Obama - what a putz
in [Golf]
|
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 12:08 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:50:19 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >news:wclark2-D306EF.21520116062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> In article <dcui16lnki9q3erta5215n5bajeu3claqa(a)4ax.com>, >> Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:01:23 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >>> >>> >If he were a republican, impeachment hearings would have already begun. >>> >>> For the war? For the corporate bailouts? For zealous prosecution of >>> leaks? >>> >>> Are those impeachable offenses? >> >> For being black? > >I suppose when the only card you have left in your deck is the race >card...... > Is your only card left to deny that there is some racism implicit? BK
From: MNMikeW on 17 Jun 2010 12:13 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:r0ik161g4qt520n3ej3k0k37o49ivg9cjq(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:45:49 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>BP had stated they were going to pay for all of it far before the meeting. >> > Empty rhetoric until they were pressed. > > BK BS.
From: MNMikeW on 17 Jun 2010 12:18 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:73ik16dd29e6vucd91q9hg803gl7226joh(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:50:19 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>news:wclark2-D306EF.21520116062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> In article <dcui16lnki9q3erta5215n5bajeu3claqa(a)4ax.com>, >>> Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:01:23 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>>> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >>>> >>>> >If he were a republican, impeachment hearings would have already >>>> >begun. >>>> >>>> For the war? For the corporate bailouts? For zealous prosecution of >>>> leaks? >>>> >>>> Are those impeachable offenses? >>> >>> For being black? >> >>I suppose when the only card you have left in your deck is the race >>card...... >> > Is your only card left to deny that there is some racism implicit? > > BK Only you would agree with Clark.
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 12:19 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:r0ik161g4qt520n3ej3k0k37o49ivg9cjq(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:45:49 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>BP had stated they were going to pay for all of it far before the meeting. >>> >> Empty rhetoric until they were pressed. >> >> BK > >BS. I get it. You think that BP is a fine, upstanding company that is well-intentioned. That's real BS. If they could've gotten away with paying a few thousand bucks, that's what they would do. BK >
From: bknight on 17 Jun 2010 12:24
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:18:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:73ik16dd29e6vucd91q9hg803gl7226joh(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:50:19 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>>news:wclark2-D306EF.21520116062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article <dcui16lnki9q3erta5215n5bajeu3claqa(a)4ax.com>, >>>> Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:01:23 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >>>>> <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >If he were a republican, impeachment hearings would have already >>>>> >begun. >>>>> >>>>> For the war? For the corporate bailouts? For zealous prosecution of >>>>> leaks? >>>>> >>>>> Are those impeachable offenses? >>>> >>>> For being black? >>> >>>I suppose when the only card you have left in your deck is the race >>>card...... >>> >> Is your only card left to deny that there is some racism implicit? >> >> BK > >Only you would agree with Clark. Clark only asked a question. So did I and you didn't answer either. For good reason. BK > |