health care
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 24 Feb 2010 19:03 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:34:19 +0000, assimilate wrote: > On 23-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> But I guess people have learned to be afraid. > > no one learns to be afraid, you do however learn what to be afraid of. Oh god.
From: Carbon on 24 Feb 2010 19:05 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:37:09 +0000, assimilate wrote: > On 22-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >>>> Given a choice between being "forced" to pay $50, or having the >>>> freedom to choose between $75 and $80, which would you take? >>> >>> I would want the choice because a $45 choice may come along in a >>> dynamic market. >> >> I enjoyed the inclusion of the word "may". > > you rail against "blind certainty" then laugh at "may." You can't have > your cake and eat it too. I read it as an admission that your "free market" healthcare is in fact much more expensive than universal healthcare. It's a small step, but that's ok.
From: Carbon on 24 Feb 2010 19:09 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:47:32 -0800, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4b833e5b$0$5102$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> Other than things like out and about rhyming with boot, Canada is >> very very similar to the US in diet, in culture, standard of living, >> etc. Yet Canadians have an average life expectancy several years >> greater than Americans. What could possibly account for this >> startling difference? > > We have more smelly people. There may well be a larger percentage of the population in abject poverty. Maybe Florida is special, I don't know. But once you get away from the touristy areas it can be a pretty sad place. I was very surprised once I got here.
From: Carbon on 24 Feb 2010 19:12 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:39:34 +0000, assimilate wrote: > On 22-Feb-2010, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>> perhaps, but the unemployment of the young due to the cost of hiring >>> is a hard, verifyable fact. >> >> But much of your criticism centers on the alleged difficulty in firing >> people. It has nothing to do with universal healthcare. > > did you see only half my reasoning, the half that doesn't agree with > your ideology? You tried to support your argument with two unsubstantiated claims, one of which was completely irrelevant. What do you expect?
From: BAR on 24 Feb 2010 19:16
In article <clark-26AD1C.09041624022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > In article <MPG.25eee5eba382fbec989c4d(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <clark-AE7862.09022523022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > Not much market? Are you serious? Have you ever set foot in a major > > > > city? Have you ever used public transportation in NY or DC or > > > > Chicago? > > > > > > 30,000 people commute into Columbus every day down SR 315. I am one of > > > them. Every car on the road has but one occupant, and there is no public > > > transport alternative. That is just stupid. > > > > What are you doing about it other than making statements? Have you > > gotten a group of people together to commit to purchasing bus passes for > > 10 years to fund the bus route? > > > > Talk is easy, action is hard. We know what you do best. > > http://tiny.cc/pQdJ9 Not surprisingly I saw no references to William Clark or any other forms of your name. As usual your efforts go no further than providing a URL to someone else's work. |