From: dene on 29 Oct 2009 21:14 "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote in message news:iboGm.5681$aD1.168(a)newsfe19.iad... > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message > news:7ksj7jF3bcditU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > Why not accept RSG for what it is? > > > > I do. I am not the one complaining about it. I am just offering a > suggestion knowing full well nobody who bitches about it will lift a finger > to do anything about it. Glad to read this. I enjoy your posts. -Greg
From: Carbon on 29 Oct 2009 20:58 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:14:15 -0800, dene wrote: > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote in message > news:iboGm.5681$aD1.168(a)newsfe19.iad... >> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message >> news:7ksj7jF3bcditU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >>> Why not accept RSG for what it is? >> >> I do. I am not the one complaining about it. I am just offering a >> suggestion knowing full well nobody who bitches about it will lift a >> finger to do anything about it. > > Glad to read this. I enjoy your posts. Me too. Though of course you're both completely wrong about everything :-).
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Insurance companies are there to help us. Yeah, right. Next: UIP STRONGLY URGED AGAINST TITPB |