health care
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 25 Feb 2010 17:19 In article <clark-5CC1DE.09503025022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > > > Talk is easy, action is hard. We know what you do best. > > > > > > > > > > http://tiny.cc/pQdJ9 > > > > > > > > Not surprisingly I saw no references to William Clark or any other forms > > > > of your name. > > > > > > > > As usual your efforts go no further than providing a URL to someone > > > > else's work. > > > > > > I do my work behind the scenes. > > > > > > Providing a URL is all the effort your nonsense merits. Sorry. > > > > Does taking credit for the work of others fall under unethical conduct > > or is it just a lie? > > You understand as little about the rules of attribution as you do about > AGW or anything else. Just as I thought. Your total involvement is cutting and pasting a URL.
From: BAR on 25 Feb 2010 17:21 In article <clark-B0A746.09511025022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > Hint: if you don't make them, no one will embarrass you in public. > > > > > > > > > > > > Like posting to USENET at the turn from your iPhone? > > > > > > > > > > Like lying about the "proof" that Dino "provided" of his materials > > > > > science "publications"? > > > > > > > > All I did was make reference to terms. You as usual assumed facts not in > > > > evidence. > > > > > > No, you claimed he had provided you with "proof", when he had not. Don't > > > try to change the script after the fact. > > > > Billy, you are lying. I never said he had provided me with proof. Check > > the record and show me the posting. > > Ah, back to the old "you find the cite" tactic. It had to come out > sooner or later. You are too funny, I suppose you want me to pass judgment on myself and escort myself to jail too. Your allegation, you provide the evidence.
From: William Clark on 25 Feb 2010 17:32 In article <MPG.25f0c17ced1b8caa989c62(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-5CC1DE.09503025022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Talk is easy, action is hard. We know what you do best. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tiny.cc/pQdJ9 > > > > > > > > > > Not surprisingly I saw no references to William Clark or any other > > > > > forms > > > > > of your name. > > > > > > > > > > As usual your efforts go no further than providing a URL to someone > > > > > else's work. > > > > > > > > I do my work behind the scenes. > > > > > > > > Providing a URL is all the effort your nonsense merits. Sorry. > > > > > > Does taking credit for the work of others fall under unethical conduct > > > or is it just a lie? > > > > You understand as little about the rules of attribution as you do about > > AGW or anything else. > > Just as I thought. Your total involvement is cutting and pasting a URL. As I said, it is all your contribution warranted. Provide some content and you'll get a considered response.
From: William Clark on 25 Feb 2010 17:33 In article <MPG.25f0c2002c29cf9e989c63(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-B0A746.09511025022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > Hint: if you don't make them, no one will embarrass you in > > > > > > > > public. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like posting to USENET at the turn from your iPhone? > > > > > > > > > > > > Like lying about the "proof" that Dino "provided" of his materials > > > > > > science "publications"? > > > > > > > > > > All I did was make reference to terms. You as usual assumed facts not > > > > > in > > > > > evidence. > > > > > > > > No, you claimed he had provided you with "proof", when he had not. > > > > Don't > > > > try to change the script after the fact. > > > > > > Billy, you are lying. I never said he had provided me with proof. Check > > > the record and show me the posting. > > > > Ah, back to the old "you find the cite" tactic. It had to come out > > sooner or later. > > You are too funny, I suppose you want me to pass judgment on myself and > escort myself to jail too. > > Your allegation, you provide the evidence. No, you claimed he provided "proof", you back it up.
From: BAR on 25 Feb 2010 17:37
In article <clark-E95760.17321925022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > In article <MPG.25f0c17ced1b8caa989c62(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <clark-5CC1DE.09503025022010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Talk is easy, action is hard. We know what you do best. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tiny.cc/pQdJ9 > > > > > > > > > > > > Not surprisingly I saw no references to William Clark or any other > > > > > > forms > > > > > > of your name. > > > > > > > > > > > > As usual your efforts go no further than providing a URL to someone > > > > > > else's work. > > > > > > > > > > I do my work behind the scenes. > > > > > > > > > > Providing a URL is all the effort your nonsense merits. Sorry. > > > > > > > > Does taking credit for the work of others fall under unethical conduct > > > > or is it just a lie? > > > > > > You understand as little about the rules of attribution as you do about > > > AGW or anything else. > > > > Just as I thought. Your total involvement is cutting and pasting a URL. > > As I said, it is all your contribution warranted. Provide some content > and you'll get a considered response. Sorry, I am not interested in begging you for information. |