From: assimilate on

On 9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:

> > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close
> > > to being in his shoes.
> >
> > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
>
> Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased and
> covers only a very small slice of someone's life.

It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what he's
done to his family.

--
bill-o
From: Alan Baker on
In article <4b2083bd$0$14025$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
assimilate(a)borg.org wrote:

> On 9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close
> > > > to being in his shoes.
> > >
> > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
> >
> > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased and
> > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.
>
> It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what he's
> done to his family.

You don't even know precisely *what* he has done and you certainly don't
know how his family feels about it.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dsc-ky on
On Dec 10, 12:14 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> On  9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close
> > > > to being in his shoes.
>
> > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
>
> > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased and
> > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.

That small part is mostly all we have been talking about...

>
> It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what he's
> done to his family.
>
> --
> bill-o

Shhs... you aren't allowed an opinion without first getting Baker's
approval... :)
From: Alan Baker on
In article
<41a11d73-2d73-4e05-bfdd-840a50b8284c(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:

> On Dec 10, 12:14�am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> > On �9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close
> > > > > to being in his shoes.
> >
> > > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
> >
> > > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> > > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased and
> > > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.
>
> That small part is mostly all we have been talking about...

But you've been using it to make statements about his whole life...

>
> >
> > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what he's
> > done to his family.
> >
> > --
> > bill-o
>
> Shhs... you aren't allowed an opinion without first getting Baker's
> approval... :)

LOL

Not the least in the world. I wonder why it is that so many who want to
spout off suddenly think that anyone else discussing the merits of what
they say is somehow trying to prevent them from saying it?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dsc-ky on
On Dec 10, 2:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <41a11d73-2d73-4e05-bfdd-840a50b82...(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 12:14 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> > > On  9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been close
> > > > > > to being in his shoes.
>
> > > > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
>
> > > > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> > > > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased and
> > > > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.
>
> > That small part is mostly all we have been talking about...
>
> But you've been using it to make statements about his whole life...
>

I have? I thought I was talking mostly about him being a punk, liar,
adulterer, etc. Is that his whole life? Things that pretty well relate
directly to this scandal.

>
>
> > > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what he's
> > > done to his family.
>
> > > --
> > > bill-o
>
> > Shhs... you aren't allowed an opinion without first getting Baker's
> > approval... :)
>
> LOL
>
> Not the least in the world. I wonder why it is that so many who want to
> spout off suddenly think that anyone else discussing the merits of what
> they say is somehow trying to prevent them from saying it?

Because your feathers get really ruffled anytime anyone says anything
negative about Tiger... whether is just an opinion, verifiable fact or
whatever. :):):)