From: Frank Ketchum on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-5D793B.11034623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <Q4oUn.111143$304.58900(a)newsfe12.iad>,
> "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:wclark2-807C35.09255623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > In article <4TnUn.19800$3y2.1471(a)newsfe11.iad>,
>> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:wclark2-D6A5B6.18110421062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> > In article <CRKTn.39459$TL5.3072(a)newsfe24.iad>,
>> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:wclark2-7CDCC7.09314321062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> >> > In article <wlJTn.30674$%u7.454(a)newsfe14.iad>,
>> >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:wclark2-B86C83.08301621062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> >> >> > In article <888j9hF65pU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> >> >> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Happy Father's Day to all of your sperm donors out there!
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> What a terrific day! My M's swept the Reds and Tiger lost!!
>> >> >> >> >> Today....life be good!!!
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -Greg
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > And a Brit won in the US for the third week in a row! Oh,
>> >> >> >> > dear.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Why is that so fascinating to you? You mentioned the
>> >> >> >> possibility
>> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> happening last week (although you certainly weren't talking
>> >> >> >> about
>> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> brit
>> >> >> >> now were you?). Am I missing something? Why is this a big
>> >> >> >> deal?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Oh, just because it irritates the hell out of wingnut fanboys
>> >> >> > like
>> >> >> > you,
>> >> >> > doesn't it ?-).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Umm, not particularly.
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, you bite. Every time :-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > As I said, I picked an Ulsterman to win - just not quite
>> >> >> > the right one :-).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I picked a golfer to win. I guess we were both right by those
>> >> >> standards.
>> >> >
>> >> > Except mine was a lot more particular than yours.
>> >>
>> >> You said HARRINGTON would win ANOTHER US Open.
>> >>
>> >> He didn't win this US Open
>> >> He has never won a US Open
>> >>
>> >> Now you are telling us how right you were.
>> >>
>> >> Please continue.
>> >
>> > You clearly need a lesson in Irish geography, as well as reading the
>> > right thread. Harrington is NOT an Ulsterman - I fancied McIlroy (who
>> > is) to win, but McDowell will do.
>> >
>> > Go to the back of the class.
>>
>> How did I know you would continue?
>> What you actually said was Rory was a "good long odds punt" in a thread
>> discussing the betting odds.
>> That is not picking him to win. That is saying he has a better chance
>> than
>> the odds the bookies are given him.
>> And he didn't win anyway.
>> Please continue telling us how you were right.
>
> You also clearly have no grasp of British understatement, either. No,
> Rory didn't win, but another Ulsterman did, and you are still ticked off
> at the "three in a row" poke. I would suggest you get over it, and find
> a sense of humour before your blood pressure goes off scale :-)

Lol, there isn't anything you could say that would tick me off! I do not
give you that capacity.

Three in a row poke? Hell, I was hoping you were right about him winning
because I like Paddy a lot. He is one of my favorites.







From: William Clark on
In article <BQqUn.108478$_84.25174(a)newsfe18.iad>,
"Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:wclark2-5D793B.11034623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <Q4oUn.111143$304.58900(a)newsfe12.iad>,
> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >
> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> news:wclark2-807C35.09255623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> > In article <4TnUn.19800$3y2.1471(a)newsfe11.iad>,
> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:wclark2-D6A5B6.18110421062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> >> > In article <CRKTn.39459$TL5.3072(a)newsfe24.iad>,
> >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:wclark2-7CDCC7.09314321062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> >> >> > In article <wlJTn.30674$%u7.454(a)newsfe14.iad>,
> >> >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> news:wclark2-B86C83.08301621062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >> > In article <888j9hF65pU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> >> >> >> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> Happy Father's Day to all of your sperm donors out there!
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> What a terrific day! My M's swept the Reds and Tiger lost!!
> >> >> >> >> >> Today....life be good!!!
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> -Greg
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > And a Brit won in the US for the third week in a row! Oh,
> >> >> >> >> > dear.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Why is that so fascinating to you? You mentioned the
> >> >> >> >> possibility
> >> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >> happening last week (although you certainly weren't talking
> >> >> >> >> about
> >> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> brit
> >> >> >> >> now were you?). Am I missing something? Why is this a big
> >> >> >> >> deal?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Oh, just because it irritates the hell out of wingnut fanboys
> >> >> >> > like
> >> >> >> > you,
> >> >> >> > doesn't it ?-).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Umm, not particularly.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Well, you bite. Every time :-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > As I said, I picked an Ulsterman to win - just not quite
> >> >> >> > the right one :-).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I picked a golfer to win. I guess we were both right by those
> >> >> >> standards.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Except mine was a lot more particular than yours.
> >> >>
> >> >> You said HARRINGTON would win ANOTHER US Open.
> >> >>
> >> >> He didn't win this US Open
> >> >> He has never won a US Open
> >> >>
> >> >> Now you are telling us how right you were.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please continue.
> >> >
> >> > You clearly need a lesson in Irish geography, as well as reading the
> >> > right thread. Harrington is NOT an Ulsterman - I fancied McIlroy (who
> >> > is) to win, but McDowell will do.
> >> >
> >> > Go to the back of the class.
> >>
> >> How did I know you would continue?
> >> What you actually said was Rory was a "good long odds punt" in a thread
> >> discussing the betting odds.
> >> That is not picking him to win. That is saying he has a better chance
> >> than
> >> the odds the bookies are given him.
> >> And he didn't win anyway.
> >> Please continue telling us how you were right.
> >
> > You also clearly have no grasp of British understatement, either. No,
> > Rory didn't win, but another Ulsterman did, and you are still ticked off
> > at the "three in a row" poke. I would suggest you get over it, and find
> > a sense of humour before your blood pressure goes off scale :-)
>
> Lol, there isn't anything you could say that would tick me off! I do not
> give you that capacity.

