF3rnhttU3(a)mid.individual.net...
>
> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-06C4E1.20013615122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > In article <7oq56iF3ot8rhU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> >> news:alangbaker-5886C2.22351714122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> >> > In article <7onf4oF3jmqihU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message
> >> >> news:MfednXcClrivHLvWnZ2dnUVZ_uZi4p2d(a)supernews.com...
> >> >> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/14/09 11:05 AM:
> >> >> > > On 14-Dec-2009, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >> More people should adopt that attitude, but they aren't smart
> >> >> > >> enough
> >> >> > >> to know what they don't know.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > opinions are not knowledge
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Opinions without knowledge are both utterly pointless and
> >> >> > excruciatingly common on Usenet.
> >> >>
> >> >> In the case of Tiger Woods, there is plenty of knowledge to base an
> >> >> opinion
> >> >> on.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Greg
> >> >
> >> > No, there isn't actually.
> >> >
> >> > What actual facts do you have, Greg. Go on: let's see 'em!
> >> >
> >> What exactly would constitute a fact to you anyway? So the parade of
> >> bimbos
> >> on the morning shows giving lurid details are not fact?
> >
> > It's a fact they're on the morning shows, but that doesn't make what
> > they are claiming fact.
> >
> >> What about the
> >> published text messages?
> >
> > What about 'em? They are some facts, and I've not denied there are some
> > facts out there. What I've said is that they are far from the whole
> > story of a man.
> >
> > I don't think "there is plenty of knowledge to base an opinion on".
> >
> >> What about the soon to be released pics?
> >
> > "soon to be released" is another way of saying "not yet facts".
> >
> Your analness is astounding.

There is only two logical conclusions. He's trolling or incredible stupid.

-Greg


From: Ken Meltzer on
On Dec 16, 12:12 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> "Ken Meltzer" <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2f446af1-521b-442e-ac63-7921045c02d1(a)g12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 16, 9:00 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:04:36 -0800 (PST), Ken Meltzer
>
> > <commsp...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > >If you use Firefox as your web browser, you can use an add-on called
> > >Greasemonkey that allows you to filter both individual posters and
> > >complete threads in Google Groups.
> > >Best,
> > >Ken
>
> > But then one couldn't boast about kill filing a person on one
> > computer, yet be able to read everything he posts on another. :-)
>
> > BK
>
> Always happy to annoy you from afar, Knit.
>
> Thanks for the tip, Ken.  I love FireFox.  I'll d/l greasemonkey today.
>
> -Greg

I think you'll like it, Greg. It's made navigating via Google much
more manageable.
Best,
Ken (still cleaning the mud off after nine in Atlanta today)
From: Carbon on
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:55:29 -0500, BAR wrote:
> In article <iMidnfZdUbiZ67XWnZ2dnUVZ_rZi4p2d(a)supernews.com>,
> ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says...
>> kenpitts wrote, On 12/15/09 10:34 PM:
>>
>>> Obama must be very evil because he is hitting a home run when it
>>> comes to bringing Republicans back to power.
>>
>> The jury is still out on that, but based on what Joe Lieberman did
>> this week, I think you very well may be right -- except for one
>> thing. He's not evil, he's just failing.
>
> Obama is evil. He hates people who succeed on their own merit,
> regardless of their skin color.

You're paranoid.