From: William Clark on
In article <h5qi16p8fvbogk7c8m4in9es5ulsngv7fu(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:18:11 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
> >news:hvanmb$stm$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> >>
> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:wclark2-044C97.10192716062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >>> In article <hv8smi$dbh$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> >>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
> >The really funny thing about clark is that he has all along thought, still
> >thinks, and will always think that he won this little exchange.
> >
> True, but even funnier is that Moderate thinks and will always think,
> that he won it. :-)
>
> The bet was never made.
>
> BK

Because he was too chicken to take it. As he was with the similar
challenge on publications.

But I am sure his soul mates will jump to his aid. God knows, he needs
all the help he can get.
From: William Clark on
In article <_TdSn.44995$rU6.1232(a)newsfe10.iad>,
"Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:h5qi16p8fvbogk7c8m4in9es5ulsngv7fu(a)4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:18:11 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> > <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:hvanmb$stm$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> >>>
> >>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:wclark2-044C97.10192716062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >>>> In article <hv8smi$dbh$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> >>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>The really funny thing about clark is that he has all along thought, still
> >>thinks, and will always think that he won this little exchange.
> >>
> > True, but even funnier is that Moderate thinks and will always think,
> > that he won it. :-)
> >
> > The bet was never made.
>
> True. What is that saying about a battle between unarmed opponents?

I was thinking that challenging Immoderate was more along the lines of
fighting the Italian army.
From: Moderate on
William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
> In article
> <889267809298427428.287228nospam-nomail.comu(a)news.suddenlink.net>,
> Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote:
>
>> "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hvanmb$stm$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:wclark2-044C97.10192716062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>>>>> In article <hv8smi$dbh$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
>>>>> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:wclark2-392E54.17531514062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> <813918425298243414.601006nospam-nomail.comu(a)news.suddenlink.net>,
>>>>>>> Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <hv5u4m$qio$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, so do you want to take this bet? AAMOF I have posted about
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Memorial, but no one pays any attention because loons like you
> > > > > > > > >
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> rather find absurd pretexts to take shots at Obama instead.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, are you going to take this bet, and how many PGA Tour
> > > > > > > > > events
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> you been to?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Before I make a bet we have to agree on the proof that you have
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> 22 PGA events.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, where does 22 suddenly come from? Moving the goal posts in
>>>>>>> late
>>>>>>> panic, are we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me remind you of your statement above "I doubt you have ever
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> a PGA event". I don't see 22 anywhere in there. Still, par for
> > > > > > > the
>>>>>>> course for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You avoided the question of proof. You said you have been to 22
>>>>>> events.
>>>>>
>>>>> No I did not (although I have). Show me where I ever claimed to
> > > > > have
>>>>> been to 22. That is your invention.
>>>>
>>>> Here is what you said...
>>>>
>>>> "In addition to twenty-plus Memorials, I will also raise you one
>>>> Ryder
>>>> Cup and one Solheim Cup, and shortly one President's Cup.
>>>>
>>>> What have you got?"
>>>>
>>>> 20 plus Memorials + one Ryder Cup is at least 22 PGA events.
>>>
>>>
>>> The really funny thing about clark is that he has all along thought,
>>> still
>>> thinks, and will always think that he won this little exchange.
>>
>> Very funny indeed :-)
>>
>> I guess you have to be a PHD to admit you can't win after you offer a
>> bet. Real bright this Clark fellow.
>
> Look, all this bluff and bluster doesn't cover up the fact that you
> are
> skunked here, but just not man enough to admit it.
>
> If you think otherwise, then please give us all the benefit of your
> "reasoning". This should be funny.
>
> PS: As a reminder, given that you seem to have convenient and
> selective
> amnesia, remember you said "I doubt you have ever been to
> a PGA event".

The bet you offered was that you had been to at least 22. Then you admit
you can't prove it. Very funny, even for a PHD.
From: bknight on
On 17 Jun 2010 03:21:34 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote:


>The bet you offered was that you had been to at least 22. Then you admit
>you can't prove it. Very funny, even for a PHD.

That would be PhD.

BK
From: dene on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:675j16dlj278msd5q5668ukq6q50b96i7u(a)4ax.com...
> On 17 Jun 2010 03:21:34 GMT, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote:
>
>
> >The bet you offered was that you had been to at least 22. Then you admit
> >you can't prove it. Very funny, even for a PHD.
>
> That would be PhD.
>
> BK

PHD is more apropos in Clark's case.
Piled Higher and Deeper.

-Greg