From: Howard Brazee on
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:22:52 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

>>Carter is the worst US president ever.
>>
>Nope....Bush has that honor.

Andy Jackson.

Professor Woodrow Wilson implemented Jim Crow into the Civil Service.
What could be worse than that?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:43:52 -0500, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>>> Incidentally, Carter's IQ was 176 and he was the second worst
>>> president in my lifetime.
>>
>>Carter is the worst US president ever.
>
>Obama's certainly has a good start in supplanting Carter for that
>honor.

He has a good chance of tying with his predecessor by keeping all of
Bush's policies.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:58:55 -0800 (PST), "John B."
<johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>I don't know where you got those numbers, but I doubt that more than
>10% of Americans even know what the bill's "current form" is. The fact
>is that Obama made very clear during his campaign that major,
>substantive health care reform was one of his top priorities. And he
>was elected. Congress has been working on this legislation for a year.
>It has been pased by both chambers. That is how democracy works.
>Nobody is ramming anything down anyone's throat.

But the new program isn't "major, substantive health care", but
instead, is a way to get more people to buy insurance, making more
money for the insurance companies.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Jack Hollis on
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:55:52 -0600, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

>>I'm a Clinical Psychologist and spent years studying, administering
>>and interpreting IQ tests.
>Highly unbelievable. Sorta like your doctorate from Columbia.

I couldn't be a Clinical Psychologist if I didn't get a doctorate from
somewhere. My PhD just happened to be from Columbia University. What
you believe, or don't believe, is irrelevant.
From: Jack Hollis on
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:26:22 -0800 (PST), "John B."
<johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 5, 9:02=A0pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:41:33 -0500, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
>> >In the absence of you providing objective data we will have to rely upon
>> >the objective data Jack provided.
>>
>> There's nothing wrong with that data at all. =A0Is Bush's IQ 129 like
>> the conversion chart shows? =A0I don't know, but it's a good bet that
>> it's somewhere between 126 and 132.
>>
>> Again, Bush's IQ is in the superior to very superior range. =A0
>
>Maybe there's nothing wrong with it, but it seems to be all you have.

It's all I need.