From: BAR on 4 Mar 2010 07:49 In article <4b8f0c98$0$4975$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> > >> So say you lose your job and can't find another, your wife leaves > >> you, your dog dies, etc. Would you still have the same charming > >> fuckya philosophy of life if you were one of the less fortunate? > > > > Do you know what integrity and principles are, some of us have them. > > > > It was late October 1980. My boss at the USDA said that if you wanted > > to keep your job you know who to vote for for president. I pulled the > > lever for Ronald Wilson Reagan. I voted for the guy who said that he > > was going to reduce the federal workforce. > > > > I take responsibility for the choices and decisions I make in my life. > > I don't complain about the curves that life has thrown at me, I look > > them in the eye and deal with them and get on with my life. > > > > To answer your question, I will never be "less fortunate" because I > > will pick myself up and move on with my life. > > So you believe your fuckya philosophy is A-OK because you think it will > never apply to you. How very noble. It must really burn you up that so > many poor people (e.g. "thieves") get free healthcare. Forget Obama. > Here's the Bert Robbins healthcare plan. Install bouncers at every > hospital and run the credit of everyone who walks in the door, no > exceptions. It's not like they have any choice, so make the sick pay in > advance. Anyone who turns out to be sicker than they have money to pay > for shall be dragged out back and shot. I believe in personal responsibility. Why do you want to make everyone a ward of the state?
From: William Clark on 4 Mar 2010 08:14 In article <3c72ff98-a915-458a-87da-9289e7108103(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 3, 5:07�pm, Dinosaur Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Mar 3, 12:22�pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "William Clark" <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message > > > > >news:clark-8D24D2.09530403032010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > > In article <MPG.25f8312054bcd8d6989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <clark-6883CE.08091703032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > Do you know how much of your medical expenses car insurance will > > > cover? > > > > > > > > Thank you. But, for the benefit of the hard of thinking, let's > > > call it > > > > > > > > getting hit by falling masonry while walking in the street. > > > > > > > > > > There. Got it now? > > > > > > > > > Fine. �If there is no liability insurance to cover the accident > > > first, > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > one's health insurance will take over. > > > > > > > > > If you don't have it, get it. > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > Provided you can afford it. > > > > > > > Provided they are willing to give up unnecessary luxuries. > > > > > > Indeed, I go down to the east side of Columbus and work with single > > > > parent families whose homes are loaded with "unnecessary luxuries", like > > > > Ramen Noodles and such. > > > > > > You're a bigoted idiot. > > > > > If true, they are on medicaid, aren't they? �They are also receiving food > > > stamps and housing allowances. �So why are they *choosing* to eat Ramen > > > Noodles? > > > > > Laziness?? > > > > > -Greg > > > > You need to follow some food stamp users into the parking lot. Many of > > them drive new, (current model year) model vehicles. Not all do, mind > > you, but many. People who can pay for their insurance will take the > > free if they can get it, regardless.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Do you have some knowledge or experience to back this up? When I was > in college in Boston, I worked in a grocery store in a poor > neighborhood where lots of people were on food stamps. Not a single > one of them drove a new car or had any other luxury items. Urban legend. This is the stuff of Fox News.
From: William Clark on 4 Mar 2010 08:15 In article <3muto5lb75n2e92bbanqujlhsu9pgs651r(a)4ax.com>, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: > On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:51:58 -0500, William Clark > <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > > >You have, and it is still total and absolute BS. The 49 countries with > >life expectancies longer than the US represent all parts of the genetic > >tree. Which ethnic component of the US population is responsible for > >pulling its figures down? > > > >Think carefully before you answer. > > Old people? Indeed, I was thinking of the dead ones ;-)
From: bknight on 4 Mar 2010 08:59 On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:32:28 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:2pmso5t2ugjva97187n30pleot7aqdbt07(a)4ax.com... >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:56:03 -0800, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >news:vckro55ujverpfu4mf9lgf9klr8nc9r687(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:40:50 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >Businessmen are smarter than politicians. >> >> >> >> George Bush was a businessman. >> >> >> >> QED >> >> >> >> BK >> > >> >And the Democrats lost to him....twice. >> >> >> What does that have to do with Hollis' statement and my response? >> Nothing, GB was dumb as a businessman and a politician. >> >> BK > >It's hard for me to defend the worst president since Carter....but I will >never agree with you or anybody in saying he is a dumb man. > >-Greg > If you ever met him face-to-face you'd see. BK
From: Jack Hollis on 4 Mar 2010 11:26
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:10:55 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:47:48 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:31:31 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >> >>>He's traded on the >>>Bush name frome day one. >> >>If you think that anyone other than W was in charge, you're clueless. >>And he wasn't the first president who came from a rich family. Do you >>think that people from rich families shouldn't be president. If that >>were true then the US would have to do without FDR and JFK. Wait a >>minute, maybe you're right. > >Boy does everything fly over your head? > >He definitely was NO in charge. Cheney was the POTUS. Complete nonsense. By the middle of Bush's second term, Cheney was totally ignored by Bush. >I don't have any problem with moneyed people becoming president unless >they have nothing to offer. Bush fits that perfectly. He is, and >was, an empty suit. > >BK Obama doesn't even have the substance to be called an empty suit. |