health care
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 27 Feb 2010 18:53 In article <79d69971-fbb4-48f5-a641-a6de7404486d@ 19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > Insurance cos. based in states with weak insurance regs. can and do > raise rates w/impunity. And nobody, repeat NOBODY, has proposed "govt. > control of health care." You would easily be the first lamb led to the slaughter.
From: BAR on 27 Feb 2010 18:55 In article <t08jo51rtumq2ofrboh92es3sbj9e7f2gq(a)4ax.com>, howard(a)brazee.net says... > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:09:27 -0500, William Clark > <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > >Well, I tend to believe what I read. > > Kind of dangerous. What is unwritten or unspoken is the most dangerous.
From: Jack Hollis on 27 Feb 2010 20:01 On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:03:58 -0800 (PST), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Insurance cos. based in states with weak insurance regs. can and do >raise rates w/impunity. And nobody, repeat NOBODY, has proposed "govt. >control of health care." Health insurance is already one of the most regulated businesses in the US. What the US needs is less government interference with the free market, not more.
From: John B. on 27 Feb 2010 21:37 On Feb 27, 8:01 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:03:58 -0800 (PST), "John B." > > <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Insurance cos. based in states with weak insurance regs. can and do > >raise rates w/impunity. And nobody, repeat NOBODY, has proposed "govt. > >control of health care." > > Health insurance is already one of the most regulated businesses in > the US. What the US needs is less government interference with the > free market, not more. Health insurance is heavily regulated in some states and lightly regulated in others. What the industry needs is a single regulatory regime for all companies. And that, by the way, is exactly what the insurance industry wants.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 28 Feb 2010 11:33
On Feb 27, 2:03 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > And nobody, repeat NOBODY, has proposed "govt. > control of health care." That's the spin now. If it's true, then why do they want to spend a trillion dollars of working people's money? |