Doesn't look like that way from where i stand ;-)
>
> Three in a row poke? Hell, I was hoping you were right about him winning
> because I like Paddy a lot. He is one of my favorites.

Yes, he does seem a truly likable individual. But I think we will get
some fun from Mr McIlroy in the coming years, and I understand that
McDowell's post-tournament party on Sunday was quite a bash. Perhaps
they can bring a little more fun back into the professional game?
From: Frank Ketchum on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-136736.16384023062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <BQqUn.108478$_84.25174(a)newsfe18.iad>,
> "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:wclark2-5D793B.11034623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > In article <Q4oUn.111143$304.58900(a)newsfe12.iad>,
>> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:wclark2-807C35.09255623062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> > In article <4TnUn.19800$3y2.1471(a)newsfe11.iad>,
>> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:wclark2-D6A5B6.18110421062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> >> > In article <CRKTn.39459$TL5.3072(a)newsfe24.iad>,
>> >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:wclark2-7CDCC7.09314321062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> >> >> > In article <wlJTn.30674$%u7.454(a)newsfe14.iad>,
>> >> >> >> > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> message
>> >> >> >> >> news:wclark2-B86C83.08301621062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
>> >> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> >> > In article <888j9hF65pU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> >> >> >> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Happy Father's Day to all of your sperm donors out there!
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> What a terrific day! My M's swept the Reds and Tiger
>> >> >> >> >> >> lost!!
>> >> >> >> >> >> Today....life be good!!!
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> -Greg
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > And a Brit won in the US for the third week in a row! Oh,
>> >> >> >> >> > dear.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Why is that so fascinating to you? You mentioned the
>> >> >> >> >> possibility
>> >> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> happening last week (although you certainly weren't talking
>> >> >> >> >> about
>> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> brit
>> >> >> >> >> now were you?). Am I missing something? Why is this a big
>> >> >> >> >> deal?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Oh, just because it irritates the hell out of wingnut fanboys
>> >> >> >> > like
>> >> >> >> > you,
>> >> >> >> > doesn't it ?-).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Umm, not particularly.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Well, you bite. Every time :-)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > As I said, I picked an Ulsterman to win - just not quite
>> >> >> >> > the right one :-).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I picked a golfer to win. I guess we were both right by those
>> >> >> >> standards.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Except mine was a lot more particular than yours.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You said HARRINGTON would win ANOTHER US Open.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> He didn't win this US Open
>> >> >> He has never won a US Open
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Now you are telling us how right you were.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please continue.
>> >> >
>> >> > You clearly need a lesson in Irish geography, as well as reading the
>> >> > right thread. Harrington is NOT an Ulsterman - I fancied McIlroy
>> >> > (who
>> >> > is) to win, but McDowell will do.
>> >> >
>> >> > Go to the back of the class.
>> >>
>> >> How did I know you would continue?
>> >> What you actually said was Rory was a "good long odds punt" in a
>> >> thread
>> >> discussing the betting odds.
>> >> That is not picking him to win. That is saying he has a better chance
>> >> than
>> >> the odds the bookies are given him.
>> >> And he didn't win anyway.
>> >> Please continue telling us how you were right.
>> >
>> > You also clearly have no grasp of British understatement, either. No,
>> > Rory didn't win, but another Ulsterman did, and you are still ticked
>> > off
>> > at the "three in a row" poke. I would suggest you get over it, and find
>> > a sense of humour before your blood pressure goes off scale :-)
>>
>> Lol, there isn't anything you could say that would tick me off! I do not
>> give you that capacity.
>
> Doesn't look like that way from where i stand ;-)
>>
>> Three in a row poke? Hell, I was hoping you were right about him winning
>> because I like Paddy a lot. He is one of my favorites.
>
> Yes, he does seem a truly likable individual. But I think we will get
> some fun from Mr McIlroy in the coming years, and I understand that
> McDowell's post-tournament party on Sunday was quite a bash. Perhaps
> they can bring a little more fun back into the professional game?

Agreed. The tour would benefit from some colorful characters. FWIW, there
really aren't any brits currently that I don't like. Spaniards, now, that
is a different story.


From: Howard Brazee on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:54:44 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
<nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

>> Yes, he does seem a truly likable individual. But I think we will get
>> some fun from Mr McIlroy in the coming years, and I understand that
>> McDowell's post-tournament party on Sunday was quite a bash. Perhaps
>> they can bring a little more fun back into the professional game?
>
>Agreed. The tour would benefit from some colorful characters. FWIW, there
>really aren't any brits currently that I don't like. Spaniards, now, that
>is a different story.

So you prefer the definition of Britain that excludes Northern
Ireland.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison
From: Frank Ketchum on

"Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message
news:16f5261irnvrrnvvrjjr1vnd78dur3dikk(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:54:44 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
>
>>> Yes, he does seem a truly likable individual. But I think we will get
>>> some fun from Mr McIlroy in the coming years, and I understand that
>>> McDowell's post-tournament party on Sunday was quite a bash. Perhaps
>>> they can bring a little more fun back into the professional game?
>>
>>Agreed. The tour would benefit from some colorful characters. FWIW,
>>there
>>really aren't any brits currently that I don't like. Spaniards, now, that
>>is a different story.
>
> So you prefer the definition of Britain that excludes Northern
> Ireland.

Meaning what exactly?


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Worse than vuvuzelas...
Next: What has happened to......