From: Carbon on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:40:27 -0800, John B. wrote:
> On Mar 3, 12:07 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:55:08 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b8dbd26$0$4858$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:42:13 -0800, John B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In the UK, you may wait for months for elective surgery. If you
>>>>> need urgent care, you get it right away.
>>>>
>>>> Same with Canada.
>>>
>>> Nice system.  A person is in pain, needing a hip or knee
>>> replacement, waits months for the surgery.  In the meantime, just
>>> sock them full of vicodin and watch tv..
>>>
>>> I may pay more but it's worth it.
>>
>> It really isn't. Canada provides healthcare to all its citizens at
>> 2/3 the cost of the US system. The system obviously works better,
>> because your CIA world fact book says the average life expectancy in
>> Canada is more than three years greater than in the US. Similar
>> lifestyle and culture. Hmm, I wonder what could account for this
>> amazing difference...
>
> They're not all murdering eachother with handguns. You can't get one
> in Canada.

I imagine the murder rate is lower there, but not by enough to knock
three+ years off the average life expectancy stats.
From: Carbon on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:25:27 -0800, dene wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b8dee9d$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:55:08 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b8dbd26$0$4858$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:42:13 -0800, John B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In the UK, you may wait for months for elective surgery. If you
>>>>> need urgent care, you get it right away.
>>>>
>>>> Same with Canada.
>>>
>>> Nice system. A person is in pain, needing a hip or knee
>>> replacement, waits months for the surgery. In the meantime, just
>>> sock them full of vicodin and watch tv..
>>>
>>> I may pay more but it's worth it.
>>
>> It really isn't. Canada provides healthcare to all its citizens at
>> 2/3 the cost of the US system. The system obviously works better,
>> because your CIA world fact book says the average life expectancy in
>> Canada is more than three years greater than in the US. Similar
>> lifestyle and culture. Hmm, I wonder what could account for this
>> amazing difference...
>
> We've covered this. The US has a more diverse society than Canada.
> The life expectancy is related to people's personal choices (obesity)
> than it is with health care.

Do you really think people suddenly become less fat on the other side of
the border?
From: Carbon on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:43:18 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b8deefe$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:42:10 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b8dc0a8$0$4874$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>
>>>> Greg, us responsible, premium paying people are the ones getting
>>>> fucked.
>>>
>>> Yes....by the irresponsible and illegal uninusred.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be nifty-keen if the deadbeats got hit with a sales tax
>> every time they bought smokes and brewskis?
>
> They already do.

For healthcare?
From: Carbon on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:51:56 -0800, dene wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b8deefe$0$4891$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:42:10 -0800, dene wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b8dc0a8$0$4874$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>
>>>> Greg, us responsible, premium paying people are the ones getting
>>>> fucked.
>>>
>>> Yes....by the irresponsible and illegal uninusred.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be nifty-keen if the deadbeats got hit with a sales tax
>> every time they bought smokes and brewskis?
>
> For many, it's the only tax they pay.

Exactly.
From: Carbon on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:42:39 -0600, MNMikeW wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b8dc0a8$0$4874$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:05:14 -0800, dene wrote:
>>>> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:832ab3b9-3f3e-4d77-8744-
>>>> a04857db0098(a)u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On Mar 2, 1:47 am,
>>>> "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4b8c6a22$0$5085$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:37:36 +0000, assimilate wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1-Mar-2010, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to the resident free market market ideologues, your
>>>>>>>> situation problem is your fault due to choices you must have
>>>>>>>> made in your life. For example, getting a medical condition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you so don't understand, choices combine with the random nature
>>>>>>> of the world to produce consequences. You can't eliminate the
>>>>>>> luck of the draw, you can choose to deal with it, but many here
>>>>>>> would rather run to the nanny state.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't seem to have thought this "random nature of the world"
>>>>>> justification through very well. It would seem to permit every
>>>>>> crime ever conceived of by man. Not to mention that there is
>>>>>> absolutely nothing random about getting fucked by your health
>>>>>> insurance provider.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever occured to you that there are key portions of the Senate and
>>>>> House bill that are screwing the health insurance companies?
>>>>>
>>>>> But what does that matter. It's not your money, is it?
>>>>
>>>> Aw, poor health insurance companies. I feel terrible for them.
>>>
>>> Yeah....screw them and the millions of responsible, premium paying
>>> people they serve. Where did you acquire this sense of entitlement,
>>> John?
>>
>> Greg, us responsible, premium paying people are the ones getting
>> fucked.
>
> And you will continue to get fucked under Obamacare.

So you keep saying. You don't know that for a fact, though.