health care
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 12 Mar 2010 22:46 In article <d71048b3-3050-44a9-a6be- 67a7b6b501bf(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > On Mar 12, 4:07�pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > In article <clark-2953FD.09494312032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.26040e4b6362a0f0989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article <clark-01C165.08274512032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > In article <MPG.2603fe1645d1e633989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > In article <wclark2-4766D1.20413011032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > > state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > There we go - the plagiarized cut and paste we all expected. > > > > > > > > We learned it from you, the master of unattributed cut and pastes from > > > > > > Wikipedia. > > > > > > > Right. Keep it up, Bertie. Surely someone will side with you. > > > > > > Do you remember when you used Puerto Rico as an example of universal > > > > health care? You did a cut and paste from Wikipedia without attribution. > > > > > > Google is not your friend. > > > > > No, I don't :-) > > > > Your smiley can't assuage your disgusting, unethical and severely > > integrity lacking behavior. > > And your point is? You don't have an objective synapse in your brain, therefore, it would not do any good trying to explain it to you.
From: John B. on 13 Mar 2010 11:29 On Mar 12, 10:46 pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <d71048b3-3050-44a9-a6be- > 67a7b6b50...(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, johnb...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > On Mar 12, 4:07 pm, BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <clark-2953FD.09494312032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > In article <MPG.26040e4b6362a0f0989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > In article <clark-01C165.08274512032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > > In article <MPG.2603fe1645d1e633989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > In article <wclark2-4766D1.20413011032...(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > > > state.edu>, wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > There we go - the plagiarized cut and paste we all expected.. > > > > > > > > We learned it from you, the master of unattributed cut and pastes from > > > > > > > Wikipedia. > > > > > > > Right. Keep it up, Bertie. Surely someone will side with you. > > > > > > Do you remember when you used Puerto Rico as an example of universal > > > > > health care? You did a cut and paste from Wikipedia without attribution. > > > > > > Google is not your friend. > > > > > No, I don't :-) > > > > Your smiley can't assuage your disgusting, unethical and severely > > > integrity lacking behavior. > > > And your point is? > > You don't have an objective synapse in your brain, therefore, it would > not do any good trying to explain it to you. It was a joke, Bert. But what ever made me think you would get it?
From: Moderate on 15 Mar 2010 10:23 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:b11a0037-ed5f-46dc-bee6-2eb2977b5308(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... All these Dems made all these statements based on what the Bush admin. had told them. Removal of SH was not a "law." Congress can't pass a law requiring the removal of a foreign head of state. It was the policy of the Clinton administration that "regime change" was needed. Clinton never said anything about doing it by force. SH posed no existential threat to the U.S. or its allies. *************************************************** Really? Then why were they saying the same thing during the Clinton Administration? You Dems need to find a different strategy. Blaming Bush for everything is so played.
From: Howard Brazee on 15 Mar 2010 20:53 On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:13:30 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >All these Dems made all these statements based on what the Bush admin. >had told them. Removal of SH was not a "law." Congress can't pass a >law requiring the removal of a foreign head of state. It was the >policy of the Clinton administration that "regime change" was needed. >Clinton never said anything about doing it by force. SH posed no >existential threat to the U.S. or its allies. Sometimes we need to trust what our president tells us. Then verify later. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 15 Mar 2010 20:57
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:23:02 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote: >You Dems need to find a different strategy. Blaming Bush for everything is >so played. Sort of like when the Republicans used budget reconciliation to allow a simple majority to implement the tax cuts that were the centerpiece of its program. But accuse the president of being like Hugo Chavez for using the same tool. Back when it took a week to get to Washington, the filibuster was a useful delaying tactic to wait until everybody arrived for a vote. Not it is used to keep from voting when your party doesn't have enough votes to defeat a bill. When the other guy's party does that, it's a trick to get around majority rule. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |