From: William Clark on
In article <i445i0$s13$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
"Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> news:clark-9EED7D.14075813082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > In article <i43ffi$kr1$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:clark-0870F0.07511013082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> >> > In article
> >> > <490353776303355409.232298nospam-nomail.com(a)news.suddenlink.net>,
> >> > Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >> > In article <19t8661161ho41l0nb8l8re3nnt9rf620o(a)4ax.com>,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As I said, he was not convicted. All you can do is try to turn it
> >> >> > around
> >> >> > to weasel your way out, but it doesn't fly.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Sorry, you lose.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Again.
> >> >>
> >> >> Nixon wasn't convicted either.
> >> >
> >> > Nixon left town before the sheriff could get him. He clearly knew what
> >> > the end result would be. A very different case, especially as his
> >> > transgressions were criminal.
> >>
> >> I knew I could bait you into making the same accusations against Nixon
> >> that
> >> you chastise others for saying about Clinton. That is what we call a
> >> double
> >> standard. On with the apology tour.
> >>
> >> Like a marionette.
> >
> > How can you equate a sexual escapade with a consenting adult with trying
> > to subvert the course of democracy by rigging a Presidential election?
> > God, I knew you loons had few ethical principles, but this is too much
> > even for you.
>
> Dance puppet, dance.

As I thought - you have nothing, have you?

We win.
From: bknight on
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:14:11 -0500, "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com>
wrote:

>
>"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message

>> How can you equate a sexual escapade with a consenting adult with trying
>> to subvert the course of democracy by rigging a Presidential election?
>> God, I knew you loons had few ethical principles, but this is too much
>> even for you.
>
>Dance puppet, dance.
>
You really are myopic. Why not try to answer his question? Do you
really want to diminish Nixon's crimes?

BK
From: Moderate on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-1887E5.15222913082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <i445i0$s13$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>
>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
>> news:clark-9EED7D.14075813082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > In article <i43ffi$kr1$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
>> > "Moderate" <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I knew I could bait you into making the same accusations against Nixon
>> >> that
>> >> you chastise others for saying about Clinton. That is what we call a
>> >> double
>> >> standard. On with the apology tour.
>> >>
>> >> Like a marionette.
>> >
>> > How can you equate a sexual escapade with a consenting adult with
>> > trying
>> > to subvert the course of democracy by rigging a Presidential election?
>> > God, I knew you loons had few ethical principles, but this is too much
>> > even for you.
>>
>> Dance puppet, dance.
>
> As I thought - you have nothing, have you?
>
> We win.

I have you on the end of my string :-)


From: Carbon on
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:26:13 -0500, Moderate wrote:
> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
> message
> news:clark-1887E5.15222913082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> In article <i445i0$s13$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate"
>> <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
>>> message
>>> news:clark-9EED7D.14075813082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>>>> In article <i43ffi$kr1$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, "Moderate"
>>>> <no_spam_(a)no_mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I knew I could bait you into making the same accusations against
>>>>> Nixon that you chastise others for saying about Clinton. That is
>>>>> what we call a double standard. On with the apology tour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like a marionette.
>>>>
>>>> How can you equate a sexual escapade with a consenting adult with
>>>> trying to subvert the course of democracy by rigging a Presidential
>>>> election? God, I knew you loons had few ethical principles, but
>>>> this is too much even for you.
>>>
>>> Dance puppet, dance.
>>
>> As I thought - you have nothing, have you?
>>
>> We win.
>
> I have you on the end of my string :-)

You describe yourself.
From: BAR on
In article <i43cmq$cip$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com
says...
>
> "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.26cefd4cd2561d6498a1f5(a)news.giganews.com...
> >
> > When are the Dems going to throw Rangel and Waters under the bus. Doing
> > so would save them a couple of seats in November.
>
> They don't have to throw them under the bus, but it would be nice if they
> stopped having rallies for them.

How much campaign booty did Rangel raise at his belated birthday party?
Do you believe we will ever know or will it end up in mattresses?