From: Kommienezuspadt on

"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4b76f76e$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:59:10 -0500, BAR wrote:
>> In article <4b76e228$0$4874$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:10:46 -0500, BAR wrote:
>>>> In article <4b76cfc3$0$4867$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>>>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:32:01 -0500, BAR wrote:
>>>>>> In article <4b75e854$0$21064$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>>>>>> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:27:03 -0500, BAR wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nobody is stopping you, now, from obtaining any type, kind or
>>>>>>>> amount of health care except yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great! I'd like healthcare that covers me for every possible
>>>>>>> illness with no upfront co-pays at less than 2/3 of what I'm
>>>>>>> paying now, with no exclusions for pre-existing conditions and
>>>>>>> where the insurance company can never drop coverage. In return I
>>>>>>> will agree to Tort reform, such that I will never expect an
>>>>>>> honest mistake to be equivalent to winning the lottery.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are confusing Health Care with Health Insurance. This is
>>>>>> common for people of your ilk, the take care of me type.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are again failing to realize that both health care and health
>>>>> insurance are components of big healthcare. This is commong for
>>>>> people of your ilk, the ideologue sucker type.
>>>>
>>>> I do not accept your premise that health care and health insurance
>>>> need to be addressed in the same breath.
>>>
>>> You are free to be wrong if you want.
>>
>> You really are an obnoxious prick.
>
> I'm really not. I only jump on you because you're so irrational.

BAR calling someone a prick -- priceless!


From: assimilate on

On 13-Feb-2010, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

> >Bobby, individual policies are a very small percentage of the market.
>
> So? These raises will certainly make some difference.

it affects 3% of Californians

--
bill-o
From: BAR on
In article <4b773369$0$22816$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net says...
> >
> > What's the average per physician cost of malpractice insurance at your
> > facility? What's the average per medical personnel cost of malpractice
> > insurance at your facility?
>
> I don't have those numbers in a form that is easy to gather -- but I can
> tell you this -- our total insurance costs --- including buildings,
> liability, malpractice -- you name it -- is under 1% of total Gross
> Revenues -- and -- taking the contractual deductions into the equation -- it
> is still 1.34% of Net Revenues.
>
> This includes family practice docs -- ortho surgeons - general surgeons --
> pediatricians --- cardio-pulmonary -- rehabs ---
>
> We don't do major heart surgery or other surgeries of that type -- we send
> them out to the specialists.

> But then -- you didn't address the Texas question -- instead -- you snipped
> it out --- why should anyone take you seriously?

I was not interested in what Texas has done.

I was interested in the cost of malpractice insurance for persons
employed by or working under contract at your facility. It is
interesting that your malpractice insurance costs is only 1% of gross
revenue. But, that doesn't give a picture of how many physicians are on
staff and what their average malpractice insurance costs. What is the
total number of staff physicians, total number of contract physicians
and total number of physicians who have admitting privileges at your
facility. What I would like to know is whether your contract physicians
and physicians with admitting privileges have to pay, out of their own
pocket, for malpractice insurance to cover your facility while
practicing in your facility.







From: Kommienezuspadt on

"BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25e1bb208fcb340d989bb8(a)news.giganews.com...
> In article <4b773369$0$22816$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
> NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net says...
>> >
>> > What's the average per physician cost of malpractice insurance at your
>> > facility? What's the average per medical personnel cost of malpractice
>> > insurance at your facility?
>>
>> I don't have those numbers in a form that is easy to gather -- but I can
>> tell you this -- our total insurance costs --- including buildings,
>> liability, malpractice -- you name it -- is under 1% of total Gross
>> Revenues -- and -- taking the contractual deductions into the equation --
>> it
>> is still 1.34% of Net Revenues.
>>
>> This includes family practice docs -- ortho surgeons - general
>> surgeons --
>> pediatricians --- cardio-pulmonary -- rehabs ---
>>
>> We don't do major heart surgery or other surgeries of that type -- we
>> send
>> them out to the specialists.
>
>> But then -- you didn't address the Texas question -- instead -- you
>> snipped
>> it out --- why should anyone take you seriously?
>
> I was not interested in what Texas has done.
>

I am interested in Texas & how well its tort reform has worked.


From: BAR on
In article <4b77fd60$0$20323$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net says...
>
> "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25e1bb208fcb340d989bb8(a)news.giganews.com...
> > In article <4b773369$0$22816$882e0bbb(a)news.ThunderNews.com>,
> > NoSpam(a)NoThanks.net says...
> >> >
> >> > What's the average per physician cost of malpractice insurance at your
> >> > facility? What's the average per medical personnel cost of malpractice
> >> > insurance at your facility?
> >>
> >> I don't have those numbers in a form that is easy to gather -- but I can
> >> tell you this -- our total insurance costs --- including buildings,
> >> liability, malpractice -- you name it -- is under 1% of total Gross
> >> Revenues -- and -- taking the contractual deductions into the equation --
> >> it
> >> is still 1.34% of Net Revenues.
> >>
> >> This includes family practice docs -- ortho surgeons - general
> >> surgeons --
> >> pediatricians --- cardio-pulmonary -- rehabs ---
> >>
> >> We don't do major heart surgery or other surgeries of that type -- we
> >> send
> >> them out to the specialists.
> >
> >> But then -- you didn't address the Texas question -- instead -- you
> >> snipped
> >> it out --- why should anyone take you seriously?
> >
> > I was not interested in what Texas has done.
> >
>
> I am interested in Texas & how well its tort reform has worked.

Has it worked?