Was Pitts right?
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 18 Dec 2009 09:52 On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:11:22 -0500, BAR wrote: > In article <DICdnX-RsNqpjbbWnZ2dnUVZ_s5i4p2d(a)supernews.com>, > ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says... >> assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/17/09 10:03 PM: >>> On 17-Dec-2009, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote: >>> >>>> Doesn't have to be a lie to be under false pretenses. >>> >>> yes because it implies deception, >> >> Yes, but it doesn't make clear who deceived. >> >> It's moot anyway, because the administration lied repeatedly. It's in >> the history books now. > > Who wrote the history books? A bit of history. Bert here believes that only "winners" write history and therefore anything winners say automatically becomes the truth, apparently because they control the means of history book production.
From: dsc-ky on 18 Dec 2009 09:56 On Dec 18, 8:06 am, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <z_-dne1r6rSBtrbWnZ2dnUVZ_rpi4...(a)supernews.com>, > ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says... > > > > > David Laville wrote, On 12/18/09 12:32 AM: > > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:52:30 -0600, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> > > > wrote: > > > >> Sorry, but it's factual. Poorer people pay a far greater > > >> percentage of their income in those taxes and fees than > > >> do the wealthy. Period. > > > > Do you even know what a progressive tax is? > > > Careful. I have a history of embarrassing people on this > > topic. This is not the liberal you want to try that tactic > > with. > > How much money do you earn Chris? If it is more that that which provides > you a basic subsistence then you are one of those you hate or envy. > > Do you have a savings account? If yes, why are you hoarding money? > > Do you have a retirement account? If yes, why are you hoarding money? I claim it isn't hoarded... it's there available for someone to borrow and put to use... It's available... not hoarded.
From: dsc-ky on 18 Dec 2009 09:59 On Dec 18, 9:18 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote: > BAR wrote, On 12/18/09 7:06 AM: > > > > > > > In article <z_-dne1r6rSBtrbWnZ2dnUVZ_rpi4...(a)supernews.com>, > > ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says... > >> David Laville wrote, On 12/18/09 12:32 AM: > >>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:52:30 -0600, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> > >>> wrote: > > >>>> Sorry, but it's factual. Poorer people pay a far greater > >>>> percentage of their income in those taxes and fees than > >>>> do the wealthy. Period. > >>> Do you even know what a progressive tax is? > >> Careful. I have a history of embarrassing people on this > >> topic. This is not the liberal you want to try that tactic > >> with. > > > How much money do you earn Chris? If it is more that that which provides > > you a basic subsistence then you are one of those you hate or envy. > > > Do you have a savings account? If yes, why are you hoarding money? > > > Do you have a retirement account? If yes, why are you hoarding money? > > I don't make nearly enough to be part of this discussion, > and neither do you. > > If you really think this is about savings, you probably > should mark the thread as read and move along without > comment. > > cb- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - So if hoarded money isn't saved/invested/etc... then where is it?
From: Moderate on 18 Dec 2009 10:13 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4b2b9729$0$4948$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:11:22 -0500, BAR wrote: >> In article <DICdnX-RsNqpjbbWnZ2dnUVZ_s5i4p2d(a)supernews.com>, >> ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc says... >>> assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/17/09 10:03 PM: >>>> On 17-Dec-2009, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Doesn't have to be a lie to be under false pretenses. >>>> >>>> yes because it implies deception, >>> >>> Yes, but it doesn't make clear who deceived. >>> >>> It's moot anyway, because the administration lied repeatedly. It's in >>> the history books now. >> >> Who wrote the history books? > > A bit of history. Bert here believes that only "winners" write history > and therefore anything winners say automatically becomes the truth, > apparently because they control the means of history book production. The Democrats won. They haven't come up with anything. Neither did the four previous Congressional investigations.
From: Moderate on 18 Dec 2009 10:16
"Chris Bellomy" <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote in message news:DICdnX6RsNoYjbbWnZ2dnUVZ_s5i4p2d(a)supernews.com... > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote, On 12/17/09 10:09 PM: >> On 17-Dec-2009, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote: >> >>> There has been considerable reporting about the stovepiping >>> of intel through Cheney's office. I want to be precise about >>> this, though: *Cheney's* office. >> >>> But the links between Cheney and the doctored intel are >>> documented and proved. >> >> where? > > talkingpointsmemo.com did quite a bit of the investigative > reporting, which probably explains why you never read it. > Nevertheless, if you want to get down to the details, those > are the archives to read. The reporting was quite thorough > and specific. > > cb I read the reports of the four Congressional investigations. It was documented that the intel was not doctored by the Bush Administration. |