From: Miss Anne Thrope on 27 Feb 2007 10:17 Isn't it ironic that there isn't enough bandwidth in RSG to cover all the things that are wrong with RSG? It's irony on a base level, but it's still funny.
From: Chris Bellomy on 27 Feb 2007 16:46 Not enough hot chyx. Next question? -- Chris Bellomy C-List Charter Member http://clist.org/
From: Bobby Knight on 28 Feb 2007 16:03 On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:40:04 -0500, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusiness(a)all.com> wrote: <clip> >If indeed you're right about Bobby's MO here (and I take some exception with >it), there's more similarity between the two of you than you're willing to >acknowledge. <clip> Thanks for the "if" and taking some exception Randy. :-) >Why don't you let those other people stand up and fend for themselves? Or >are you meaning to imply by defending them that you don't think they're >intellectually capable of doing so? > >We already know you're not. > >Randy -- ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
From: Dene on 28 Feb 2007 16:31 On Feb 28, 12:40 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...(a)all.com> wrote: > Why don't you let those other people stand up and fend for themselves? Or > are you meaning to imply by defending them that you don't think they're > intellectually capable of doing so? > And why don't you let BK stand up and fend for himself. Don't you think he is intellectually capable of doing so? Hmmmm...... -Greg
From: Steve S on 28 Feb 2007 20:38
"Dene" <gdstrue(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:1172698259.761571.4180(a)k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 28, 12:40 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...(a)all.com> wrote: > >> Why don't you let those other people stand up and fend for themselves? >> Or >> are you meaning to imply by defending them that you don't think they're >> intellectually capable of doing so? >> > > And why don't you let BK stand up and fend for himself. Don't you > think he is intellectually capable of doing so? > > Hmmmm...... > > -Greg > > > Nice retort, Hard to argue with logic. |