From: MNMikeW on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that you
>>>>will know what is in it/"
>>>
>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
>>> --
>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
>>
>
> The exact quote:
>
> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> away from the fog of the controversy".
>
> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
> public.
>
> BK
>
It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what is
in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
it, you know, like Obama promised.



From: William Clark on
In article <vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
> >news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that you
> >>>will know what is in it/"
> >>
> >> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
> >> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
> >> --
> >http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find
> >-out-whats-in-it/
> >
>
> The exact quote:
>
> ´┐ŻBut we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> away from the fog of the controversy".
>
> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
> public.
>
> BK
>

Who, as we know, are a hell of a sight smarter than the wingnuts on this
ng.
From: bknight on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>
><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:

>>>
>>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that you
>>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
>>>>
>>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
>>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
>>>> --
>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
>>>
>>
>> The exact quote:
>>
>> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
>> away from the fog of the controversy".
>>
>> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
>> public.
>>
>> BK
>>
>It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what is
>in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
>wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
>it, you know, like Obama promised.
>
>
Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
it has been passed? No.

There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
the last minute.

BK
From: MNMikeW on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that
>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
>>>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
>>>>> --
>>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
>>>>
>>>
>>> The exact quote:
>>>
>>> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
>>> away from the fog of the controversy".
>>>
>>> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
>>> public.
>>>
>>> BK
>>>
>>It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what
>>is
>>in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
>>wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
>>it, you know, like Obama promised.
>>
>>
> Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
> changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
> brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
> it has been passed? No.
>
> There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
> the last minute.
>
> BK

Well at least you admit you have half a brain.


From: bknight on
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:47:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
wrote:

>
><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:ie25q55rsj82knqv74t3tnlutm51lvfb0k(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>>news:vd15q5dviutdv8rvnu53c356lli3fc9bi2(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:11:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Don Kirkman" <donsno2(a)charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:iql4q5140u2ug1fsma98n4ekc3bv4tdebh(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:49:02 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Didn't Pelosi recently state that "we need to pass the bill so that
>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>will know what is in it/"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know, did she? If so please show us where and when. Otherwise
>>>>>> you're just casting aspersions, not discussing.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/nancy-pelosi-we-need-to-pass-health-care-bill-to-find-out-whats-in-it/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The exact quote:
>>>>
>>>> "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
>>>> away from the fog of the controversy".
>>>>
>>>> Makes a little more sense, since she was obviously speaking to the
>>>> public.
>>>>
>>>> BK
>>>>
>>>It still makes NO sense. You do not have to pass a bill to find out what
>>>is
>>>in it. Unless of course, they are trying to hid something. If she truly
>>>wanted to clear the "fog of the controversy", post it so people can ready
>>>it, you know, like Obama promised.
>>>
>>>
>> Unfortunately its still in progress and who knows what last minute
>> changes will be made, so it makes perfect sense to anyone with half a
>> brain. Can you say that you've known every thing in any bill before
>> it has been passed? No.
>>
>> There are always riders and the ubiquitous pork in all of them....at
>> the last minute.
>>
>> BK
>
>Well at least you admit you have half a brain.

And that you have less.

BK