From: dsc-ky on
On Dec 10, 8:51 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> In article
> <8183adb0-21e5-48f1-8240-b1bc0379c...(a)m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2:11 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <41a11d73-2d73-4e05-bfdd-840a50b82...(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >  dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 10, 12:14 am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> > > > > On  9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never been
> > > > > > > > close
> > > > > > > > to being in his shoes.
>
> > > > > > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
>
> > > > > > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions that
> > > > > > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is biased
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.
>
> > > > That small part is mostly all we have been talking about...
>
> > > But you've been using it to make statements about his whole life...
>
> > I have? I thought I was talking mostly about him being a punk, liar,
> > adulterer, etc. Is that his whole life? Things that pretty well relate
> > directly to this scandal.
>
> Him "being a punk" is about his whole life?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what
> > > > > he's
> > > > > done to his family.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > bill-o
>
> > > > Shhs... you aren't allowed an opinion without first getting Baker's
> > > > approval... :)
>
> > > LOL
>
> > > Not the least in the world. I wonder why it is that so many who want to
> > > spout off suddenly think that anyone else discussing the merits of what
> > > they say is somehow trying to prevent them from saying it?
>
> > Because your feathers get really ruffled anytime anyone says anything
> > negative about Tiger... whether is just an opinion, verifiable fact or
> > whatever. :):):)
>
> Nope. That's not it at all. Apparently, you don't know me very well,
> either.
>
> --
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>

But I said that long before any of this happened... so it is not in
any way related to this particular incident alone.
From: bknight on
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:12:38 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
<Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:

>On Dec 10, 9:03�pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0800 (PST), dsc-ky
>>
>> <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
>> >I don't mind playing with him. But I'll tire of it after a while and
>> >move on... :)
>>
>> Of all the lame, trite, phrases you've used this is the worst. �When
>> someone says this its almost always the other way around.
>>
>> You aren't playing with anyone.
>>
>> BK
>
>Is that your opinion or some indisputable fact?

Its just true.

BK
From: MNMikeW on

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-B57F39.23332910122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> In article <4b21d52e$0$17352$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
> assimilate(a)borg.org wrote:
>
>> On 10-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what
>> > > he's
>> > > done to his family.
>> >
>> > You don't even know precisely *what* he has done and you certainly
>> > don't
>> > know how his family feels about it.
>>
>> this is quite possibly the silliest thing you've ever posted.
>
> How so?
>
> The following are all yes or no questions, Bill:
>
> Do you know what actually happened (versus what a lot of people with
> their own agendas have said happened)?
>
> Do you know what his family actually feels about all of this?
>
> I dare you to answer those questions.
>
I dare you, LOL!


From: Alan Baker on
In article
<6f6d8026-00da-49ba-a5a4-6cf80cff3444(a)v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
dsc-ky <Dudley.Cornman(a)eku.edu> wrote:

> On Dec 10, 8:51�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <8183adb0-21e5-48f1-8240-b1bc0379c...(a)m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > > On Dec 10, 2:11�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <41a11d73-2d73-4e05-bfdd-840a50b82...(a)e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > �dsc-ky <Dudley.Corn...(a)eku.edu> wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 10, 12:14�am, assimil...(a)borg.org wrote:
> > > > > > On �9-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > You don't know what kind of man he is, because you've never
> > > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > close
> > > > > > > > > to being in his shoes.
> >
> > > > > > > > Is a man to be judged by his actions or not?
> >
> > > > > > > Absolutely, but a man should be judged on more than the actions
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > happen to make it onto television. The view of television is
> > > > > > > biased
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > covers only a very small slice of someone's life.
> >
> > > > > That small part is mostly all we have been talking about...
> >
> > > > But you've been using it to make statements about his whole life...
> >
> > > I have? I thought I was talking mostly about him being a punk, liar,
> > > adulterer, etc. Is that his whole life? Things that pretty well relate
> > > directly to this scandal.
> >
> > Him "being a punk" is about his whole life?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > he's
> > > > > > done to his family.
> >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > bill-o
> >
> > > > > Shhs... you aren't allowed an opinion without first getting Baker's
> > > > > approval... :)
> >
> > > > LOL
> >
> > > > Not the least in the world. I wonder why it is that so many who want to
> > > > spout off suddenly think that anyone else discussing the merits of what
> > > > they say is somehow trying to prevent them from saying it?
> >
> > > Because your feathers get really ruffled anytime anyone says anything
> > > negative about Tiger... whether is just an opinion, verifiable fact or
> > > whatever. :):):)
> >
> > Nope. That's not it at all. Apparently, you don't know me very well,
> > either.
> >
> > --
> > Alan Baker
> > Vancouver, British Columbia
> > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
>
> But I said that long before any of this happened... so it is not in
> any way related to this particular incident alone.

And you didn't know enough then to say it...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <7of4h0F3nrbemU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-B57F39.23332910122009(a)news.shawcable.com...
> > In article <4b21d52e$0$17352$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
> > assimilate(a)borg.org wrote:
> >
> >> On 10-Dec-2009, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > > It seems to me that there is very little that could make up for what
> >> > > he's
> >> > > done to his family.
> >> >
> >> > You don't even know precisely *what* he has done and you certainly
> >> > don't
> >> > know how his family feels about it.
> >>
> >> this is quite possibly the silliest thing you've ever posted.
> >
> > How so?
> >
> > The following are all yes or no questions, Bill:
> >
> > Do you know what actually happened (versus what a lot of people with
> > their own agendas have said happened)?
> >
> > Do you know what his family actually feels about all of this?
> >
> > I dare you to answer those questions.
> >
> I dare you, LOL!

Yup. Does English confuse you so much?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>