What's wrong with RSG?
in [Golf]
|
From: Howard Brazee on 25 Feb 2007 11:15 On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:26:09 -0700, "glfnaz" <glfnaz(a)qwesttrash.com> wrote: >Pflum did what? >I don't think John ever attacked anybody here. Some of us are dead to him though.
From: ""R&B"" on 25 Feb 2007 11:41 "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message news:ora3u2lmlhtq2rcg36e04373vq8ei3mhnp(a)4ax.com... > On 25 Feb 2007 05:05:37 -0800, bajacornman(a)adelphia.net wrote: > >>Being all test based is one of it's bigest cancers... >>everything today is visual... and text based doesn't cut it anymore. > > Yep. It's also its biggest strengths. GUI is text base with more > work, and can you imagine a camera based replacement? Requiring web cams for post would probably cut down on the number of flame wars. Randy
From: John van der Pflum on 25 Feb 2007 13:06 On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:15:51 GMT, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:26:09 -0700, "glfnaz" <glfnaz(a)qwesttrash.com> >wrote: > >>Pflum did what? >>I don't think John ever attacked anybody here. > >Some of us are dead to him though. Great! Now ghosts are participating in this thread!!!! Argh. -- jvdp Start clearing your calendars http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Dene on 25 Feb 2007 13:17 On Feb 24, 11:22 pm, "newellsatwsu" <newellat...(a)adelphia.net> wrote: > On Feb 24, 8:15 pm, "Dene" <gdst...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > That's another lie. We had no plans to attend. We didn't attend the > > prior year. It simply wasn't as much fun as the earlier events, for > > reasons I've stated before. > > Which is exactly why I received a Yes, No, Yes, No series of > committments from Greg in terms of his attendance for RSGNW 05 in the > span of about 3-4 weeks prior. In fact, I had to find a last minute > replacement to fill their spots that year. Either he was lying to me > or lying to RSG with the above post about his "no plans to attend". > You decide. It's simple..... your event was not worth the sacrifice. -Greg
From: Robert Hamilton on 25 Feb 2007 14:12
\"R&B\" wrote: > > What you're really referring to is a war that was engaged between two > factions of RSG regulars. On one side was a small group that included you, > Dene, Eric, George and maybe one or two others. On the other side was a > group of about ten people who subscribe to a private e-mail list generally > referred to as the c-list (facetiously named "c" for "clique," a term often > used to describe us by that person we chose to ignore and who, thankfully, > finally left RSG alone after he was exposed as the crossdressing freak that > he was). There is only one problem here. No one else formed any sort of idiot conspiracy to gang up on the actions of other people. What I saw was a group of paranoid schizophrenics that attacked people like me and Eric while we defended ourselves. A good case in point is the so called RSG events. If Eric or I announced such an event, the RSG nutcases were all over it with literally hundreds of posts trashing them. No such thing from me or Eric for things like RSG-NW or RSG-Wisc, for example. Again, I just call it as I see it though, and I know that I couldn't forumlate the desire to care what people like Newell and Dalecki do, let alone launch a prolonged "offensive" against their activites. While I don't care, all I really have to offer to them is my best wishes and the only action I will take is to stay as far away from such as they as possible. |