A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: William Clark on 2 Aug 2010 20:28 In article <MPG.26c113b367f2394c98a1aa(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-745AEB.09212902082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > Indeed, "the people" pay to have roads built. A communal, socialistic, > > > > decision (developers don;t build interstates, must as you would wish > > > > it). Nice snip of the relevant accusation, though. Saves you another > > > > red > > > > face. > > > > > > It sucks when you can't say that the Government builds the roads. The > > > government is just the middle man handling the money. > > > > And the "money" is the sole reason roads get built. No tickee, no > > shirtee. > > > > Nice job racist Billy. Does OSU know of your racist views. Good - you have now deflected so far off topic that you clearly have surrendered. About time. OSU would laugh you out of court. It is, of course, run entirely by ultra-left communists and pinkos.
From: William Clark on 2 Aug 2010 20:30 In article <MPG.26c11ac9771de52598a1ab(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-0C276F.09250002082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > In article <MPG.26bff64e39b56e0198a19f(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <wclark2-585A0F.21243801082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.26bf877e7e67eee698a185(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In article <wclark2-B74F08.12584701082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Evolution is a theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Correct. I'd say at this point it is a theory that is a close > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > proven > > > > > > > > as any theory can ever be, but it is still a theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, it is neither atheistic nor theistic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to Science a theory cannot never become a certanty. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The F word always comes into play when it comes down to the nunts > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > bolts. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only one "F" word for nutters like you. Tell you what, why > > > > > > don't you let us all in on the evidence for the faith-based origins > > > > > > of > > > > > > human life? > > > > > > > > > > Where did the Big Bang originate? > > > > > > > > From a singularity in the general theory of relativity, which led to an > > > > infinitely dense and hot Universe that then expanded. > > > > > > > > Not with and old man with a long white beard. > > > > > > "Not with and old man?" It appears that you have pissed on yourself > > > again by throwing stones at glass houses. > > > > Not really, it's just that I am so bored with answering your dumbassed > > posts that lose concentration. > > > > After all, it is not as if they require any intellectual input to > > respond to. > > "that lose concentration?" great grammar. No, just a bored typo. After all, gentlemen try to avoid using "I" - it's really not polite. But you wouldn't understand that.
From: William Clark on 2 Aug 2010 20:31 In article <8bogjpF8v3U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-B8DAC2.21294701082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <MPG.26bfbd93c85a419c98a197(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <5kqb56diek5m92djb6v60r1ilcpl82im5u(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 > > > @charter.net says... > > > > > > > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:58:09 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:56:46 -0400, William Clark > > > > ><wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Oh, and it is not necessary to be an atheist to believe in > evolution. > > > > >>That's just another creationist crock. > > > > > > > > >The big objection isn't in evolution - some evolution was obvious > long > > > > >before Darwin. > > > > > > > > >The objection is in natural selection, as long as "natural" means > "not > > > > >done by God or by Man". And of course, the idea that humans evolved > > > > >from something else. > > > > > > > > It's easier to find physical evidence that mankind (and every other > > > > living thing) evolved from gobs of protoplasm than it is to find > > > > evidence that there is a creative mind behind it all. It's in the > > > > DNA. > > > > > > Where did the DNA come from? > > > > > > I am not a propoent of intelligent design, never have been and never > > > will be. But, someone is going to have to come up with an explanation of > > > what caused the Big Bang. Chaos theory can be used to describe DNA > > > oringination on Earth but, if we start finding DNA in other parts of he > > > Solar systme, Galaxy or Universe there will have to be some re-Sciencing > > > going on. > > > > The explanations are all out there for the big bang. Problem is, it is > > not simple enough for those of your ilk, and requires some stretching of > > the mind that is clearly out of your reach. You know, special > > relativity, and all that. > > That is a stupid answer, professor. Hopefully my 18 year old will not run > into your ilk on the university level. > > -Greg OK, then let us discuss the Penrose-Hawking singularity, and its implications for the origins of the universe. Go ahead, after you.
From: William Clark on 2 Aug 2010 20:32 In article <8boghaF8egU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.26bfbd93c85a419c98a197(a)news.giganews.com... > > In article <5kqb56diek5m92djb6v60r1ilcpl82im5u(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 > > @charter.net says... > > > > > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:58:09 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:56:46 -0400, William Clark > > > ><wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>Oh, and it is not necessary to be an atheist to believe in evolution. > > > >>That's just another creationist crock. > > > > > > >The big objection isn't in evolution - some evolution was obvious long > > > >before Darwin. > > > > > > >The objection is in natural selection, as long as "natural" means "not > > > >done by God or by Man". And of course, the idea that humans evolved > > > >from something else. > > > > > > It's easier to find physical evidence that mankind (and every other > > > living thing) evolved from gobs of protoplasm than it is to find > > > evidence that there is a creative mind behind it all. It's in the > > > DNA. > > > > Where did the DNA come from? > > > > I am not a propoent of intelligent design, never have been and never > > will be. But, someone is going to have to come up with an explanation of > > what caused the Big Bang. Chaos theory can be used to describe DNA > > oringination on Earth but, if we start finding DNA in other parts of he > > Solar systme, Galaxy or Universe there will have to be some re-Sciencing > > going on. > > I think there is a bigger question at hand. Matter, left on it's own, > decays from complex to simple. The big question is how matter was formed > out of nothing, collided, then sparked life, then became increasingly > organized and complex. From where I sit, intelligent design is the only > rational answer. > > -Greg See the Penrose-Hawking singularity, and the origin of the universe as infinitely dense and infinitely hot.
From: William Clark on 2 Aug 2010 20:33
In article <8borp0FdqnU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:127d62e7-bc2a-4755-9a0e-c5f89d6c9d72(a)o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 2, 2:23 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > news:MPG.26bfbd93c85a419c98a197(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <5kqb56diek5m92djb6v60r1ilcpl82i...(a)4ax.com>, donsno2 > > > @charter.net says... > > > > > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:58:09 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...(a)brazee.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:56:46 -0400, William Clark > > > > ><wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>Oh, and it is not necessary to be an atheist to believe in > evolution. > > > > >>That's just another creationist crock. > > > > > > >The big objection isn't in evolution - some evolution was obvious > long > > > > >before Darwin. > > > > > > >The objection is in natural selection, as long as "natural" means > "not > > > > >done by God or by Man". And of course, the idea that humans evolved > > > > >from something else. > > > > > > It's easier to find physical evidence that mankind (and every other > > > > living thing) evolved from gobs of protoplasm than it is to find > > > > evidence that there is a creative mind behind it all. It's in the > > > > DNA. > > > > > Where did the DNA come from? > > > > > I am not a propoent of intelligent design, never have been and never > > > will be. But, someone is going to have to come up with an explanation of > > > what caused the Big Bang. Chaos theory can be used to describe DNA > > > oringination on Earth but, if we start finding DNA in other parts of he > > > Solar systme, Galaxy or Universe there will have to be some re-Sciencing > > > going on. > > > > I think there is a bigger question at hand. Matter, left on it's own, > > decays from complex to simple. The big question is how matter was formed > > out of nothing, collided, then sparked life, then became increasingly > > organized and complex. From where I sit, intelligent design is the only > > rational answer. > > > > -Greg > > Intelligent design is nothing more than a ruse cooked up by the people > who had tried and failed get the courts to force the teaching of > creationism in public schools. It's a joke. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Your opinion. There are plenty of smart people, including scientists, who > believe otherwise. > > -Greg For example? Just the ones whose works you have read. (Pause as Greg scuttles off to Google and Wikepedia to try to find some) |