From: dene on

"Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote in message
news:iboGm.5681$aD1.168(a)newsfe19.iad...
>
> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
> news:7ksj7jF3bcditU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >
> > Why not accept RSG for what it is?
> >
>
> I do. I am not the one complaining about it. I am just offering a
> suggestion knowing full well nobody who bitches about it will lift a
finger
> to do anything about it.

Glad to read this. I enjoy your posts.

-Greg


From: Carbon on
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:14:15 -0800, dene wrote:
> "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote in message
> news:iboGm.5681$aD1.168(a)newsfe19.iad...
>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message
>> news:7ksj7jF3bcditU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>
>>> Why not accept RSG for what it is?
>>
>> I do. I am not the one complaining about it. I am just offering a
>> suggestion knowing full well nobody who bitches about it will lift a
>> finger to do anything about it.
>
> Glad to read this. I enjoy your posts.

Me too. Though of course you're both completely wrong about everything
:-).