health care
in [Golf]
|
From: Jack Hollis on 5 Mar 2010 20:41 On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:49:03 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: >Did you ever compare Gore's SAT scores to Bush? They were higher. Do >you think that he's of superior intelligence? Probably not, and that >would be a real sign of ideology with you. Al Gore got a 1355 on the SAT, which puts him around the genius level. I know Kerry didn't release his. Bush, Kerry and Gore had to take the SATs around the same time. >We all know that IQs and SAT scores don't relate to worldly >intelligence. Go to a Mensa meeting sometime and you'll see that in >an instance. The bottom line is that Bush is a dolt. I'm a Clinical Psychologist and spent years studying, administering and interpreting IQ tests. The concept of intelligence is quite complex and what is measured by traditional IQ tests is not the whole story. However, anyone who thinks that Bush is not a highly intelligent person is dead wrong. >Incidentally, Carter's IQ was 176 and he was the second worst >president in my lifetime. > > > >BK Exactly how was Carter's IQ determined?
From: Jack Hollis on 5 Mar 2010 20:43 On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:01:47 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> Incidentally, Carter's IQ was 176 and he was the second worst >> president in my lifetime. > >Carter is the worst US president ever. Obama's certainly has a good start in supplanting Carter for that honor.
From: Jack Hollis on 5 Mar 2010 20:50 On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:33:27 -0800 (PST), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Whatever there is. All Jack has to offer is a 1204 SAT score, which is >average, although Jack claims it proves beyond doubt that Bush is a >genius. Sorry John, but 1204 is well above average on the SAT. If it were an average score, then his IQ would have come out at around 100. >I score well on IQ tests, but I did poorly on the SATs. How does that >square with his premise? Please try to suppress your urge to respond >with malice. It is possible for people who have no formal education, or simply slept through their school years to do poorly on the SAT despite being smart. However, stupid people do not do well on the SAT. So Bush could be smarter than his scores show, but not dumber.
From: bknight on 5 Mar 2010 20:55 On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:41:20 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:49:03 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >>Did you ever compare Gore's SAT scores to Bush? They were higher. Do >>you think that he's of superior intelligence? Probably not, and that >>would be a real sign of ideology with you. > >Al Gore got a 1355 on the SAT, which puts him around the genius level. >I know Kerry didn't release his. Bush, Kerry and Gore had to take the >SATs around the same time. > >>We all know that IQs and SAT scores don't relate to worldly >>intelligence. Go to a Mensa meeting sometime and you'll see that in >>an instance. The bottom line is that Bush is a dolt. > >I'm a Clinical Psychologist and spent years studying, administering >and interpreting IQ tests. Highly unbelievable. Sorta like your doctorate from Columbia. The concept of intelligence is quite >complex and what is measured by traditional IQ tests is not the whole >story. However, anyone who thinks that Bush is not a highly >intelligent person is dead wrong. > > >>Incidentally, Carter's IQ was 176 and he was the second worst >>president in my lifetime. >> >>BK > >Exactly how was Carter's IQ determined? Ask someone who actually cares. At best they show the possibility of intelligence. BK
From: Jack Hollis on 5 Mar 2010 21:02
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:41:33 -0500, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >In the absence of you providing objective data we will have to rely upon >the objective data Jack provided. There's nothing wrong with that data at all. Is Bush's IQ 129 like the conversion chart shows? I don't know, but it's a good bet that it's somewhere between 126 and 132. Again, Bush's IQ is in the superior to very superior range. |