A speech without substance
in [Golf]
|
From: Howard Brazee on 4 Sep 2008 22:52 On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:42:27 -0700 (PDT), annika1980 <annika1980(a)aol.com> wrote: >Is there an echo in here? Both parties can't always be wrong. Maybe both sides had substance on that issue.
From: Bruce Harper on 4 Sep 2008 22:57 In article <ZKGdnXdUasTQrV3VnZ2dnUVZ_tfinZ2d(a)earthlink.com>, "Road Rage" <kaceyw(a)mindspring.com> wrote: > Pubs would actually do it. Dems would suddenly forget ever saying it. Oh, like the hydrogen power promised by Shrub in his State of the Union address a couple of years ago?
From: Howard Beale on 4 Sep 2008 23:02 On Sep 4, 2:42 pm, annika1980 <annika1...(a)aol.com> wrote: > Last night Sarah Palin made a speech which went 40 minutes but was > short on issues. > The one brief mention of policy was stolen straight from Barack > Obama's DNC speech. > > Here's what Obama siad in his speech: > "As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean > coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I'll > help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of > the future are built right here in America. I'll make it easier for > the American people to afford these new cars. And I'll invest 150 > billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources > of energy - wind power and solar power and the next generation of > biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five > million new jobs that pay well and can't ever be outsourced." > > Now here's what palin had to say: > "Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to > lay more pipelines ... build more new-clear plants ... create jobs > with clean coal ... and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and > other alternative sources." > > Is there an echo in here? This is not a psychotic breakdown; it's a cleansing moment of clarity.
From: annika1980 on 5 Sep 2008 00:12 On Sep 4, 11:59 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > Randy....when are you and the rest of the libs going to figure it out. > There is a great distinction between McCain and Bush. Yeah, McCain is 10 years older and in poorer health. And McCain never went AWOL.
From: dene on 5 Sep 2008 00:35
"annika1980" <annika1980(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:d5e4b1f9-db55-43dd-b3d4-072e878fcd4a(a)e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... On Sep 4, 11:59 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > Randy....when are you and the rest of the libs going to figure it out. > There is a great distinction between McCain and Bush. Yeah, McCain is 10 years older and in poorer health. And McCain never went AWOL. --------------------------------------------------- McCain is a better leader. -Greg |